Literature DB >> 28983437

100 Metrics to Assess and Communicate the Value of Biomedical Research: An Ideas Book.

Susan Guthrie, Joachim Krapels, Catherine A Lichten, Steven Wooding.   

Abstract

Biomedical research affects society in many ways. It has been shown to improve health, create jobs, add to our knowledge, and foster new collaborations. Despite the complexity of modern research, many of the metrics used to evaluate the impacts of research still focus on the traditional, often academic, part of the research pathway, covering areas such as the amount of grant funding received and the number of peer-reviewed publications. In response to increasing expectations of accountability and transparency, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), in collaboration with RAND Europe, undertook a project to help communicate the wider value of biomedical research. The initiative developed resources to support academic medical centers in evaluating the outcomes and impacts of their research using approaches relevant to various stakeholders, including patients, providers, administrators, and legislators. This study presents 100 ideas for metrics that can be used to assess and communicate the value of biomedical research. The list is not comprehensive, and the metrics are not fully developed, but they should serve to stimulate and broaden thinking about how academic medical centers can communicate the value of their research to a broad range of stakeholders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bibliometrics; Biomedical Research; Science of Science

Year:  2017        PMID: 28983437      PMCID: PMC5627643     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rand Health Q        ISSN: 2162-8254


  3 in total

1.  Shifting Academic Health Centers From a Culture of Community Service to Community Engagement and Integration.

Authors:  Consuelo H Wilkins; Philip M Alberti
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Evidencing the impact of cancer trials: insights from the 2014 UK Research Excellence Framework.

Authors:  Catherine R Hanna; Lauren P Gatting; Kathleen Anne Boyd; Kathryn A Robb; Rob J Jones
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  What was the impact of a participatory research project in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare services? Applying a comprehensive framework for assessing translational health research to Lessons for the Best.

Authors:  Shanthi Ann Ramanathan; Sarah Larkins; Karen Carlisle; Nalita Turner; Ross Stewart Bailie; Sandra Thompson; Roxanne Bainbridge; Simon Deeming; Andrew Searles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.