Literature DB >> 28986669

HIV Risk Behaviors and Utilization of Prevention Services, Urban and Rural Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States: Results from a National Online Survey.

Jennie McKenney1, Patrick S Sullivan2, Kristina E Bowles3, Emeka Oraka4, Travis H Sanchez2, Elizabeth DiNenno3.   

Abstract

Rural men who have sex with men (MSM) are heavily affected by HIV, and many lack culturally competent HIV prevention resources. Rural MSM may find sexual partners on the internet, which may also be a way to deliver prevention services to them. To understand the differences between rural and urban MSM with respect to HIV risk factors and behaviors and the utilization of online HIV prevention services, we used data from the 2012 Web-Based HIV Behavioral Survey (WHBS). Using WHBS data collected between June and August 2012, we compared the characteristics of MSM with positive or unknown HIV infection status who had sex with a male in the past 12 months, from rural vs urban areas using Chi square tests and median tests. We used logistic regression and calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare self-reported HIV risk behaviors, HIV/STI testing behaviors, use of prevention services, and perceived discrimination. Of the 8166 MSM included in our analysis, 3583 (44%) were from rural areas, and 4583 (56%) were from urban areas. Compared to urban MSM, rural MSM were less likely to ever test for HIV (aPR = 0.94, CI 0.92-0.95), to be tested for HIV in the last year (aPR = 0.83, CI 0.79-0.87), or to receive free condoms (aPR = 0.83, CI 0.79-0.86) or individual prevention counseling in the past year (aPR = 0.86, CI 0.78-0.95). Rural MSM were less likely to have been tested in the last year for syphilis, gonorrhea, or chlamydia (aPR = 0.70, CI 0.62-0.78; aPR = 0.72, CI 0.64-0.81; aPR = 0.75, CI 0.67-0.85, respectively). Rural MSM also reported perceiving less tolerance of gays and bisexuals within their community (aPR = 0.80, CI 0.77-0.84). HIV prevalence is lower among MSM in rural areas compared to MSM in urban areas, but rural MSM report that they are more likely to face intolerance and are less likely to use basic HIV prevention services compared to urban MSM. Therefore, this hard-to-reach population could benefit from prevention services offered through the internet.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; MSM; Rural; Urban

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28986669     DOI: 10.1007/s10461-017-1912-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  22 in total

1.  Association between the geographic accessibility of PrEP and PrEP use among MSM in nonurban areas.

Authors:  J Danielle Sharpe; Travis H Sanchez; Aaron J Siegler; Jodie L Guest; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.667

2.  Sexual Health of Rural and Urban Young Male Couples in the United States: Differences in HIV Testing, Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use, and Condom Use.

Authors:  Elissa L Sarno; Emily Bettin; Kyle Jozsa; Michael E Newcomb
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2021-01

Review 3.  Sexually Transmitted Infection Epidemiology and Care in Rural Areas: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Wiley D Jenkins; Leslie D Williams; William S Pearson
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Sociodemographic Characteristics of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Use and Reasons for Nonuse Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men from Three US Cities.

Authors:  Krishna Kiran Kota; Gordon Mansergh; Rob Stephenson; Sabina Hirshfield; Patrick Sullivan
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.078

5.  Factors associated with barriers to engagement in HIV-prevention care among sexual minority men.

Authors:  Audrey Harkness; Sierra A Bainter; Noelle A Mendez; Daniel Hernandez Altamirano; Conall O'Cleirigh; Matthew J Mimiaga; Kenneth H Mayer; Steven A Safren
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-05-16

6.  Scaling Up CareKit: Lessons Learned from Expansion of a Centralized Home HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Program.

Authors:  Jenna Norelli; Maria Zlotorzynska; Travis Sanchez; Patrick S Sullivan
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Patterns of Online and Offline Partnering, Partnership Characteristics, and Condomless Sex Among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males in the USA.

Authors:  Kathryn Macapagal; Kevin Moran; Michael E Newcomb; David A Moskowitz; Christopher Owens; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2021-01-01

8.  Prevalence and correlates of lifetime and recent HIV testing among men who have sex with men (MSM) who use mobile geo-social networking applications in Greater Tokyo.

Authors:  Adam O Hill; Benjamin R Bavinton; Gregory Armstrong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  HIV Prevention Via Mobile Messaging for Men Who Have Sex With Men (M-Cubed): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Patrick Sean Sullivan; Ryan J Zahn; Sarah Wiatrek; Cristian J Chandler; Sabina Hirshfield; Rob Stephenson; Jose A Bauermeister; Mary Ann Chiasson; Martin J Downing; Deborah J Gelaude; Aaron J Siegler; Keith Horvath; Erin Rogers; Ana Alas; Evelyn J Olansky; Heather Saul; Eli S Rosenberg; Gordon Mansergh
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-11-15

10.  Racial Disparities and the Effect of County Level Income on the Incidence and Survival of Young Men with Anal Cancer.

Authors:  Markian M Bojko; Robert J Kucejko; Juan L Poggio
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2018-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.