Siobhan Isles1, Grant Christey2, Ian Civil3, Peter Hicks4. 1. Major Trauma National Clinical Network, Auckland. 2. Clinical Director, Midland Trauma System, Hamilton. 3. National Clinical Lead, Major Trauma National Clinical Network. 4. Intensive Care, Capital & Coast District Health Board, Wellington.
Abstract
AIM: To describe the development of the New Zealand Major Trauma Registry (NZ-MTR) and the initial experiences of its use. METHOD: The background to the development of the NZ-MTR was reviewed and the processes undertaken to implement a single-instance of a web-based national registry described. A national minimum dataset was defined and utilised. Key structures to support the Registry such as a data governance group were established. RESULTS: The NZ-MTR was successfully implemented and is the foundation for a new, data-driven model of quality improvement. In its first year of operation over 1,300 patients were entered into the Registry although coverage is not yet universal. Overall incidence is 40.8 major trauma cases/100,000 population. The incidence in the Māori population was 69/100,000 compared with 31/100,000 in the non-Māori population. Case fatality rate was 9%. Three age peaks were observed at 20-24 years, 50-59 years and above 85 years. Road traffic crashes accounted for 50% of all caseload. A significant proportion of major trauma patients (21%) were transferred to one or more hospitals before reaching a definitive care facility. CONCLUSION: Despite the challenges working across multiple jurisdictions, initiation of a single-instance web-based registry has been achieved. The NZ-MTR enables New Zealand to have a national view of trauma treatment and outcomes for the first time. It will inform quality improvement and injury prevention initiatives and potentially decrease the burden of injury on all New Zealanders.
AIM: To describe the development of the New Zealand Major Trauma Registry (NZ-MTR) and the initial experiences of its use. METHOD: The background to the development of the NZ-MTR was reviewed and the processes undertaken to implement a single-instance of a web-based national registry described. A national minimum dataset was defined and utilised. Key structures to support the Registry such as a data governance group were established. RESULTS: The NZ-MTR was successfully implemented and is the foundation for a new, data-driven model of quality improvement. In its first year of operation over 1,300 patients were entered into the Registry although coverage is not yet universal. Overall incidence is 40.8 major trauma cases/100,000 population. The incidence in the Māori population was 69/100,000 compared with 31/100,000 in the non-Māori population. Case fatality rate was 9%. Three age peaks were observed at 20-24 years, 50-59 years and above 85 years. Road traffic crashes accounted for 50% of all caseload. A significant proportion of major traumapatients (21%) were transferred to one or more hospitals before reaching a definitive care facility. CONCLUSION: Despite the challenges working across multiple jurisdictions, initiation of a single-instance web-based registry has been achieved. The NZ-MTR enables New Zealand to have a national view of trauma treatment and outcomes for the first time. It will inform quality improvement and injury prevention initiatives and potentially decrease the burden of injury on all New Zealanders.
Authors: Adam Gyedu; Barclay Stewart; Cameron Gaskill; Peter Donkor; Robert Quansah; Charles Mock Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-11-02 Impact factor: 2.192