Literature DB >> 28984052

Patterns of long-term use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Quebec observational study.

Antonios Douros1,2,3, Christel Renoux1,2, Janie Coulombe1,2, Samy Suissa1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies on long-term utilization of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) are scarce. We evaluated predictors of use and long-term persistence of NOACs in a real-world setting.
METHODS: This population-based cohort study used the computerized databases of the Canadian Province of Quebec's health insurance. Patients with a first NVAF diagnosis from 2011 until 2014 were included. A logistic regression model yielded adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for predictors of treatment initiation with NOACs versus VKAs. Cox proportional hazards models yielded adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for predictors of switching from VKAs to NOACs versus remaining on VKAs, and for predictors of discontinuation of anticoagulation treatment.
RESULTS: Of the 62 867 newly diagnosed NVAF patients, 14 646 initiated NOACs and 17 685 VKAs. Initiation with NOACs was less likely for patients ≥ 80 years old (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.73) or with CHA2 DS2 -VASc ≥ 2 (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.42-0.57). Switching from VKAs to NOACs was less likely for patients with chronic kidney disease (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.48-0.59). After 3 years, persistence was 54% with NOACs and 25% with VKAs. Discontinuation of anticoagulation treatment was less likely for patients ≥ 80 years old (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.40-0.55) or with CHA2 DS2 -VASc ≥ 2 (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57-0.70).
CONCLUSIONS: Older, high-risk patients are less likely to initiate NOACs than VKAs. NOAC users show a higher long-term persistence than VKA users, and older, high-risk patients are less likely to discontinue anticoagulation treatment.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drug utilization; pharmacoepidemiology; treatment persistence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28984052     DOI: 10.1002/pds.4333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  11 in total

1.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Antonios Douros; Madeleine Durand; Carla M Doyle; Sarah Yoon; Pauline Reynier; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Drug interaction as a predictor of direct oral anticoagulant drug levels in atrial fibrillation patients.

Authors:  Bruria Hirsh Raccah; Amihai Rottenstreich; Netanel Zacks; Mordechai Muszkat; Ilan Matok; Amichai Perlman; Yosef Kalish
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Efficacy and Safety of Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and History of Falls or Risk of Falls: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Thibaut Galvain; Ruaraidh Hill; Sarah Donegan; Paulo Lisboa; Gregory Y H Lip; Gabriela Czanner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.228

4.  Risk of fracture in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation initiating direct oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists.

Authors:  Na He; Sophie Dell'Aniello; Suodi Zhai; Samy Suissa; Christel Renoux
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother       Date:  2021-09-21

5.  Oral anticoagulation therapy use in patients with atrial fibrillation after the introduction of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: findings from the French healthcare databases, 2011-2016.

Authors:  Géric Maura; Cécile Billionnet; Jérôme Drouin; Alain Weill; Anke Neumann; Antoine Pariente
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Persistence of oral anticoagulant treatment for atrial fibrillation in the Netherlands: A surveillance study.

Authors:  Gilda Denise Zielinski; Nienke van Rein; Martina Teichert; Frederikus A Klok; Frits R Rosendaal; Felix J M van der Meer; Menno V Huisman; Suzanne C Cannegieter; Willem M Lijfering
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2019-10-24

7.  Long-Term Medication Adherence Trajectories to Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Jaejin An; Zoe Bider; Tiffany Q Luong; T Craig Cheetham; Daniel T Lang; Heidi Fischer; Kristi Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Non-bleeding Adverse Events with the Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Sequence Symmetry Analysis.

Authors:  Géric Maura; Cécile Billionnet; Joël Coste; Alain Weill; Anke Neumann; Antoine Pariente
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Supporting anticoagulant treatment decision making to optimise stroke prevention in complex patients with atrial fibrillation: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Andrew Hayen; Dominic Y C Leung; Nicholas A Zwar; John M Worthington
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Evidence-Practice Gaps in Postdischarge Initiation With Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Andrea L Schaffer; Michael O Falster; David Brieger; Louisa R Jorm; Andrew Wilson; Melanie Hay; Kira Leeb; Sallie Pearson; Arthur Nasis
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.