David Garry1, Jim Newton2, Claire Colebourn3. 1. Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK. 2. Department of Cardiology, OUH NHS Trust, Oxford, UK. 3. Department of Critical Care Medicine, OUH NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Systolic impairment is well reported in critically ill patients but diastolic function has been relatively understudied. The objective of this review was to assess tissue Doppler indices of diastolic function in critically ill patients along with any association with mortality. METHODS: A systematic review of articles in English using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Search terms included diastolic function, diastolic dysfunction, diastolic abnormal*, diastolic heart failure, diastolic filling, ventricular relaxation, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, left ventricular filling pressure, cardiac dysfunction, intensive care, critical care, critically ill, critical illness, sepsis and septic shock. Only studies of critically ill adult patients (excluding post-cardiac surgical patients) whose diastolic function was assessed using tissue Doppler imaging were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included, with a total of 1365 patients. All trials were observational. There was a large heterogeneity in patient populations and the methodology of tissue Doppler assessment of diastology resulting in a descriptive analysis. Patient groups included severe sepsis or septic shock (5 studies), septic shock (5 studies), systemic inflammatory response syndrome and shock (1 study), septic shock and acute lung injury (1 study), cancer and septic shock (2 studies), general ICU patients (1 study), combined medical and surgical ICU (2 studies) and sub-arachnoid haemorrhage patients (2 studies). Seventeen studies scored 5/6 on the NOS with the remaining two scoring 4/6. Fourteen studies reported on numbers of patients diagnosed with diastolic dysfunction (500/999, mean 50%, range 20-92%). Three studies found that diastolic dysfunction was an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Current data shows a large range in the incidence of diastolic dysfunction in this patient population and a variable link with mortality. Future research should focus on the definition of normal values for diastolic function in critically ill patients along with the effects of ICU therapies and consensus criteria for its assessment in this patient population.
PURPOSE: Systolic impairment is well reported in critically ill patients but diastolic function has been relatively understudied. The objective of this review was to assess tissue Doppler indices of diastolic function in critically ill patients along with any association with mortality. METHODS: A systematic review of articles in English using Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Search terms included diastolic function, diastolic dysfunction, diastolic abnormal*, diastolic heart failure, diastolic filling, ventricular relaxation, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, left ventricular filling pressure, cardiac dysfunction, intensive care, critical care, critically ill, critical illness, sepsis and septic shock. Only studies of critically ill adultpatients (excluding post-cardiac surgical patients) whose diastolic function was assessed using tissue Doppler imaging were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included, with a total of 1365 patients. All trials were observational. There was a large heterogeneity in patient populations and the methodology of tissue Doppler assessment of diastology resulting in a descriptive analysis. Patient groups included severe sepsis or septic shock (5 studies), septic shock (5 studies), systemic inflammatory response syndrome and shock (1 study), septic shock and acute lung injury (1 study), cancer and septic shock (2 studies), general ICU patients (1 study), combined medical and surgical ICU (2 studies) and sub-arachnoid haemorrhagepatients (2 studies). Seventeen studies scored 5/6 on the NOS with the remaining two scoring 4/6. Fourteen studies reported on numbers of patients diagnosed with diastolic dysfunction (500/999, mean 50%, range 20-92%). Three studies found that diastolic dysfunction was an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Current data shows a large range in the incidence of diastolic dysfunction in this patient population and a variable link with mortality. Future research should focus on the definition of normal values for diastolic function in critically ill patients along with the effects of ICU therapies and consensus criteria for its assessment in this patient population.
Authors: Giora Landesberg; Dan Gilon; Yuval Meroz; Milena Georgieva; Phillip D Levin; Sergey Goodman; Alexander Avidan; Ronen Beeri; Charles Weissman; Allan S Jaffe; Charles L Sprung Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-09-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Giora Landesberg; Allan S Jaffe; Dan Gilon; Phillip D Levin; Sergey Goodman; Abed Abu-Baih; Ronen Beeri; Charles Weissman; Charles L Sprung; Amir Landesberg Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Walter J Paulus; Carsten Tschöpe; John E Sanderson; Cesare Rusconi; Frank A Flachskampf; Frank E Rademakers; Paolo Marino; Otto A Smiseth; Gilles De Keulenaer; Adelino F Leite-Moreira; Attila Borbély; István Edes; Martin Louis Handoko; Stephane Heymans; Natalia Pezzali; Burkert Pieske; Kenneth Dickstein; Alan G Fraser; Dirk L Brutsaert Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-04-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Eric Meaudre; Christophe Jego; Nadia Kenane; Ambroise Montcriol; Henry Boret; Philippe Goutorbe; Gilbert Habib; Bruno Palmier Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Lill Bergenzaun; Hans Ohlin; Petri Gudmundsson; Joachim Düring; Ronnie Willenheimer; Michelle S Chew Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Filipe André Gonzalez; Miguel Ângelo-Dias; Catarina Martins; Rui Gomes; Jacobo Bacariza; Antero Fernandes; Luís Miguel Borrego Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Ursula Kahl; Leah Schirren; Yuanyuan Yu; Susanne Lezius; Marlene Fischer; Maja Menke; Christoph Sinning; Axel Nierhaus; Maren Vens; Christian Zöllner; Stefan Kluge; Matthias S Goepfert; Katharina Roeher Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-07-01