Literature DB >> 28980325

Correlated Poisson models for age-period-cohort analysis.

Pavel Chernyavskiy1,2, Mark P Little1, Philip S Rosenberg2.   

Abstract

Age-period-cohort (APC) models are widely used to analyze population-level rates, particularly cancer incidence and mortality. These models are used for descriptive epidemiology, comparative risk analysis, and extrapolating future disease burden. Traditional APC models have 2 major limitations: (1) they lack parsimony because they require estimation of deviations from linear trends for each level of age, period, and cohort; and (2) rates observed at similar ages, periods, and cohorts are treated as independent, ignoring any correlations between them that may lead to biased parameter estimates and inefficient standard errors. We propose a novel approach to estimation of APC models using a spatially correlated Poisson model that accounts for over-dispersion and correlations in age, period, and cohort, simultaneously. We treat the outcome of interest as event rates occurring over a grid defined by values of age, period, and cohort. Rates defined in this manner lend themselves to well-established approaches from spatial statistics in which correlation among proximate observations may be modeled using a spatial random effect. Through simulations, we show that in the presence of spatial dependence and over-dispersion: (1) the correlated Poisson model attains lower AIC; (2) the traditional APC model produces biased trend parameter estimates; and (3) the correlated Poisson model corrects most of this bias. We illustrate our approach using brain and breast cancer incidence rates from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program of the United States. Our approach can be easily extended to accommodate comparative risk analyses and interpolation of cells in the Lexis with sparse data. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER; age-period-cohort analysis; cancer incidence; h-likelihood; spatial GLMM

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28980325      PMCID: PMC5768446          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  23 in total

1.  Age-period-cohort models: a comparative study of available methodologies.

Authors:  C Robertson; S Gandini; P Boyle
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates.

Authors:  T R Holford
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Appropriate assessment of neighborhood effects on individual health: integrating random and fixed effects in multilevel logistic regression.

Authors:  Klaus Larsen; Juan Merlo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Age-period-cohort models for the Lexis diagram.

Authors:  B Carstensen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimating average annual percent change for disease rates without assuming constant change.

Authors:  Michael P Fay; Ram C Tiwari; Eric J Feuer; Zhaohui Zou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Model selection for multi-component frailty models.

Authors:  Il Do Ha; Youngjo Lee; Gilbert MacKenzie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A unified approach for assessing heterogeneity in age-period-cohort model parameters using random effects.

Authors:  Pavel Chernyavskiy; Mark P Little; Philip S Rosenberg
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Trends in the Incidence of Fatal Prostate Cancer in the United States by Race.

Authors:  Scott P Kelly; Philip S Rosenberg; William F Anderson; Gabriella Andreotti; Naji Younes; Sean D Cleary; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Decomposing Black-White Disparities in Heart Disease Mortality in the United States, 1973-2010: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Michael R Kramer; Amy L Valderrama; Michele L Casper
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Ethnic differences in the time trend of female breast cancer incidence: Singapore, 1968-2002.

Authors:  Xueling Sim; R Ayesha Ali; Sara Wedren; Denise Li-Meng Goh; Chuen-Seng Tan; Marie Reilly; Per Hall; Kee-Seng Chia
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

1.  CP*Trends: An Online Tool for Comparing Cohort and Period Trends Across Cancer Sites.

Authors:  Theodore R Holford; Huann-Sheng Chen; David Annett; Martin Krapcho; Asya Dorogaeva; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Spatially varying age-period-cohort analysis with application to US mortality, 2002-2016.

Authors:  Pavel Chernyavskiy; Mark P Little; Philip S Rosenberg
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  The effect of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines on otitis media from 2005 to 2013 in children aged ≤5 years: a retrospective cohort study in two Swedish regions.

Authors:  Mark Edmondson-Jones; Therese Dibbern; Marcus Hultberg; Bengt Anell; Emma Medin; Yang Feng; Carla Talarico
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.452

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.