Literature DB >> 28983071

Effects of health-oriented descriptors on combustible cigarette and electronic cigarette packaging: an experiment among adult smokers in the United States.

Ashley Sanders-Jackson1, Andy S L Tan2,3, Kyeungyeun Yie1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Certain tobacco companies use health-oriented descriptors (eg, 100% organic) on product packaging and advertising of combustible cigarettes or electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) that create a 'health halo' around smoking and vaping. Previous observational research suggests that such language may be associated with more favourable attitudes and reduced risk perceptions toward these brands compared with others. This study aimed to determine the effects of health-oriented descriptors on smokers' attitude toward the brand, perception of packaging information, comparative harm versus other brands and intention to purchase either combustible cigarettes or e-cigarettes.
METHOD: US adult smokers were randomly assigned to view either a health-oriented language package ('100% organic,' 'all natural' or 'no additives'), traditional marketing language package ('fine quality,' 'premium blend' or '100% original') or a no-language package of a combustible cigarette brand (Study 1, n=405) or an e-cigarette brand (Study 2, n=396) in an experimental design.
RESULTS: Study 1: Participants in the health-oriented condition reported more favourable perceptions toward the package information, lower comparative harm and higher intention to purchase combustible cigarettes versus the no language control. In addition, participants in the health-oriented condition reported more positive attitude toward the brand and lower comparative harm versus the traditional marketing condition. Study 2: Compared with the traditional marketing condition, participants in the health-oriented condition reported greater intention to purchase Absolute e-cigarettes. There were no significant differences in attitude toward the brand, perception of packaging information and comparative harm versus other brands across conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of health-oriented language was significant for combustible cigarettesand e-cigarette packages. Policies to restrict health-oriented language on cigarette and e-cigarette packaging are recommended. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advertising and promotion; electronic nicotine delivery devices; packaging and labelling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28983071     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  5 in total

1.  Effects of E-cigarette Advertising Message Form and Cues on Cessation Intention: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Catherine L Jo; Seth M Noar; Brian G Southwell; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-07-12

2.  Widespread Belief That Organic and Additive-Free Tobacco Products are Less Harmful Than Regular Tobacco Products: Results From the 2017 US Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Jennifer L Pearson; Meghan Moran; Cristine D Delnevo; Andrea C Villanti; M Jane Lewis
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Naturally leading: a content analysis of terms, themes and word associations in Natural American Spirit advertising, 2000-2020.

Authors:  Stefanie K Gratale; Ollie Ganz; Olivia A Wackowski; M Jane Lewis
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.953

4.  Alternative Flavored Inhalable Products-A New Respiratory Hazard?

Authors:  Alayna P Tackett; Meghan E Rebuli
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.109

5.  Oral nicotine marketing claims in direct-mail advertising.

Authors:  Lauren Czaplicki; Minal Patel; Basmah Rahman; Stephanie Yoon; Barbara Schillo; Shyanika W Rose
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 6.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.