Literature DB >> 28979562

Critical care delayed discharge: Good or bad?

Stephen Gilligan1.   

Abstract

NHS England is to introduce a new Commissioning for Quality and Innovation to reduce delayed discharges from adult critical care to ward-level care. A delayed discharge is greater than 4 h, this occurred in 64.2% of patients in the critical care minimum data set database from Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre from the last five years; 46.3% were delayed between 4 and 24 h and 17.9% were delayed more than 24 h. For those who had a delay in their discharge of greater than 24 h, the data suggests that "sicker" patients ultimately do better, since there was a reduction in expected mortality of 5892 patients to an actual mortality of 5201 patients over the five years. More in depth analysis of this data is necessary to try to identify which patients are more likely to benefit from extending their critical care stay once the need for organ support has abated. The current Commissioning for Quality and Innovation offers a slightly perverse incentive against this cohort of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Discharge planning; Hospital mortality; Length of stay

Year:  2016        PMID: 28979562      PMCID: PMC5606414          DOI: 10.1177/1751143716678637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  1 in total

1.  Optimal timing of transfer out of the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Allan Garland; Alfred F Connors
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.228

  1 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  How does the implementation of a patient pathway-based intervention in the acute care of blunt thoracic injury impact on patient outcomes? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Edward Baker; Alison Woolley; Andreas Xyrichis; Christine Norton; Philip Hopkins; Geraldine Lee
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.586

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.