Literature DB >> 28980398

External validation of prediction models for time to death in potential donors after circulatory death.

A M M Kotsopoulos1, F Böing-Messing2, N E Jansen3, P Vos1, W F Abdo4.   

Abstract

Predicting time to death in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) donors following withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) is important but poses a major challenge. The aim of this study is to determine factors predicting time to circulatory death within 60 minutes after WSLT and validate previously developed prediction models. In a single-center retrospective study, we used the data of 92 potential cDCD donors. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that absent cough-, corneal reflex, lower morphine dosage, and midazolam use were significantly associated with death within 60 minutes (area under the curve [AUC] 0.89; 95% confidenence interval [CI] 0.87-0.91). External validation of the logistic regression models of de Groot et al (AUC 0.86; 95% CI 0.77-0.95), Wind et al (AUC 0.62; 95% CI 0.49-0.76), Davila et al (AUC 0.80; 95% CI 0.708-0.901) and the Cox regression model by Suntharalingam et al (Harrell's c-index 0.63), exhibited good discrimination and could fairly identify which patients died within 60 minutes. Previous prediction models did not incorporate the process of WLST. We believe that future studies should also include the process of WLST as an important predictor.
© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; donors and donation; donors and donation: donation after circulatory death (DCD); donors and donation: donor evaluation; organ transplantation in general

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28980398     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  5 in total

1.  Donation after circulatory determination of death in western Canada: a multicentre study of donor characteristics and critical care practices.

Authors:  Andreas H Kramer; Kerry Holliday; Sean Keenan; George Isac; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Norman M Kneteman; Adrian Robertson; Peter Nickerson; Lee Anne Tibbles
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Organ donation after circulatory death: current status and future potential.

Authors:  Martin Smith; B Dominguez-Gil; D M Greer; A R Manara; M J Souter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Predicting Time to Death After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures Using Vital Sign Variability: Derivation and Validation.

Authors:  Nathan B Scales; Christophe L Herry; Amanda van Beinum; Melanie L Hogue; Laura Hornby; Jason Shahin; Sonny Dhanani; Andrew J E Seely
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 4.  Predicting Time to Death After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Children.

Authors:  Meredith C Winter; David R Ledbetter
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  External Validation of the DCD-N Score and a Linear Prediction Model to Identify Potential Candidates for Organ Donation After Circulatory Death: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Maaike F Nijhoff; Robert A Pol; Meint Volbeda; Angela M M Kotsopoulos; Johan P C Sonneveld; Luuk Otterspoor; Wilson F Abdo; Vera M Silderhuis; Mostafa El Moumni; Cyril Moers
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.939

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.