Literature DB >> 28984675

Feasibility of Prostate PAXgene Fixation for Molecular Research and Diagnostic Surgical Pathology: Comparison of Matched Fresh Frozen, FFPE, and PFPE Tissues.

Gunilla Högnäs1, Kati Kivinummi1, Heini M L Kallio1, Reija Hieta1, Pekka Ruusuvuori1,2, Antti Koskenalho1, Juha Kesseli1, Teuvo L J Tammela1,3, Jarno Riikonen3, Joanna Ilvesaro4, Saara Kares4, Pasi P Hirvikoski5, Marita Laurila4, Tuomas Mirtti6,7, Matti Nykter1, Paula M Kujala4, Tapio Visakorpi1,4, Teemu Tolonen4, G Steven Bova1.   

Abstract

Advances in prostate cancer biology and diagnostics are dependent upon high-fidelity integration of clinical, histomorphologic, and molecular phenotypic findings. In this study, we compared fresh frozen, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), and PAXgene-fixed paraffin-embedded (PFPE) tissue preparation methods in radical prostatectomy prostate tissue from 36 patients and performed a preliminary test of feasibility of using PFPE tissue in routine prostate surgical pathology diagnostic assessment. In addition to comparing histology, immunohistochemistry, and general measures of DNA and RNA integrity in each fixation method, we performed functional tests of DNA and RNA quality, including targeted Miseq RNA and DNA sequencing, and implemented methods to relate DNA and RNA yield and quality to quantified DNA and RNA picogram nuclear content in each tissue volume studied. Our results suggest that it is feasible to use PFPE tissue for routine robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgical pathology diagnostics and immunohistochemistry, with the benefit of significantly improvedDNA and RNA quality and RNA picogram yield per nucleus as compared with FFPE tissue. For fresh frozen, FFPE, and PFPE tissues, respectively, the average Genomic Quality Numbers were 7.9, 3.2, and 6.2, average RNA Quality Numbers were 8.7, 2.6, and 6.3, average DNA picogram yields per nucleus were 0.41, 0.69, and 0.78, and average RNA picogram yields per nucleus were 1.40, 0.94, and 2.24. These findings suggest that where DNA and/or RNA analysis of tissue is required, and when tissue size is small, PFPE may provide important advantages over FFPE. The results also suggest several interesting nuances including potential avenues to improve RNA quality in FFPE tissues and confirm recent suggestions that some DNA sequence artifacts associated with FFPE can be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28984675     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  6 in total

1.  Transperineal Parallel Biopsy of the Prostate: A New Approach of Tissue Sampling for Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Min Qu; Bijun Lian; Yan Wang; Wenhui Zhang; Feng Zhu; Tao Wang; Xiaodong Yue; Zepeng Jia; Huan Chen; Husheng Li; Jing Li; Xu Gao
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-05-03

2.  Do Tissues Fixed in a Non-crosslinking Fixative Require a Dedicated Formalin-free Processor?

Authors:  Sonia G Frasquilho; Ignacio Sanchez; Changyoung Yoo; Laurent Antunes; Camille Bellora; William Mathieson
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Impact of storage conditions on the quality of nucleic acids in paraffin embedded tissues.

Authors:  Daniel Groelz; Christian Viertler; Daniela Pabst; Nadine Dettmann; Kurt Zatloukal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Samples for Next Generation Sequencing: Problems and Solutions.

Authors:  Gerardo Cazzato; Concetta Caporusso; Francesca Arezzo; Antonietta Cimmino; Anna Colagrande; Vera Loizzi; Gennaro Cormio; Teresa Lettini; Eugenio Maiorano; Vincenza Sara Scarcella; Paola Tarantino; Maricla Marrone; Alessandra Stellacci; Paola Parente; Paolo Romita; Aurora De Marco; Vincenzo Venerito; Caterina Foti; Giuseppe Ingravallo; Roberta Rossi; Leonardo Resta
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  PAXgene Fixation for Pancreatic Cancer: Implications for Molecular and Surgical Pathology.

Authors:  Ryan DeCoste; Yutaka Amemiya; Sarah Nersesian; Lauren Westhaver; Stacey N Lee; Michael D Carter; Heidi L Sapp; Ashley E Stueck; Thomas Arnason; Jeanette Boudreau; Arun Seth; Weei-Yuarn Huang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Update of the recommendations for the determination of biomarkers in colorectal carcinoma: National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology.

Authors:  P García-Alfonso; R García-Carbonero; J García-Foncillas; P Pérez-Segura; R Salazar; R Vera; S Ramón Y Cajal; J Hernández-Losa; S Landolfi; E Musulén; M Cuatrecasas; S Navarro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 3.405

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.