Literature DB >> 28983449

Measurement Equivalence of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) Pain Interference Short Form Items: Application to Ethnically Diverse Cancer and Palliative Care Populations.

Jeanne A Teresi1,2,3, Katja Ocepek-Welikson2, Karon F Cook4, Marjorie Kleinman1, Mildred Ramirez2,3, M Carrington Reid3, Albert Siu5.   

Abstract

Reducing the response burden of standardized pain measures is desirable, particularly for individuals who are frail or live with chronic illness, e.g., those suffering from cancer and those in palliative care. The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) project addressed this issue with the provision of computerized adaptive tests (CAT) and short form measures that can be used clinically and in research. Although there has been substantial evaluation of PROMIS item banks, little is known about the performance of PROMIS short forms, particularly in ethnically diverse groups. Reviewed in this article are findings related to the differential item functioning (DIF) and reliability of the PROMIS pain interference short forms across diverse sociodemographic groups.
METHODS: DIF hypotheses were generated for the PROMIS short form pain interference items. Initial analyses tested item response theory (IRT) model assumptions of unidimensionality and local independence. Dimensionality was evaluated using factor analytic methods; local dependence (LD) was tested using IRT-based LD indices. Wald tests were used to examine group differences in IRT parameters, and to test DIF hypotheses. A second DIF-detection method used in sensitivity analyses was based on ordinal logistic regression with a latent IRT-derived conditioning variable. Magnitude and impact of DIF were investigated, and reliability and item and scale information statistics were estimated.
RESULTS: The reliability of the short form item set was excellent. However, there were a few items with high local dependency, which affected the estimation of the final discrimination parameters. As a result, the item, "How much did pain interfere with enjoyment of social activities?" was excluded in the DIF analyses for all subgroup comparisons. No items were hypothesized to show DIF for race and ethnicity; however, five items showed DIF after adjustment for multiple comparisons in both primary and sensitivity analyses: ability to concentrate, enjoyment of recreational activities, tasks away from home, participation in social activities, and socializing with others. The magnitude of DIF was small and the impact negligible. Three items were consistently identified with DIF for education: enjoyment of life, ability to concentrate, and enjoyment of recreational activities. No item showed DIF above the magnitude threshold and the impact of DIF on the overall measure was minimal. No item showed gender DIF after correction for multiple comparisons in the primary analyses. Four items showed consistent age DIF: enjoyment of life, ability to concentrate, day to day activities, and enjoyment of recreational activities, none with primary magnitude values above threshold. Conditional on the pain state, Spanish speakers were hypothesized to report less pain interference on one item, enjoyment of life. The DIF findings confirmed the hypothesis; however, the magnitude was small. Using an arbitrary cutoff point of theta (θ) ≥ 1.0 to classify respondents with acute pain interference, the highest number of changes were for the education groups analyses. There were 231 respondents (4% of the total sample) who changed from the designation of no acute pain interference to acute interference after the DIF adjustment. There was no change in the designations for race/ethnic subgroups, and a small number of changes for respondents aged 65 to 84.
CONCLUSIONS: Although significant DIF was observed after correction for multiple comparisons, all DIF was of low magnitude and impact. However, some individual-level impact was observed for low education groups. Reliability estimates were high. Thus, the PROMIS short form pain items examined in this ethnically diverse sample performed relatively well; although one item was problematic and removed from the analyses. It is concluded that the majority of the PROMIS pain interference short form items can be recommended for use among ethnically diverse groups, including those in palliative care and with cancer and chronic illness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Differential item functioning; PROMIS®; cancer; ethnicity; measurement equivalence; pain; palliative care

Year:  2016        PMID: 28983449      PMCID: PMC5625836     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Test Assess Model        ISSN: 2190-0493


  26 in total

1.  Test bias in a cognitive test: differential item functioning in the CASI.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Gerald van Belle; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Orlando Edelen; David Thissen; Jeanne A Teresi; Marjorie Kleinman; Katja Ocepek-Welikson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment.

