Literature DB >> 28986931

Can point-of-care ultrasound predict spinal hypotension during caesarean section? A prospective observational study.

L Zieleskiewicz1, A Noel1, G Duclos1, M Haddam1, A Delmas1, C Bechis1, A Loundou2, J Blanc3, A Mignon1, L Bouvet4, S Einav5, A Bourgoin1, M Leone1,6.   

Abstract

Spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section is associated with maternal hypotension, secondary to alteration of sympathetic tone and hypovolemia, in up to 70% of cases. Measurement of the subaortic variation in the velocity time integral (VTI) after passive leg raising allows prediction of fluid responsiveness. Our objective, in this prospective single-centre observational study, was to assess the ability of change in VTI after 45° passive leg raising to predict hypotension after spinal anaesthesia. Ultrasound measurements were performed just before elective caesarean section. Anaesthesia, intravenous coloading and prophylactic vasopressor treatment were standardised according to current guidelines. We studied 40 women. Hypotension occurred in 17 (45%) women. The area (95%CI) under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for the prediction of spinal hypotension was 0.8 (0.6-0.9; p = 0.0001). Seventeen women had a change in VTI with leg elevation ≤ 8%, which was predictive for not developing hypotension, and 11 had a change ≥ 21%, predictive for hypotension. The grey zone between 8% and 21%, with inconclusive values, included 12 women. We suggest that cardiac ultrasound provides characterisation of the risk of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia at elective caesarean section, and therefore may allow individualised strategies for prevention and management.
© 2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caesarean section; maternal hypotension; passive leg raising; point-of-care ultrasound; spinal anaesthesia: complications; transthoracic echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28986931     DOI: 10.1111/anae.14063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia during cesarean section : Current treatment concepts].

Authors:  R Fantin; C M Ortner; K U Klein; G Putz; D Marhofer; S Jochberger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Effect of Glucose Containing Crystalloid Infusion on Maternal Hemodynamic Status After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Simin Atashkhoei; Reyhaneh Abri; Bahman Naghipour; Pouya Hatami Marandi; Mohammad Taher Fazeli Danesh
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-08-25

3.  The utility of limited trans-thoracic echocardiography in the stratification of pulse pressure variation: A feasibility study in major open abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Tanvir Samra; R Deepak; Aveek Jayant; Vikas Saini
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

4.  The application of a neural network to predict hypotension and vasopressor requirements non-invasively in obstetric patients having spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section (C/S).

Authors:  Irwin Gratz; Martin Baruch; Magdy Takla; Julia Seaman; Isabel Allen; Brian McEniry; Edward Deal
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Optimum dose of spinal ropivacaine with or without single intravenous bolus of S-ketamine during elective cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind, sequential dose-finding study.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Jianwei Wang; Xiao-Hu An; Yu-Chieh Chao; Yong Bian; Zifeng Xu; Tao Xu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The transverse diameter of right common femoral vein by ultrasound in the supine position for predicting post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Shi-Fa Yao; Yan-Hong Zhao; Jing Zheng; Jie-Yan Qian; Chen Zhang; Zifeng Xu; Tao Xu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.