Literature DB >> 28979441

Chest X-ray interpretation in UK intensive care units: A survey 2014.

Rosalba Spiritoso1, Simon Padley1, Suveer Singh2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This survey investigated current practice in intensive care unit radiology reporting using a survey tool. We ascertained physician attitudes regarding best practice.
METHODS: A national survey was sent by email to a sample of intensive care units throughout UK between March and October 2014. The questionnaire determined current practice in reporting chest X-ray in intensive care units. It also identified differences between 'routine' and emergency and out-of-hours service. Further, it investigated how reports were documented and physician preferences for perceived best practice.
RESULTS: Of 146 intensive care units contacted, 55% completed the survey. Of the sample, radiologists were solely responsible for chest X-ray reporting in 43.7%, intensive care unit clinicians in 33.7% and joint reporting in 25% of intensive care units. The reporting clinician on intensive care unit was a consultant in 67% of the centres. Written reports by radiologists were provided in 71.7% of cases. This was only 54.5% when intensive care unit clinicians reported chest X-rays. For all routine and emergency films, written reports by radiologists occurred in 63.1% of responders. Out-of-hours, 54.9% of clinicians described different reporting practice to normal hours. Regarding perceived best practice, 64.8% of clinicians preferred joint daily reporting, whilst 27% preferred a radiologist's formal report. For emergencies, 55.2% of the survey recipients preferred a joint report.
CONCLUSION: Based on this cohort of UK intensive care units, at present, there appears to be a lack of a standardised system for image reporting. There are discrepancies in who reports chest X-rays, written documentation and the timing of reports, more so out-of-hours. Clinicians suggest that joint reporting should be the standard.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest radiograph; X-ray in ICU; image-reporting system in ICUs in UK

Year:  2015        PMID: 28979441      PMCID: PMC5606453          DOI: 10.1177/1751143715580141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  2 in total

1.  Response audit of an Internet survey of health care providers and administrators: implications for determination of response rates.

Authors:  Mark J Dobrow; Margo C Orchard; Brian Golden; Eric Holowaty; Lawrence Paszat; Adalsteinn D Brown; Terrence Sullivan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES).

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.