Authors:  Harald Breivik; Beverly Collett; Vittorio Ventafridda; Rob Cohen; Derek Gallacher
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; Emily C Johnson; Phillip W Braddy
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2008-05

6.  Differential item functioning analysis with ordinal logistic regression techniques. DIFdetect and difwithpar.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons; Lance Jolley; Gerald van Belle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Computerized adaptive testing in back pain: validation of the CAT-5D-QOL.

Authors:  Jacek A Kopec; Maziar Badii; Mario McKenna; Viviane D Lima; Eric C Sayre; Marcel Dvorak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Chronic pain in Canada--prevalence, treatment, impact and the role of opioid analgesia.

Authors:  Dwight E Moulin; Alexander J Clark; Mark Speechley; Patricia K Morley-Forster
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.

Authors:  Darren A DeWalt; Nan Rothrock; Susan Yount; Arthur A Stone
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  7 in total

1.  The prevalence and risk of symptom and function clusters in colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Arnold L Potosky; Kristi D Graves; Li Lin; Wei Pan; Jane M Fall-Dickson; Jaeil Ahn; Kristin M Ferguson; Theresa H M Keegan; Lisa E Paddock; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Rosemary Cress; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Cancer-related loneliness mediates the relationships between social constraints and symptoms among cancer patients.

Authors:  Rebecca N Adams; Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Rafat Abonour; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-10-05

3.  Considerations to Support Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric Measures in Ambulatory Clinics.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Cox; Sarah K Dobrozsi; Christopher B Forrest; Wendy E Gerhardt; Harald Kliems; Bryce B Reeve; Nan E Rothrock; Jin-Shei Lai; Jacob M Svenson; Lindsay A Thompson; Thuy Dan N Tran; Carole A Tucker
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Classification and Prediction of Post-Trauma Outcomes Related to PTSD Using Circadian Rhythm Changes Measured via Wrist-Worn Research Watch in a Large Longitudinal Cohort.

Authors:  Ayse S Cakmak; Erick A Perez Alday; Giulia Da Poian; Ali Bahrami Rad; Thomas J Metzler; Thomas C Neylan; Stacey L House; Francesca L Beaudoin; Xinming An; Jennifer S Stevens; Donglin Zeng; Sarah D Linnstaedt; Tanja Jovanovic; Laura T Germine; Kenneth A Bollen; Scott L Rauch; Christopher A Lewandowski; Phyllis L Hendry; Sophia Sheikh; Alan B Storrow; Paul I Musey; John P Haran; Christopher W Jones; Brittany E Punches; Robert A Swor; Nina T Gentile; Meghan E McGrath; Mark J Seamon; Kamran Mohiuddin; Anna M Chang; Claire Pearson; Robert M Domeier; Steven E Bruce; Brian J O'Neil; Niels K Rathlev; Leon D Sanchez; Robert H Pietrzak; Jutta Joormann; Deanna M Barch; Diego A Pizzagalli; Steven E Harte; James M Elliott; Ronald C Kessler; Karestan C Koenen; Kerry J Ressler; Samuel A Mclean; Qiao Li; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 7.021

5.  Age Significantly Affects Response Rate to Outcomes Questionnaires Using Mobile Messaging Software.

Authors:  Toufic R Jildeh; Joshua P Castle; Muhammad J Abbas; Miriam E Dash; Noel O Akioyamen; Kelechi R Okoroha
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-05

6.  How Long Does It Take for Patients to Complete PROMIS Scores?: An Assessment of PROMIS CAT Questionnaires Administered at an Ambulatory Sports Medicine Clinic.

Authors:  Omar Kadri; Toufic R Jildeh; Jason E Meldau; Jacob Blanchett; Peter Borowsky; Stephanie Muh; Vasilios Moutzouros; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-08-14

7.  Further Evidence That OPG rs2073618 Is Associated With Increased Risk of Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Patients Receiving Aromatase Inhibitors for Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Karen Lisa Smith; Yuhua Zong; Christina L Gersch; Andrea M Pesch; Jennifer Lehman; Amanda L Blackford; N Lynn Henry; Kelley M Kidwell; James M Rae; Vered Stearns
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.