Literature DB >> 28982706

Neural Signature of Value-Based Sensorimotor Prioritization in Humans.

Annabelle Blangero1,2, Simon P Kelly3,4.   

Abstract

In situations in which impending sensory events demand fast action choices, we must be ready to prioritize higher-value courses of action to avoid missed opportunities. When such a situation first presents itself, stimulus-action contingencies and their relative value must be encoded to establish a value-biased state of preparation for an impending sensorimotor decision. Here, we sought to identify neurophysiological signatures of such processes in the human brain (both female and male). We devised a task requiring fast action choices based on the discrimination of a simple visual cue in which the differently valued sensory alternatives were presented 750-800 ms before as peripheral "targets" that specified the stimulus-action mapping for the upcoming decision. In response to the targets, we identified a discrete, transient, spatially selective signal in the event-related potential (ERP), which scaled with relative value and strongly predicted the degree of behavioral bias in the upcoming decision both across and within subjects. This signal is not compatible with any hitherto known ERP signature of spatial selection and also bears novel distinctions with respect to characterizations of value-sensitive, spatially selective activity found in sensorimotor areas of nonhuman primates. Specifically, a series of follow-up experiments revealed that the signal was reliably invoked regardless of response laterality, response modality, sensory feature, and reward valence. It was absent, however, when the response deadline was relaxed and the strategic need for biasing removed. Therefore, more than passively representing value or salience, the signal appears to play a versatile and active role in adaptive sensorimotor prioritization.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In many situations such as fast-moving sports, we must be ready to act fast in response to sensory events and, in our preparation, prioritize courses of action that lead to greater rewards. Although behavioral effects of value biases in sensorimotor decision making have been widely studied, little is known about the neural processes that set these biases in place beforehand. Here, we report the discovery of a transient, spatially selective neural signal in humans that encodes the relative value of competing decision alternatives and strongly predicts behavioral value biases in decisions made ∼500 ms later. Follow-up manipulations of value differential, reward valence, response modality, sensory features, and time constraints establish that the signal reflects an active, feature- and effector-general preparatory mechanism for value-based prioritization.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/3710725-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERP; decision making; human; sensorimotor; urgency; value bias

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28982706      PMCID: PMC5666589          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1164-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting.

Authors:  J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-02

Review 4.  From thought to action: the parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 5.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 6.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Automatic versus Choice-Dependent Value Representations in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Marcus Grueschow; Rafael Polania; Todd A Hare; Christian C Ruff
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Prestimulus oscillatory activity over motor cortex reflects perceptual expectations.

Authors:  Floris P de Lange; Dobromir A Rahnev; Tobias H Donner; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Neurobiology of economic choice: a good-based model.

Authors:  Camillo Padoa-Schioppa
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  In monkeys making value-based decisions, LIP neurons encode cue salience and not action value.

Authors:  Marvin L Leathers; Carl R Olson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.