| Literature DB >> 28979565 |
J J McNamee1,2, M A Gillies3,4, N A Barrett5,6, A M Agus7, R Beale5,6, A Bentley8,9, A Bodenham10, S J Brett11, D Brodie12, S J Finney13, A J Gordon14, M Griffiths15,16, D Harrison17, C Jackson7, C McDowell7, C McNally7, G D Perkins18,19, W Tunnicliffe20, A Vuylsteke21, T S Walsh22, M P Wise23, D Young24, D F McAuley1,2.
Abstract
One of the few interventions to demonstrate improved outcomes for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure is reducing tidal volumes when using mechanical ventilation, often termed lung protective ventilation. Veno-venous extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (vv-ECCO2R) can facilitate reducing tidal volumes. pRotective vEntilation with veno-venouS lung assisT (REST) is a randomised, allocation concealed, controlled, open, multicentre pragmatic trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation facilitated by vv-ECCO2R in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. Patients requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation for acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure will be randomly allocated to receive either vv-ECCO2R and lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation or standard care with stratification by recruitment centre. There is a need for a large randomised controlled trial to establish whether vv-ECCO2R in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure can allow the use of a more protective lung ventilation strategy and is associated with improved patient outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: ARDS; Extracorporeal; carbon dioxide; lung protection; respiratory failure; ventilator induced lung injury
Year: 2016 PMID: 28979565 PMCID: PMC5606416 DOI: 10.1177/1751143716681035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Intensive Care Soc ISSN: 1751-1437