Ana-Carolina Gonçalves1,2, Joana Cruz3,4,5, Alda Marques3,4, Sara Demain1, Dinesh Samuel1. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. 2. Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. 3. Lab three R-Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. 4. Institute for Research in Biomedicine (iBiMED), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. 5. School of Health Sciences, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Leiria, Portugal.
Abstract
Background: physical activity is recommended for people living with dementia, but evidence for the positive effects of physical activity is limited by the use of heterogeneous outcomes and measurement tools. This systematic literature review aimed to summarise previously reported outcomes and identify the measurement tools used most frequently in physical activity interventions for people with dementia. Methods: literature searches were conducted in April 2015, on Delphis and Medline. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies reporting on any type of physical activity, in any setting, across types of dementia, stages of disease progression and published from 2005 onwards were included. A content analysis approach was used to report on the frequency of reported outcomes and measurement tools. Results: the 130 included studies reported on 133 different outcome domains and 267 different measurement tools. 'Functional abilities and independence' (n = 69), 'Global cognitive function' (n = 65), 'Balance' (n = 43), 'Global behavioural symptoms of dementia' (n = 42) and 'Health-related quality of life' (n = 40) were the most frequently reported outcome domains. 'Enjoyment' was the outcome most frequently sought by patients and carers. Conclusion: the need for the development and implementation of a Core Outcome Set has been reinforced. Ahead of the completion of the Core Outcome Set, researchers and clinicians are advised to measure the impact of physical activity interventions on these frequently reported outcome domains.
Background: physical activity is recommended for people living with dementia, but evidence for the positive effects of physical activity is limited by the use of heterogeneous outcomes and measurement tools. This systematic literature review aimed to summarise previously reported outcomes and identify the measurement tools used most frequently in physical activity interventions for people with dementia. Methods: literature searches were conducted in April 2015, on Delphis and Medline. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies reporting on any type of physical activity, in any setting, across types of dementia, stages of disease progression and published from 2005 onwards were included. A content analysis approach was used to report on the frequency of reported outcomes and measurement tools. Results: the 130 included studies reported on 133 different outcome domains and 267 different measurement tools. 'Functional abilities and independence' (n = 69), 'Global cognitive function' (n = 65), 'Balance' (n = 43), 'Global behavioural symptoms of dementia' (n = 42) and 'Health-related quality of life' (n = 40) were the most frequently reported outcome domains. 'Enjoyment' was the outcome most frequently sought by patients and carers. Conclusion: the need for the development and implementation of a Core Outcome Set has been reinforced. Ahead of the completion of the Core Outcome Set, researchers and clinicians are advised to measure the impact of physical activity interventions on these frequently reported outcome domains.
Authors: Kirk I Erickson; Charles Hillman; Chelsea M Stillman; Rachel M Ballard; Bonny Bloodgood; David E Conroy; Richard Macko; David X Marquez; Steven J Petruzzello; Kenneth E Powell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Loretta Dipietro; Wayne W Campbell; David M Buchner; Kirk I Erickson; Kenneth E Powell; Bonny Bloodgood; Timothy Hughes; Kelsey R Day; Katrina L Piercy; Alison Vaux-Bjerke; Richard D Olson Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Petra Scheerbaum; Stephanie Book; Michael Jank; Etienne Hanslian; Melanie DellO'ro; Julia Schneider; Julia-Sophia Scheuermann; Sophia Bösl; Michael Jeitler; Christian Kessler; Elmar Graessel Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: David X Marquez; Susan Aguiñaga; Priscilla M Vásquez; David E Conroy; Kirk I Erickson; Charles Hillman; Chelsea M Stillman; Rachel M Ballard; Bonny Bloodgood Sheppard; Steven J Petruzzello; Abby C King; Kenneth E Powell Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Jason K Longhurst; Morgan A Wise; Daniel J Krist; Caitlin A Moreland; Jon A Basterrechea; Merrill R Landers Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Sandra Trautwein; Bettina Barisch-Fritz; Andrea Scharpf; Willem Bossers; Marcus Meinzer; Simon Steib; Thorsten Stein; Klaus Bös; Alexander Stahn; Claudia Niessner; Stefan Altmann; Rita Wittelsberger; Alexander Woll Journal: Eur Rev Aging Phys Act Date: 2019-04-13 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Louise O'Connor; Emily Smyth; Annemarie E Bennett; Valerie Smith; Linda O'Neill; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey; Emer Guinan Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 4.430