A H Ford1, T Clark2, E C Reynolds3, C Ross4, K Shelley5, L Simmonds6, J Benger7, J Soar8, J P Nolan9, M Thomas10. 1. Department of Anaesthetics, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, UK. 2. Peninsula Deanery, Peninsula Postgraduate Medical Education, Plymouth, UK. 3. Severn Deanery, Bristol, UK. 4. Imperial School of Anaesthesia, London Deanery, UK. 5. MedSTAR, SA Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 6. Severn Deanery, Hambrook, Avon, Bristol, UK. 7. University Hospitals Bristol, Professor of Emergency Care, University of the West of England. Emergency Department, Bristol, UK. 8. Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol, UK. 9. Royal United Hospital, Bristol, UK. 10. Department of Anaesthetics, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest is a common presentation to intensive care units. There is evidence that management protocols between hospitals differ and that this variation is mirrored in patient outcomes between institutions, with standardised treatment protocols improving outcomes within individual units. It has been postulated that regionalisation of services may improve outcomes as has been shown in trauma, burns and stroke patients, however a national protocol has not been a focus for research. The objective of our study was to ascertain current management strategies for comatose post cardiac arrest survivors in intensive care in the United Kingdom. METHOD: A telephone survey was carried out to establish the management of comatose post cardiac arrest survivors in UK intensive care units. All 235 UK intensive care units were contacted and 208 responses (89%) were received. RESULTS: A treatment protocol is used in 172 units (82.7%). Emergency cardiology services were available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in 54 (26%) hospitals; most units (123, 55.8%) transfer patients out for urgent coronary angiography. A ventilator care bundle is used in 197 units (94.7%) and 189 units (90.9%) have a policy for temperature management. Target temperature, duration and method of temperature control and rate of rewarming differ between units. Access to neurophysiology investigations was poor with 91 units (43.8%) reporting no availability. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that treatments available vary considerably between different UK institutions with only 28 units (13.5%) able to offer all aspects of care. This suggests the need for 'cardiac arrest care bundles' and regional centres to ensure cardiac arrests survivors have access to appropriate care.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest is a common presentation to intensive care units. There is evidence that management protocols between hospitals differ and that this variation is mirrored in patient outcomes between institutions, with standardised treatment protocols improving outcomes within individual units. It has been postulated that regionalisation of services may improve outcomes as has been shown in trauma, burns and stroke patients, however a national protocol has not been a focus for research. The objective of our study was to ascertain current management strategies for comatose post cardiac arrest survivors in intensive care in the United Kingdom. METHOD: A telephone survey was carried out to establish the management of comatose post cardiac arrest survivors in UK intensive care units. All 235 UK intensive care units were contacted and 208 responses (89%) were received. RESULTS: A treatment protocol is used in 172 units (82.7%). Emergency cardiology services were available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in 54 (26%) hospitals; most units (123, 55.8%) transfer patients out for urgent coronary angiography. A ventilator care bundle is used in 197 units (94.7%) and 189 units (90.9%) have a policy for temperature management. Target temperature, duration and method of temperature control and rate of rewarming differ between units. Access to neurophysiology investigations was poor with 91 units (43.8%) reporting no availability. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that treatments available vary considerably between different UK institutions with only 28 units (13.5%) able to offer all aspects of care. This suggests the need for 'cardiac arrest care bundles' and regional centres to ensure cardiac arrests survivors have access to appropriate care.
Authors: Michael W Donnino; Jon C Rittenberger; David Gaieski; Michael N Cocchi; Brandon Giberson; Mary Ann Peberdy; Benjamin S Abella; Bentley J Bobrow; Clifton Callaway Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Brendan G Carr; Jeremy M Kahn; Raina M Merchant; Andrew A Kramer; Robert W Neumar Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Graham Nichol; Tom P Aufderheide; Brian Eigel; Robert W Neumar; Keith G Lurie; Vincent J Bufalino; Clifton W Callaway; Venugopal Menon; Robert R Bass; Benjamin S Abella; Michael Sayre; Cynthia M Dougherty; Edward M Racht; Monica E Kleinman; Robert E O'Connor; John P Reilly; Eric W Ossmann; Eric Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Daniel P Davis; Roger Fisher; Steven Aguilar; Marcelyn Metz; Ginger Ochs; Lana McCallum-Brown; Prasanthi Ramanujam; Colleen Buono; Gary M Vilke; Theodore C Chan; James V Dunford Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2007-03-07 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Stephen Morris; Rachael M Hunter; Angus I G Ramsay; Ruth Boaden; Christopher McKevitt; Catherine Perry; Nanik Pursani; Anthony G Rudd; Lee H Schwamm; Simon J Turner; Pippa J Tyrrell; Charles D A Wolfe; Naomi J Fulop Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-08-05
Authors: Jerry P Nolan; Robert A Berg; Clifton W Callaway; Laurie J Morrison; Vinay Nadkarni; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Markus B Skrifvars; Jasmeet Soar; Kjetil Sunde; Alain Cariou Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Janet E Bray; Susie Cartledge; Judith Finn; Glenn M Eastwood; Nicole McKenzie; Dion Stub; Lahn Straney; Stephen Bernard Journal: Resusc Plus Date: 2020-05-21