Lauren M Walker1,2, Majken P Villiger3, John W Robinson4,5. 1. Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. Lauren.walker@ahs.ca. 2. Psychosocial and Rehabilitation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada. Lauren.walker@ahs.ca. 3. Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 4. Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 5. Psychosocial and Rehabilitation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Communication and assessment of sexual health within cancer care is poor despite high rates of sexual dysfunction in cancer survivors. Screening for distress programs have been implemented, as a standardized part of cancer care across Canada, with the aim of increasing identification and improving access to support. Alberta Health Services uses a general distress screening form, containing the Canadian Problem Checklist, which includes a list of possible problems, one of which is "intimacy/sexuality." Theoretically, the discreet nature of the screening for distress form may reduce patient discomfort in disclosing sexual concerns verbally, and therefore help health care providers identify patients requiring intervention. This study aims to determine the adequacy of this distress screening tool in identifying gynecological cancer patients who have an intimacy/sexuality concern. METHODS: A chart review was conducted on all follow-up visits in a gyne-oncology clinic over 1 year. Each patient's chart was reviewed to determine the prevalence of the distress screening form completion, prevalence of the "intimacy/sexuality" item being checked, and documentation of actions taken to address any reported intimacy/sexuality problems. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty patient visits were recorded during this period with completed distress screening forms found on 79.0% (n = 577) of charts. Only 6% of the patients indicated an intimacy/sexuality concern on this form. Of those, only one third had documentation that their problem was addressed. CONCLUSIONS: These results call into question the utility of the intimacy/sexuality item on the Canadian Problem Checklist to identify gynecological cancer patients who have sexual concerns. Furthermore, even among those patients who indicated concerns, there is evidence that their problems are rarely addressed. Providers need to directly inquire with patients about their sexual health.
PURPOSE: Communication and assessment of sexual health within cancer care is poor despite high rates of sexual dysfunction in cancer survivors. Screening for distress programs have been implemented, as a standardized part of cancer care across Canada, with the aim of increasing identification and improving access to support. Alberta Health Services uses a general distress screening form, containing the Canadian Problem Checklist, which includes a list of possible problems, one of which is "intimacy/sexuality." Theoretically, the discreet nature of the screening for distress form may reduce patient discomfort in disclosing sexual concerns verbally, and therefore help health care providers identify patients requiring intervention. This study aims to determine the adequacy of this distress screening tool in identifying gynecological cancerpatients who have an intimacy/sexuality concern. METHODS: A chart review was conducted on all follow-up visits in a gyne-oncology clinic over 1 year. Each patient's chart was reviewed to determine the prevalence of the distress screening form completion, prevalence of the "intimacy/sexuality" item being checked, and documentation of actions taken to address any reported intimacy/sexuality problems. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty patient visits were recorded during this period with completed distress screening forms found on 79.0% (n = 577) of charts. Only 6% of the patients indicated an intimacy/sexuality concern on this form. Of those, only one third had documentation that their problem was addressed. CONCLUSIONS: These results call into question the utility of the intimacy/sexuality item on the Canadian Problem Checklist to identify gynecological cancerpatients who have sexual concerns. Furthermore, even among those patients who indicated concerns, there is evidence that their problems are rarely addressed. Providers need to directly inquire with patients about their sexual health.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer; Distress screening; Gynecologic oncology; Oncology; Sexual distress; Sexuality
Authors: Michael DeSimone; Elizabeth Spriggs; Jennifer S Gass; Sandra A Carson; Michael L Krychman; Don S Dizon Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Stacy Tessler Lindau; L Philip Schumm; Edward O Laumann; Wendy Levinson; Colm A O'Muircheartaigh; Linda J Waite Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adele Duimering; Lauren M Walker; Jill Turner; Elisha Andrews-Lepine; Amy Driga; Ashley Ayume; John W Robinson; Ericka Wiebe Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 3.603