Literature DB >> 28984356

A Real-World Analysis of Migraine: A Cross-Sectional Study of Disease Burden and Treatment Patterns.

Janet H Ford1, James Jackson2, Gary Milligan2, Sarah Cotton2, Jonna Ahl1, Sheena K Aurora1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess the sociodemographics, disease burden, and treatment patterns of patients with episodic and chronic migraine in the United States.
BACKGROUND: Migraine is a disabling neurological disease that places an enormous burden on patients.
METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Migraine United States Disease Specific Programme (index period: January to March 2014). Physicians (N = 150) completed a patient report form on 10 consulting patients with migraine. Episodic migraineurs had ≤14 headache days per month (HDM) and those with chronic migraine had ≥15. Headache-related disability was assessed with the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire. Disability was also compared across subgroups based on the number of HDM (≤3, 4-7, 8-14, and ≥15).
RESULTS: A total of 1487 patient report forms were completed. Over 70% of the patients were female, 90.8% (n = 1350) were episodic migraineurs, and 9.2% (n = 137) were chronic migraineurs. Acute treatment was prescribed for >90% of the patients, and >50% had a current prescription for preventive treatment. Despite taking acute and/or preventive treatment, 29.2% of episodic migraineurs (including some patients with ≤3 headache days/month) and 73.2% of chronic migraineurs had moderate-to-severe headache-related disability (MIDAS total score ≥11). Preventive treatment was discontinued/switched at least once by 26.4% of episodic migraineurs and by 53.3% of chronic migraineurs. Of those patients (n = 382) who gave collective reasons for discontinuation/switching preventive treatment, over 70% selected lack of efficacy and tolerability/safety.
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis provides additional support for the unmet medical need for efficacious therapies that reduce migraine frequency and severity, headache-related disability, and have better tolerability for patients with migraine. In addition, further research is needed to better understand the burden of illness among patients with lower migraine frequency, and to implement treatment strategies to prevent progression of the disease.
© 2017 American Headache Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disease burden; migraine; real-world; treatment patterns

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28984356     DOI: 10.1111/head.13202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Headache        ISSN: 0017-8748            Impact factor:   5.887


  24 in total

1.  Long-term reductions in disease impact in patients with chronic migraine following preventive treatment with eptinezumab.

Authors:  Andrew Blumenfeld; Anders Ettrup; Joe Hirman; Bjarke Ebert; Roger Cady
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Persistence, use of resources and costs in patients under migraine preventive treatment: the PERSEC study.

Authors:  Pablo Irimia; David García-Azorín; Mercedes Núñez; Sílvia Díaz-Cerezo; Pepa García de Polavieja; Tommaso Panni; Aram Sicras-Navarro; Antoni Sicras-Mainar; Antonio Ciudad
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 8.588

3.  A non-convulsant delta-opioid receptor agonist, KNT-127, reduces cortical spreading depression and nitroglycerin-induced allodynia.

Authors:  Zachariah Bertels; Wiktor D Witkowski; Sarah Asif; Kendra Siegersma; Richard M van Rijn; Amynah A Pradhan
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 5.887

4.  Neuronal complexity is attenuated in preclinical models of migraine and restored by HDAC6 inhibition.

Authors:  Zachariah Bertels; Harinder Singh; Isaac Dripps; Kendra Siegersma; Alycia F Tipton; Wiktor D Witkowski; Zoie Sheets; Pal Shah; Catherine Conway; Elizaveta Mangutov; Mei Ao; Valentina Petukhova; Bhargava Karumudi; Pavel A Petukhov; Serapio M Baca; Mark M Rasenick; Amynah A Pradhan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for preventive treatment of migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiuyuan Zhao; Xiaolin Xu; Qingyun Li
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Failure of preventive treatments in migraine: an observational retrospective study in a tertiary headache center.

Authors:  Marianna Delussi; Eleonora Vecchio; Giuseppe Libro; Silvia Quitadamo; Marina de Tommaso
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  Migraine treatment and healthcare costs: retrospective analysis of the China Health Insurance Research Association (CHIRA) database.

Authors:  Shengyuan Yu; Yanlei Zhang; Yuan Yao; Haijun Cao
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 7.277

8.  Real-world treatment patterns and patient-reported outcomes in episodic and chronic migraine in Japan: analysis of data from the Adelphi migraine disease specific programme.

Authors:  Kaname Ueda; Wenyu Ye; Louise Lombard; Atsushi Kuga; Yongin Kim; Sarah Cotton; James Jackson; Tamas Treuer
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 7.277

9.  Patients' perspective on the burden of migraine in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis of survey data in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Pamela Vo; Juanzhi Fang; Aikaterini Bilitou; Annik K Laflamme; Shaloo Gupta
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 7.277

10.  Shift from high-frequency to low-frequency episodic migraine in patients treated with Galcanezumab: results from two global randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Jakub Jedynak; Eric Eross; Astrid Gendolla; Mallikarjuna Rettiganti; Virginia L Stauffer
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 7.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.