| Literature DB >> 28978817 |
Abstract
Anti-vibration gloves have been used in real workplaces to reduce vibration transmitted through hand-held power tools to the hand. Generally materials used for vibration attenuation in gloves are resilient materials composed of certain synthetic and/or composite polymers. The mechanical characteristics of the resilient materials used in anti-vibration gloves are prone to be influenced by environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, and photo-irradiation, which cause material degradation and aging. This study focused on the influence of shelf aging on the vibration attenuation performance of air-packaged anti-vibration gloves following 2 yr of shelf aging. Effects of shelf aging on the vibration attenuation performance of anti-vibration gloves were examined according to the Japan industrial standard JIS T8114 test protocol. The findings indicate that shelf aging induces the reduction of vibration attenuation performance in air-packaged anti-vibration gloves.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-vibration glove; Degradation; JIS T8114; Shelf aging; Vibration transmissibility
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28978817 PMCID: PMC5718778 DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2017-0148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ind Health ISSN: 0019-8366 Impact factor: 2.179
Anti-vibration glove samples prepared in this study
| Glove 1 | Glove 2 | Glove 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vibration attenuation material | Gel foam | Chloroprene rubber | Synthetic rubber with bamboo charcoal fibers embedded | |
| Outer surface material | Nitrile rubber | Nitrile rubber | Cow skin | |
| JIS T 8114 test requirement | TRM | OK | OK | OK |
| TRH | OK* | OK | OK | |
*According to the manufacturer’s statement, Glove1 is satisfied with the vibration transmissibility requirement specified in JIS T8114. However the measurement result in this study did not support the statement.
Change in the vibration transmissibility (TR) values of three anti-vibration glove samples up to 2 yr of shelf aging in air
| TRM | TRH | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1 yr of shelf aging | 2 yr of shelf aging | Control | 1 yr of shelf aging | 2 yr of shelf aging | |||
| Glove1 | Av. | 0.916 | 1.087* | 1.034* | 0.744 | 0.773* | 0.816* | |
| SD | 0.023 | 0.0044 | 0.015 | 0.031 | 0.013 | 0.0095 | ||
| Glove 2 | Av. | 0.850 | 0.890* | 0.892* | 0.504 | 0.531* | 0.585* | |
| SD | 0.073 | 0.0030 | 0.024 | 0.047 | 0.016 | 0.014 | ||
| Glove 3 | Av. | 0.867 | 0.863 | 0.885* | 0.460 | 0.475* | 0.545* | |
| SD | 0.0021 | 0.059 | 0.034 | 0.0035 | 0.035 | 0.050 | ||
*p<0.05
TR values in gray cells shows that the TR values were not satisfied with the vibration transmissibility requirements specified in JIS T8114.
Percentage reduction in the vibration transmissibility (TR) values of three anti-vibration glove samples up to 2 yr of shelf aging in air
| Percentage change in TR values (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRM | TRH | ||||
| 1 yr of shelf aging | 2 yr of shelf aging | 1 yr of helf aging | 2 yr of helf aging | ||
| Glove 1 | 18.8 | 13.0 | 3.87 | 9.63 | |
| Glove 2 | 4.74 | 4.99 | 5.28 | 16.1 | |
| Glove 3 | −0.40 | 2.15 | 3.44 | 18.6 | |
Percentage change of TR values in gray cells shows that the TR values have fallen to more than 10% below the initial TR values.