Lorenzo Del Sorbo1, Ewan C Goligher1, Daniel F McAuley2, Gordon D Rubenfeld1,3, Laurent J Brochard1,4, Luciano Gattinoni5, Arthur S Slutsky1,4, Eddy Fan1. 1. 1 Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. 2 Regional Intensive Care Unit Royal Victoria Hospital and Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom. 3. 3 Program in Trauma, Emergency, and Critical Care, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. 4 Keenan Research Center, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and. 5. 5 Department of Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Abstract
RATIONALE: The American Thoracic Society/European Society for Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines on mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) provide treatment recommendations derived from a thorough analysis of the clinical evidence on six clinical interventions. However, each of the recommendations contains areas of uncertainty and controversy, which may affect their appropriate clinical application. OBJECTIVES: To provide a critical review of the experimental evidence surrounding the pathophysiology of ventilator-induced lung injury and to help clinicians apply the clinical recommendations to individual patients. METHODS: We conducted a literature search and narrative review. RESULTS: A large number of experimental studies have been performed with the aim of improving understanding of the pathophysiological effects of mechanical ventilation. These studies have formed the basis for the design of many clinical trials. Translational research has fundamentally advanced understanding of the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury, thus informing the design of interventions that improve survival in patients with ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: Because daily management of patients with ARDS presents the challenge of competing considerations, clinicians should consider the mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury, as well as the rationale for interventions designed to mitigate it, when applying evidence-based recommendations at the bedside.
RATIONALE: The American Thoracic Society/European Society for Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines on mechanical ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) provide treatment recommendations derived from a thorough analysis of the clinical evidence on six clinical interventions. However, each of the recommendations contains areas of uncertainty and controversy, which may affect their appropriate clinical application. OBJECTIVES: To provide a critical review of the experimental evidence surrounding the pathophysiology of ventilator-induced lung injury and to help clinicians apply the clinical recommendations to individual patients. METHODS: We conducted a literature search and narrative review. RESULTS: A large number of experimental studies have been performed with the aim of improving understanding of the pathophysiological effects of mechanical ventilation. These studies have formed the basis for the design of many clinical trials. Translational research has fundamentally advanced understanding of the mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury, thus informing the design of interventions that improve survival in patients with ARDS. CONCLUSIONS: Because daily management of patients with ARDS presents the challenge of competing considerations, clinicians should consider the mechanism of ventilator-induced lung injury, as well as the rationale for interventions designed to mitigate it, when applying evidence-based recommendations at the bedside.
Authors: Ken Kuljit S Parhar; Karolina Zjadewicz; Gwen E Knight; Andrea Soo; Jamie M Boyd; Danny J Zuege; Daniel J Niven; Christopher J Doig; Henry T Stelfox Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2021-05-17
Authors: Gary F Nieman; Hassan Al-Khalisy; Michaela Kollisch-Singule; Joshua Satalin; Sarah Blair; Girish Trikha; Penny Andrews; Maria Madden; Louis A Gatto; Nader M Habashi Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2020-03-19 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Chiara Robba; Sabrine N T Hemmes; Ary Serpa Neto; Thomas Bluth; Jaume Canet; Michael Hiesmayr; M Wiersma Hollmann; Gary H Mills; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Christian Putensen; Samir Jaber; Werner Schmid; Paolo Severgnini; Hermann Wrigge; Denise Battaglini; Lorenzo Ball; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Marcus J Schultz; Paolo Pelosi Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 2.217