Literature DB >> 28984375

Context matters when striving to promote active and lifelong learning in medical education.

Joris J Berkhout1, Esther Helmich2, Pim W Teunissen3,4, Cees P M van der Vleuten3, A Debbie C Jaarsma2.   

Abstract

WHERE DO WE STAND NOW?: In the 30 years that have passed since The Edinburgh Declaration on Medical Education, we have made tremendous progress in research on fostering 'self-directed and independent study' as propagated in this declaration, of which one prime example is research carried out on problem-based learning. However, a large portion of medical education happens outside of classrooms, in authentic clinical contexts. Therefore, this article discusses recent developments in research regarding fostering active learning in clinical contexts. SELF-REGULATED, LIFELONG LEARNING IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: Clinical contexts are much more complex and flexible than classrooms, and therefore require a modified approach when fostering active learning. Recent efforts have been increasingly focused on understanding the more complex subject of supporting active learning in clinical contexts. One way of doing this is by using theory regarding self-regulated learning (SRL), as well as situated learning, workplace affordances, self-determination theory and achievement goal theory. Combining these different perspectives provides a holistic view of active learning in clinical contexts. ENTRY TO PRACTICE, VOCATIONAL TRAINING AND CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: Research on SRL in clinical contexts has mostly focused on the undergraduate setting, showing that active learning in clinical contexts requires not only proficiency in metacognition and SRL, but also in reactive, opportunistic learning. These studies have also made us aware of the large influence one's social environment has on SRL, the importance of professional relationships for learners, and the role of identity development in learning in clinical contexts. Additionally, research regarding postgraduate lifelong learning also highlights the importance of learners interacting about learning in clinical contexts, as well as the difficulties that clinical contexts may pose for lifelong learning. However, stimulating self-regulated learning in undergraduate medical education may also make postgraduate lifelong learning easier for learners in clinical contexts.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28984375     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  21 in total

1.  Feasibility Study of a Fully Synchronous Virtual Critical Care Elective Focused on Learner Engagement.

Authors:  Soyun Michelle Hwang; Ambrose Rice; Serkan Toy; Rachel Levine; Lee Goeddel
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-28

2.  The blacksmith approach: a strategy for teaching and learning in the medical anatomy course (a qualitative study).

Authors:  Arash Shojaei; Amin Feili; Javad Kojuri; Ali Norafshan; Leila Bazrafkan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.263

3.  Comparison of the evaluation of formative assessment at two medical faculties with different conditions of undergraduate training, assessment and feedback.

Authors:  Katrin Schüttpelz-Brauns; Yassin Karay; Johann Arias; Kirsten Gehlhar; Michaela Zupanic
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2020-06-15

4.  How is self-regulated learning documented in e-portfolios of trainees? A content analysis.

Authors:  R van der Gulden; S Heeneman; A W M Kramer; R F J M Laan; N D Scherpbier-de Haan; B P A Thoonen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Trainee-environment interactions that stimulate motivation: A rich pictures study.

Authors:  Wieke E van der Goot; Sayra M Cristancho; Marco Antonio de Carvalho Filho; A Debbie C Jaarsma; Esther Helmich
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Contention over undergraduate medical curriculum content.

Authors:  Stig Andersen; Diana Stentoft; Jeppe Emmersen; Sten Rasmussen; Svend Birkelund; Susanne Nøhr
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2019-12-16

7.  Professionals' perspectives on factors affecting GP trainees' patient mix: results from an interview and focus group study among professionals working in Dutch general practice.

Authors:  Sarah de Bever; Suzanne C van Rhijn; Nynke van Dijk; Anneke Kramer; Mechteld R M Visser
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Limited effects from professional identity formation-oriented intervention on self-regulated learning in a preclinical setting: a randomized-controlled study in Japan.

Authors:  Yasushi Matsuyama; Motoyuki Nakaya; Jimmie Leppink; Cees van der Vleuten; Yoshikazu Asada; Adam Jon Lebowitz; Teppei Sasahara; Yu Yamamoto; Masami Matsumura; Akira Gomi; Shizukiyo Ishikawa; Hitoaki Okazaki
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Learning in the workplace: Use of informal feedback cues in doctor-patient communication.

Authors:  Carolin Sehlbach; Pim W Teunissen; Erik W Driessen; Sharon Mitchell; Gernot G U Rohde; Frank W J M Smeenk; Marjan J B Govaerts
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Beyond the self: The role of co-regulation in medical students' self-regulated learning.

Authors:  Derk Bransen; Marjan J B Govaerts; Dominique M A Sluijsmans; Erik W Driessen
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 6.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.