| Literature DB >> 28982137 |
Marije Risselada1,2, Keith E Linder3, Emily Griffith1,4, Brittney V Roberts5, Gigi Davidson6, William C Zamboni5, Kristen M Messenger7.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneously delivered carboplatin in poloxamer 407 in rats. Carboplatin (5mg/rat) in 0.5ml poloxamer 407 (1.0 ml total volume) was administered subcutaneously in a right subcutaneous perineal incision in all 12 treatment rats. Three control rats received 1.0 ml of poloxamer 407. Total platinum was measured in plasma q24hrs from 0 to 168hrs. Protein-unbound platinum was measured in plasma at 168hrs. After sacrifice on day 7, total platinum was determined in wound bed muscle. Platinum concentrations in all samples were measured by ICP-MS. Wounds were visually assessed daily for 7 days. Perineal tissues (full wound bed including muscle, subcutis, skin) were assessed histologically and scored. Total platinum was detectable in plasma from 24 to 168 hrs. Total plasma platinum AUC and Cmax were 9,165.3 ng/mL•h and 129.4 ng/mL. Day 7 total platinum concentration in muscle was approximately 10-fold higher than total plasma platinum concentration. No unbound platinum was detected in plasma samples at 168 hours. No wound healing complications were detected at any time point, nor was tissue necrosis observed histologically. The results of this study suggest that subcutaneous carboplatin in poloxamer 407 can be used in vivo providing direct tissue exposure to carboplatin without significant local effects or systemic absorption and without wound healing complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28982137 PMCID: PMC5642013 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Plasma carboplatin time curve.
The concentration versus time curve (mean, standard deviation) of the systemically absorbed carboplatin is given as carboplatinplasma (ng/mL) 7 days. ‘●’ indicates the mean of all treatment groups combined.
Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameter of Pt.
| CP cohort | CP-μD cohort | CP and CP-μD cohorts combined | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Units | Median | Median | Median |
| AUClast | ng•h/mL | 11,918.1 | 7,938.8 | 9,165.3 |
| AUC%extrapolated | % | 8.4 | 9.2 | 8.4 |
| AUMClast | ng•h2/mL | 732,675.7 | 599,912.58 | 655,658.2 |
| Pt Cmax | ng/mL | 178.2 | 99.0 | 129.4 |
| Half-lifeλz | h | 33.4 | 34.2 | 34.0 |
| λz | 1/h | 0.02 | 0.0203 | 0.0203 |
| MRTlast | h | 61.5 | 73.5 | 67.8 |
| Tmax | h | 24.0 | 36 | 24 |
Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of carboplatin (Pt) in plasma after perineal SC administration in poloxamer copolymer gel. This table includes the results (median, minimum–maximum) for the individual cohorts, as well as the grouped results (median, minimum–maximum) for the CP [n = 6] and CP-μD [n = 6] cohorts [n = 12]. These groups were combined to allow a more robust analysis of the results. AUC, area under the curve from t = 0 to the last time point, AUC%extrapolated % AUC extrapolated to infinity, AUMClast = area under the first moment curve to the last time point, Cmax = maximum plasma concentration, half-lifeλz = terminal half-life, λz = elimination rate constant, MRTlast = mean residence time to the last time point, Tmax = time to maximum plasma concentration.
Fig 2Concentration of total Pt in plasma and total Pt in muscle at 168 hrs.
The carboplatin concentration (ng/mL) is plotted on the Y-axis in a logarithmic scale. ‘●’ and ‘▼’ represent the Ptplasma (n = 11)and Ptmuscle (n = 6) of every individual rat, respectively.
Fig 3Histology of the subcutaneous perineal implantation site.
A Shows a photomicrograph of the subcutaneous perineal surgical implantation site of rat from the CP cohort. Minimal necrosis of adipose (score = 1) (arrow) is present adjacent to the implantation site (asterisk). B Shows a photomicrograph of the subcutaneous perineal surgical implantation site of a rat from the CP-μD cohort. Minimal fibrosis (score = 1) (arrows) is present adjacent to the implantation site (asterisk) after receiving carboplatin and poloxamer 407 gel and a μD catheter (C) at the site.
Histological scores.
| Control (n = 3) | CP cohort (n = 6) | CP-μD cohort (n = 6) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score R | Difference R vs L | Score R | Difference R vs L | Score | Difference R vs L | |||
| Inflammation | 2 (2–2) | 2 (2–2) | 1.5 (1–2) | 1.5 (1–2) | 1.0 | 2 (1–2) | 2 (1–2) | 1.0 |
| Necrosis | 1 (1–1) | 1 (1–1) | 1 (1–3) | 1 (1–3) | 1.0 | 1 (0–2) | 1 (0–2) | 1.0 |
| Hemorrhage | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–3) | 0 (0–3) | 1.0 | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | |
| Edema | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 1 (1–3) | 1 (1–3) | 0.07 | 1.5 (1–3) | 1.5 (1–3) | 0.18 |
| Fibrin | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 1.5 (1–3) | 1.5 (1–3) | 0.18 | 1 (0–3) | 1 (0–3) | 0.64 |
| Fibrosis | 2 (2–2) | 2 (2–2) | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | 0.19 | 1 (1–2) | 1 (1–2) | 0.66 |
The median and ranges for the histologic scoring of the operated side (right side) are shown for the control group and all three groups separately, as well as all treated rats combined. The difference between the scores of the operated side vs the contralateral side (same rat) are shown “difference R vs L” and were used to compare between treatment cohorts and control rats (Fisher’s exact test) for which the p values are shown. CP: Carboplatin in poloxamer gel, μD: microdialyis catheter,
*All zero.