| Literature DB >> 28983298 |
A Pedro Gonçalves1, Jens Heller1, Asen Daskalov1, Arnaldo Videira2,3, N Louise Glass1.
Abstract
Cell death occurs in all domains of life. While some cells die in an uncontrolled way due to exposure to external cues, other cells die in a regulated manner as part of a genetically encoded developmental program. Like other eukaryotic species, fungi undergo programmed cell death (PCD) in response to various triggers. For example, exposure to external stress conditions can activate PCD pathways in fungi. Calcium redistribution between the extracellular space, the cytoplasm and intracellular storage organelles appears to be pivotal for this kind of cell death. PCD is also part of the fungal life cycle, in which it occurs during sexual and asexual reproduction, aging, and as part of development associated with infection in phytopathogenic fungi. Additionally, a fungal non-self-recognition mechanism termed heterokaryon incompatibility (HI) also involves PCD. Some of the molecular players mediating PCD during HI show remarkable similarities to major constituents involved in innate immunity in metazoans and plants. In this review we discuss recent research on fungal PCD mechanisms in comparison to more characterized mechanisms in metazoans. We highlight the role of PCD in fungi in response to exogenic compounds, fungal development and non-self-recognition processes and discuss identified intracellular signaling pathways and molecules that regulate fungal PCD.Entities:
Keywords: BCL-2 family; NLR; ROS; calcium; filamentous fungi; metacaspases; programmed cell death
Year: 2017 PMID: 28983298 PMCID: PMC5613156 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Programmed Cell Death (PCD) in filamentous fungi. PCD has been reported to occur in filamentous fungi in response to various exogenic compounds, such as plant defense molecules (e.g., camalexin), toxins and fungicides (e.g., Penicillium AntiFungal protein), during non-self-recognition and heterokaryon incompatibility and during developmental programs throughout the fungal life cycle, including morphogenesis associated plant infection.
PCD in filamentous fungi during differentiation or developmental processes.
| Heterokaryon incompatibility | Yes | No | Saupe, | ||
| Senescent cultures | Yes | Yes | Dufour et al., | ||
| Appressorium morphogenesis | Several autophagy-related genes | NA | NA | Veneault-Fourrey et al., | |
| Protoperithecia formation | NA | NA | Pinan-Lucarre et al., | ||
| Asci maturation and ascospore formation | – | NA | NA | Raju and Perkins, | |
| Meiotic defects/Spore killer element | NA | NA | Raju, | ||
| Basidial differentiation | – | NA | NA | Umar and Griensven Van, | |
| Conidiation | NA | Yes | Thrane et al., |
Columns “ROS” and “MC” denote, for the effect of each stimulus, the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or metacaspases, respectively. NA, not assessed; Nc, N. crassa; Pa, P. anserina; Ns, N. sitophila; An, A. nidulans.
PCD in filamentous fungi exposed to cell death-inducing stimuli.
| Dihydrosphingosine | – | NA | NA | NA | Cheng et al., | |
| Phytosphingosine | No | Yes | Yes | Cheng et al., | ||
| Ceramide | – | NA | NA | NA | Plesofsky et al., | |
| Amphotericin B | – | Yes | NA | No | Bowman et al., | |
| Caspofungin | – | NA | NA | NA | Bowman et al., | |
| Itraconazole | – | NA | Yes | Yes | Shirazi and Kontoyiannis, | |
| Posaconazole | – | NA | Yes | Yes | Shirazi and Kontoyiannis, | |
| Chitosan | Yes | NA | NA | Palma-Guerrero et al., | ||
| Camalexin | NA | Yes | NA | Shlezinger et al., | ||
| Hexanoic (caproic) acid | NA | NA | NA | Finkelshtein et al., | ||
| α-Tomatine | – | Yes | Yes | Yes | Ito et al., | |
| Sugarwin2 | – | NA | NA | NA | Franco et al., | |
| Dill oil | – | NA | Yes | NA | Tian et al., | |
| Anethole | – | NA | Yes | Yes | Fujita et al., | |
| Defensins | Yes | NA | NA | Munoz et al., | ||
| Anacardic acid | NA | No | No | Muzaffar et al., | ||
| Perillaldehyde | – | Yes | Yes | Yes | Tian et al., | |
| PAF | Yes | Yes | NA | Leiter et al., | ||
| Trichokonin VI | – | Yes | No | No | Shi et al., | |
| Ophiobolin A | – | NA | NA | NA | Krizsan et al., | |
| L-amino acid oxidase | – | NA | Yes | NA | Cheng et al., | |
| Lovastatin | NA | NA | NA | Roze and Linz, | ||
| Farnesol | NA | Yes | Yes | Semighini et al., | ||
| Staurosporine | Yes | Yes | No | Castro et al., | ||
| WH1 fungin | – | NA | Yes | Yes | Qi et al., | |
| PAF26, PAF95, PAF96 | – | Yes | NA | NA | Munoz et al., | |
| D(KLAKLAK)2 | – | NA | Yes | Yes | Barbu et al., | |
