Literature DB >> 28982560

Surgery Versus Transcatheter Interventions for Significant Paravalvular Prosthetic Leaks.

Xavier Millán1, Ismail Bouhout2, Anna Nozza3, Karla Samman1, Louis-Mathieu Stevens2, Yoan Lamarche2, Antonio Serra4, Anita W Asgar1, Ismail El-Hamamsy2, Raymond Cartier2, Michel Pellerin2, Stephane Noble5, Phillipe Demers2, Reda Ibrahim1, E Marc Jolicœur6, Denis Bouchard2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the relative merit of surgical correction (SC) versus transcatheter reduction on long-term outcomes in patients with significant paravalvular leak (PVL) refractory to medical therapy.
BACKGROUND: PVL is the most frequent dysfunction following prosthetic valve replacement. Although repeat surgery is the gold standard, transcatheter reduction (TR) of PVL has been associated with reduced mortality.
METHODS: From 1994 to 2014, 231 patients underwent SC (n = 151) or TR (n = 80) PVL correction. Propensity matching and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the effect of either intervention on long-term rates of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure. Survival after TR and SC were further compared with the survival in a matched general population and to matched patients undergoing their first surgical valve replacement.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 3.5 years, SC was associated with an important reduction in all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure compared with TR (hazard ratio: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.44; p < 0.001). There was a trend towards reduced all-cause death following SC versus TR (hazard ratio: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 1.02; p = 0.06). Neither intervention normalized survival when compared with a general population or patients undergoing their first surgical valve replacement.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with significant prosthetic PVL, surgery is associated with better long-term outcomes compared with transcatheter intervention, but results in important perioperative mortality and morbidity. Future studies are needed in the face of increasing implementation of transcatheter PVL interventions across the world.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac surgery; heart valve replacement; interventional cardiology; paravalvular leak; prosthetic heart valves

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28982560     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  4 in total

1.  Percutaneous Transapical Left Ventricular Access to Treat Paravalvular Leak and Ventricular Septal Defect.

Authors:  Joseph M Venturini; Isla McClelland; John E A Blair; Akhil Narang; Rohan Kalathiya; Roberto M Lang; Karima Addetia; Jonathan Paul; Sandeep Nathan; Atman P Shah
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.022

Review 2.  Cardiac prostheses-related hemolytic anemia.

Authors:  Mohamad Alkhouli; Ali Farooq; Ronald S Go; Sudarshan Balla; Chalak Berzingi
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and management of mitral paravalvular leakage.

Authors:  Mustafa Ozan Gürsoy; Ahmet Güner; Macit Kalçık; Emrah Bayam; Mehmet Özkan
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  A Comparison of the Catheter-Based Transapical and Surgical Treatment Modalities for Mitral Paravalvular Leak.

Authors:  Aleksejus Zorinas; Vilius Janušauskas; Donatas Austys; Giedrius Davidavičius; Lina Puodžiukaitė; Diana Zakarkaitė; Robertas Stasys Samalavičius; Karolis Urbonas; Rita Kramena; Eustaquio Maria Onorato; Kęstutis Ručinskas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.