Literature DB >> 28985322

Chemical Evaluation of Electronic Cigarettes: Multicomponent Analysis of Liquid Refills and their Corresponding Aerosols.

Nicolas Beauval1,2, Sébastien Antherieu1, Mélissa Soyez1, Nicolas Gengler3, Nathalie Grova4, Michael Howsam5, Emilie M Hardy4, Marc Fischer3, Brice M R Appenzeller4, Jean-François Goossens5, Delphine Allorge1, Guillaume Garçon1, Jean-Marc Lo-Guidice1, Anne Garat1.   

Abstract

Electronic cigarette use has raised concern worldwide regarding potential health risks and its position in tobacco cessation strategies. As part of any toxicity assessment, the chemical characterization of e-liquids and their related vapors are among fundamental data to be determined. Considering the lack of available reference methods, we developed and validated several analytical procedures in order to conduct a multicomponent analysis of six e-liquid refills and their resultant vapor emissions (generated by a smoking machine), and compared them with tobacco smoke. We combined several techniques including gas-chromatography, high and ultra-performance liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma with mass spectrometry or ultraviolet and flame ionization detection in order to identify the main e-liquid constituents (propylene glycol, glycerol and nicotine), as well as multiple potentially harmful components (trace elements, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides and carbonyl compounds). Regarding propylene glycol, glycerol and nicotine concentrations, the six tested e-liquids comply with the advertised composition and contain only traces of pollutants. Noticeable lower concentrations of trace elements (≤3.4 pg/mL puff), pesticides (<LOQ), PAHs (≤4.1 pg/mL puff) and carbonyls (≤2.11 ng/mL puff) were measured in e-vapors compared to those in cigarette smoke (up to 45.0 pg/mL puff, 8.7 pg/mL puff, 560.8 pg/mL puff and 1540 ng/mL puff, respectively). Although an accurate characterization of electronic cigarette emissions requires further analytical optimizations, our results have shown that vaping exposes the user to lesser amounts of selected toxic components of concern found in some representative French e-cigarette products than does smoking typical conventional cigarettes.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28985322     DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkx054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  18 in total

1.  Flavor-specific enhancement of electronic cigarette liquid consumption and preference in mice.

Authors:  A L Wong; S M McElroy; J M Robinson; S M Mulloy; F K El Banna; A C Harris; M G LeSage; A M Lee
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  The Impact of E-liquid Propylene Glycol and Vegetable Glycerin Ratio on Ratings of Subjective Effects, Reinforcement Value, and Use in Current Smokers.

Authors:  Tracy T Smith; Bryan W Heckman; Amy E Wahlquist; K Michael Cummings; Matthew J Carpenter
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Initial ratings of different types of e-cigarettes and relationships between product appeal and nicotine delivery.

Authors:  Peter Hajek; Dunja Przulj; Anna Phillips-Waller; Rebecca Anderson; Hayden McRobbie
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Review of Cases of E-Cigarette or Vaping Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) and Brief Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Amr Essa; Jeffrey Macaraeg; Nikhil Jagan; Daniel Kwon; Saboor Randhawa; Matthew Kruse; Stanley Thomas; Manasa Velagapudi; John Horne; Shraddha Narechania; Michael Kaster; Carrie Valenta; Venketraman Sahasranaman; Douglas Moore
Journal:  Case Rep Pulmonol       Date:  2020-06-14

5.  Method Validation Approaches for Analysis of Constituents in ENDS.

Authors:  Samantha M Reilly; Tianrong Cheng; Jenna DuMond
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2020-07

Review 6.  Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Gene Gillman
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Environmental Electronic Vape Exposure from Four Different Generations of Electronic Cigarettes: Airborne Particulate Matter Levels.

Authors:  Carmela Protano; Pasquale Avino; Maurizio Manigrasso; Valerio Vivaldi; Franco Perna; Federica Valeriani; Matteo Vitali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Metal/Metalloid Levels in Electronic Cigarette Liquids, Aerosols, and Human Biosamples: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Di Zhao; Atul Aravindakshan; Markus Hilpert; Pablo Olmedo; Ana M Rule; Ana Navas-Acien; Angela Aherrera
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  The Impact of Device Settings, Use Patterns, and Flavorings on Carbonyl Emissions from Electronic Cigarettes.

Authors:  Yeongkwon Son; Clifford Weisel; Olivia Wackowski; Stephan Schwander; Cristine Delnevo; Qingyu Meng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Effects of E-Cigarette Vapor Components on the Morphology and Function of the Male and Female Reproductive Systems: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kamila Szumilas; Paweł Szumilas; Anna Grzywacz; Aleksandra Wilk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.