| Literature DB >> 28983171 |
Mohammad M Al-Daydamony1, Tamer M Moustafaa1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension is a common complication of rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS). Patients with similar mitral valve (MV) areas may have different pulmonary artery pressures. Net atrioventricular compliance (Cn) was found to play an important role in the development of pulmonary hypertension. AIM: To test the value of Cn in predicting persistent pulmonary artery hypertension (PPAH) after percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy (PMBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with severe MS, suitable for PMBC were included in the study. We excluded patients with contraindication to PMBC, atrial fibrillation, failure of PMBC, and restenosis. All patients had undergone electrocardiography, echocardiography with measurement of MV area, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP), and Cn, PMBC, and follow-up echocardiography.Entities:
Keywords: Left atrium; Mitral stenosis; Mitral valvuloplasty; Pulmonary hypertension
Year: 2017 PMID: 28983171 PMCID: PMC5623026 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2017.01.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Saudi Heart Assoc ISSN: 1016-7315
Figure 1ROC curve for Cn < 4.2 mL/mmHg with persistent pulmonary arterial hypertension. AUC = area under the curve; Cn = net atrioventricular compliance; ROC = receiver operating characteristic.
Clinical and echocardiographic data
| Cn < 4 mL/mmHg ( | Cn ≥ 4 mL/mmHg ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 41.1 ± 7.85 | 38.4 ± 7.93 | 0.132 |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 16 (44.4%) | 17 (38.6%) | 0.599 |
| Female | 20 (55.6%) | 27 (61.4%) | |
| NYHA class | |||
| II | 7 (19.4%) | 16 (36.4%) | 0.153 |
| III | 28 (77.8%) | 28 (63.6%) | |
| IV | 1 (2.8%) | 0 | |
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 75.3 ± 10.4 | 72.5 ± 9.6 | 0.219 |
| LA diameter (mm) | 50.1 ± 5.42 | 48.9 ± 4.82 | 0.304 |
| LA volume (mL) | 126.4 ± 23.8 | 120.2 ± 28.3 | 0.29 |
| RA volume (mL) | 72.3 ± 16.5 | 66.8 ± 17.1 | 0.149 |
| RVEDV (mL) | 121.1 ± 23.6 | 112.4 ± 22.8 | 0.101 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 46.3 ± 6.43 | 47.1 ± 5.61 | 0.559 |
| LVESD (mm) | 30.1 ± 3.88 | 30.7 ± 4.33 | 0.516 |
| FS (%) | 35.4 ± 3.47 | 34.8 ± 3.86 | 0.587 |
| EF (%) | 65.3 ± 4.45 | 64.4 ± 4.29 | 0.535 |
| Peak TMG (mmHg) | 25.4 ± 11.6 | 23.9 ± 10.5 | 0.572 |
| Mean TMG (mmHg) | 13.2 ± 6.12 | 12.1 ± 4.82 | 0.331 |
| EOA (cm2) | 0.87 ± 0.285 | 0.92 ± 0.279 | 0.715 |
| Cn (mL/mmHg) | |||
| Baseline | 3.13 ± 0.47 | 4.81 ± 0.51 | < 0.00001 |
| After PMBC | 3.14 ± 0.51 | 5.23 ± 0.62 | < 0.00001 |
| After 1 month | 3.22 ± 0.57 | 5.51 ± 0.68 | < 0.00001 |
| After 6 months | 3.45 ± 0.61 | 6.21 ± 0.65 | < 0.00001 |
| Improvement (%) | 13.9 ± 7.52 | 26.5 ± 9.86 | < 0.00001 |
| MV area (cm2) | |||
| Baseline | 0.99 ± 0.213 | 1.03 ± 0.198 | 0.318 |
| After PMBC | 1.98 ± 0.288 | 2.09 ± 0.333 | 0.104 |
| After 1 month | 1.92 ± 0.321 | 2.01 ± 0.384 | 0.232 |
| After 6 months | 1.89 ± 0.283 | 1.96 ± 0.374 | 0.301 |
| SPAP (mmHg) | |||
| Baseline | 58.3 ± 14.6 | 49.9 ± 12.5 | 0.0078 |
| After PMBC | 44.4 ± 13.7 | 28.6 ± 8.78 | < 0.00001 |
| After 1 month | 44.5 ± 14.9 | 27.2 ± 9.44 | < 0.00001 |
| After 6 months | 47.3 ± 15.12 | 25.5 ± 9.18 | < 0.00001 |
| Reduction | 13.9 ± 7.54 | 21.2 ± 8.25 | < 0.00001 |
| Reduction (%) | 23.7 ± 12.67 | 42.7 ± 13.88 | < 0.00001 |
| PPAH | 31 (86.1%) | 6 (13.6%) | < 0.00001 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or n (%). Cn = net atrioventricular compliance; EF = ejection fraction; EOA = effective orifice area; FS = fractional shortening; LA = left atrial; LVEDD = left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVESD = left ventricular end-systolic dimension; MV = mitral valve; NYHA = New York Heart Association; PMBC = percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy; PPAH = persistent pulmonary artery hypertension; RA = right atrial; SPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure; TMG = transmitral gradient.
Validity Cn < 4.2 mL/mmHg in predicting PPAH
| Cn < 4.2 mL/mmHg | Cn ≥ 4.2 mL/mmHg | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPAH | 32 | 5 | 37 |
| No PPAH | 4 | 39 | 43 |
| Total | 36 | 44 | 80 |
Cn = net atrioventricular compliance; NPV = negative predictive value; PPAH = persistent pulmonary artery hypertension; PPV = positive predictive value.
Logistic regression analysis for independent predictors of PPAH
| Variables | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline Cn | 6.19 | 4.59–7.83 | 0.0027 |
| Cn improvement | 5.41 | 4.23–6.59 | 0.0085 |
| Baseline SPAP | 2.99 | 1.65–4.33 | 0.0771 |
| LA volume | 2.45 | 1.04–3.86 | 0.103 |
| Baseline MV area | 1.58 | 0.83–2.32 | 0.314 |
CI = confidence interval; Cn = net atrioventricular compliance; LA = left atrial; MV = mitral valve; PPAH = persistent pulmonary artery hypertension; SPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Figure 2Correlation between Cn and baseline SPAP. Cn = net atrioventricular compliance; SPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Figure 3Correlation between Cn and SPAP reduction. Cn = net atrioventricular compliance; SPAP = systolic pulmonary artery pressure.