Literature DB >> 28983051

Interactions between brain and spinal cord mediate value effects in nocebo hyperalgesia.

A Tinnermann1, S Geuter2,3, C Sprenger2,4, J Finsterbusch2, C Büchel2.   

Abstract

Value information about a drug, such as the price tag, can strongly affect its therapeutic effect. We discovered that value information influences adverse treatment outcomes in humans even in the absence of an active substance. Labeling an inert treatment as expensive medication led to stronger nocebo hyperalgesia than labeling it as cheap medication. This effect was mediated by neural interactions between cortex, brainstem, and spinal cord. In particular, activity in the prefrontal cortex mediated the effect of value on nocebo hyperalgesia. Value furthermore modulated coupling between prefrontal areas, brainstem, and spinal cord, which might represent a flexible mechanism through which higher-cognitive representations, such as value, can modulate early pain processing.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28983051     DOI: 10.1126/science.aan1221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  46 in total

1.  The need to investigate nocebo effects in more detail.

Authors:  Fabrizio Benedetti; Elisa Frisaldi; Alessandro Piedimonte
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Shifted balance of dorsal versus ventral striatal communication with frontal reward and regulatory regions in cannabis-dependent males.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Kaeli Zimmermann; Fei Xin; Dirk Scheele; Wolfgang Dau; Markus Banger; Bernd Weber; René Hurlemann; Keith M Kendrick; Benjamin Becker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: A dual-process model informed by insights from cross-species comparisons.

Authors:  Scott M Schafer; Stephan Geuter; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 4.  Composite Pain Biomarker Signatures for Objective Assessment and Effective Treatment.

Authors:  Irene Tracey; Clifford J Woolf; Nick A Andrews
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Placebo Effects on the Neurologic Pain Signature: A Meta-analysis of Individual Participant Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.

Authors:  Matthias Zunhammer; Ulrike Bingel; Tor D Wager
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 18.302

6.  Nocebo effects can make you feel pain.

Authors:  Luana Colloca
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A neural mechanism of direct and observational conditioning for placebo and nocebo responses.

Authors:  Yiheng Tu; Joel Park; Seppo P Ahlfors; Sheraz Khan; Natalia Egorova; Courtney Lang; Jin Cao; Jian Kong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Threat Prediction from Schemas as a Source of Bias in Pain Perception.

Authors:  Manyoel Lim; Christopher O'Grady; Douglas Cane; Amita Goyal; Mary Lynch; Steven Beyea; Javeria Ali Hashmi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Manipulating placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia by changing brain excitability.

Authors:  Yiheng Tu; Georgia Wilson; Joan Camprodon; Darin D Dougherty; Mark Vangel; Fabrizio Benedetti; Ted J Kaptchuk; Randy L Gollub; Jian Kong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Temporal structure of brain oscillations predicts learned nocebo responses to pain.

Authors:  Mia A Thomaidou; Joseph S Blythe; Simon J Houtman; Dieuwke S Veldhuijzen; Antoinette I M van Laarhoven; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.