| Hydrogen peroxide | Yes | Yes | No | Mousavi and Robson, | ||
| Paraquat | NA | Yes | NA | Duarte and Videira, | ||
| Cu2+ | – | NA | Yes | Yes | Azevedo et al., | |
| Zn2+ | – | NA | Yes | Yes | Azevedo et al., | |
| Cr (VI) | – | NA | Yes | NA | Gaddameedi et al., | |
| Water (7 days) | NA | NA | NA | Finkelshtein et al., | ||
| Salt (NaCl) | NA | Yes | NA | Adam et al., | ||
| Hyperosmotic stress | NA | Yes | NA | Adam et al., | ||
| Ultraviolet light | – | NA | Yes | NA | Chen and Dickman, | |
| Photodynamic inhibition (aPI) | – | NA | Yes | NA | Baltazar Lde et al., | |
| Carbon starvation | NA | Yes | Yes | Mousavi and Robson, | ||
| Iron starvation | – | NA | Yes | Yes | Shirazi et al., | |
| Auxotrophic strains | – | NA | Yes | NA | Strauss, | |
| Dominant activated Ras | NA | Yes | NA | Chen and Dickman, | ||
| Δ | Yes | NA | No | Li et al., | ||
| Δ | NA | NA | NA | Tao et al., | ||
| Kalilo plasmid-bearing strains | – | NA | NA | NA | Griffiths et al., | |
| Human BAX expression | – | NA | NA | NA | Barhoom and Sharon, | |
| Heat (42°C) | – | NA | Yes | NA | Song et al., | |
| Moderate heat shock (45°C) + glucose deprivation (2-deoxyglucose) | NA | NA | NA | Plesofsky-Vig and Brambl, | ||
| Confrontation assays | NA | Yes | NA | Silar, | ||
In combination with tacrolimus, antimycin A or benzohydroxamate (Shirazi and Kontoyiannis, .
A double mutant strain Δnde-1Δnde-2 is substantially more resistant to paraquat than wild type (Carneiro et al., .
Phytosphingosine induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) production although ROS scavenging does not block cell death.
Only ΔcasA was tested and A. nidulans also possesses casB.
Although alterations in the intracellular levels of Ca.
Treatment with anacardic acid caused a decrease in ROS accumulation instead of the common increase in ROS observed for other compounds (Muzaffar et al., .
Figure 2Model for Ca2+ transport and signaling involved in cell death in filamentous fungi. Model for staurosporine induced modifications in intracellular Ca2+ dynamics that precede induction of cell death in N. crassa (Goncalves et al., 2014a). The phospholipase C-family protein PLC-2 plays a pivotal role during the process, which occurs via the recruitment of Ca2+ from the extracellular space, through a TRP-like channel via store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) and from internal stores such as the endoplasmic reticulum (via a IP3-activated channel) or the mitochondria; ROS formation is necessary for the recruitment of Ca2+ to the cytosol (Goncalves et al., 2015). Vacuoles, other acidic vesicles, the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria uptake Ca2+ to buffer the concentration of ions in the cytosol. The antifungal peptides Penicillium AntiFungal (Binder et al., 2010) and PAF26 (Munoz et al., 2012) and 2,4- diacetylphloroglucinol (Troppens et al., 2013) also induce cell death and the recruitment of Ca2+ to the cytosol. In this case, Ca2+ recruitment occurs, at least partially, through L-type Ca2+ channels, which are affected by the stability of the intracellular F-actin network. The mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) regulates increases in intracellular Ca2+ during cell death (Munoz et al., 2012; Goncalves et al., 2015). Dashed arrows indicate that a relationship between the two elements has been suggested but not fully proven.
Figure 3NOD-like receptors control various forms of PCD in mammals and filamentous fungi. NLRP3 and APAF1, given as examples, control pyroptosis and apoptosis, respectively. NLRP3 activity is triggered by various DAMPs (damage-associated molecular patterns), which leads to highly inflammatory pyroptotic cell death (Jones et al., 2016). APAF1 controls the intrinsic apoptotic cell death pathway in mammals (Shakeri et al., 2017). APAF1 is activated by cytochrome C, released from damaged mitochondria. Three examples are given of fungal NOD-like receptors controlling PCD. HET-E controls the HI PCD reaction in the ascomycete P. anserina. PCD is triggered by incompatible allelic variants of HET-C, a glycolipid transfer protein (GLTP). The downstream signaling pathway of HET-E activation and specific mechanism of cell death are currently unclear. Some fungal NLRs (e.g., NWD2 of P. anserina or PNT1 of Chaetomium globosum) use short amyloid motifs (R0 or PP (pseudo-palindromic) respectively) to induce a cell death reaction that has been linked to necroptosis—inflammatory PCD in metazoans (Loquet and Saupe, 2017). The molecular cues and events activating NWD2 and PNT1 are not yet identified.