| Literature DB >> 28979301 |
Mehdi Maham1, Rouhollah Karami-Osboo2.
Abstract
The application of Pd/Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) for the adsorption of sulfathiazole (STZ) from urine samples prior to high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection was studied. Pd/Fe3O4 NPs were synthesized using plant extract. Possible impact parameters in the extraction process such as magnetic adsorbents amount, extraction time, sample pH, and desorption conditions were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, the detection and quantification limits were 10 and 30 ng mL-1, respectively. The relative standard deviation for five measurements of 100 ng mL-1 of STZ was 5.8 %. The proposed method was used for the analysis of different urine samples, and acceptable recoveries in the range of 87.6 - 101.3% were obtained. These results indicated that biosynthesized Pd/Fe3O4 NPs can be used as an efficient adsorbent for extraction of sulfathiazole from urine samples.Entities:
Keywords: Biosynthesis; Extraction; HPLC-UV; Magnetic nanoparticles; Urine
Year: 2017 PMID: 28979301 PMCID: PMC5603855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1Illustration of the procedure for MSPE.
Figure 2A) SEM image of Pd/Fe3O4 NPs. B) TEM image of Pd/Fe3O4 NPs
Figure 3XRD powder pattern of the Pd/Fe3O4 NPs.
Figure 4EDS spectrum of Pd/Fe3O4 NPs.
Figure 5VSM magnetization curve of Pd/Fe3O4 NPs.
Figure 6Effect of Pd/Fe3O4 NPs amount on the extraction efficiency of STZ.
Figure 7Effect of pH on the extraction efficiency of STZ.
Figure 8Effect of extraction time on the extraction efficiency of STZ.
Figure 9Desorption conditions: A) Desorption solvent. B) Desorption time.
Relative recoveries of STZ in urine samplesa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STZ | 1 | NDc | 50.0 | 48.4 ± 2.4 | 96.8 |
| 100.0 | 90.4 ± 4.6 | 90.4 | |||
| 200.0 | 202.6 ± 12.1 | 101.3 | |||
| 2 | ND | 50.0 | 44.9 ± 2.8 | 89.8 | |
| 100.0 | 95.2 ± 5.8 | 95.2 | |||
| 200.0 | 188.6 ± 11.1 | 94.3 | |||
| 3 | ND | 50.0 | 46.15 ± 2.5 | 92.3 | |
| 100.0 | 91.2 ± 6.2 | 91.2 | |||
| 200.0 | 175.2 ± 9.9 | 87.6 |
Extraction conditions: the amount of MNPs: 0.02 g; the extraction time; 10 min; desorption solvent: 4 mL acetonitrile;
SD: Standard deviation (n=3).
ND: not detection
Comparison of MSPE-HPLC-UV with other methods for the extraction and determination STZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFRLM | HPLC–MS/MS | 8.7 | < 20 | (27) |
| LLE-FPVLT | HPLC–MS/MS | 11.28 | >12.9 | (28) |
| SPE | nano-HPLC-MS | 8 | 9 | (29) |
| SLM | HPLC-MS | < 20 | - | (30) |
| MSPE | HPLC-UV | 10 | 5.8 | This work |
HFRLM, hollow fiber renewal liquid membrane
HPLC–MS/MS, high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry LLE-FPVLT, liquid–liquid extraction with fast partition at very low temperature
SPE, solid-phase extraction
SLM, supported liquid membrane.