Literature DB >> 28978699

Induction of DNA Damages upon Marek's Disease Virus Infection: Implication in Viral Replication and Pathogenesis.

Djihad Bencherit1, Sylvie Remy1, Yves Le Vern2, Tereza Vychodil3, Luca D Bertzbach3, Benedikt B Kaufer3, Caroline Denesvre1, Laëtitia Trapp-Fragnet4.   

Abstract

Marek's disease virus (MDV) is a highly contagious alphaherpesvirus that infects chickens and causes a deadly neoplastic disease. We previously demonstrated that MDV infection arrests cells in S phase and that the tegument protein VP22 plays a major role in this process. In addition, expression of VP22 induces double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the cellular DNA, suggesting that DNA damage and the associated cellular response might be favorable for the MDV life cycle. Here, we addressed the role of DNA damage in MDV replication and pathogenesis. We demonstrated that MDV induces DSBs during lytic infection in vitro and in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of infected animals. Intriguingly, we did not observe DNA damage in latently infected MDV-induced lymphoblastoid cells, while MDV reactivation resulted in the onset of DNA lesions, suggesting that DNA damage and/or the resulting DNA damage response might be required for efficient MDV replication and reactivation. In addition, reactivation was significantly enhanced by the induction of DNA damage using a number of chemicals. Finally, we used recombinant viruses to show that VP22 is required for the induction of DNA damage in vivo and that this likely contributes to viral oncogenesis.IMPORTANCE Marek's disease virus is an oncogenic alphaherpesvirus that causes fatal T-cell lymphomas in chickens. MDV causes substantial losses in the poultry industry and is also used in small-animal models for virus-induced tumor formation. DNA damage not only is implicated in tumor development but also aids in the life cycle of several viruses; however, its role in MDV replication, latency, and reactivation remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate that MDV induces DNA lesions during lytic replication in vitro and in vivo DNA damage was not observed in latently infected cells; however, it was reinitiated during reactivation. Reactivation was significantly enhanced by the induction of DNA damage. Recombinant viruses that lacked the ability to induce DNA damage were defective in their ability to induce tumors, suggesting that DNA damage might also contribute to cellular transformation processes leading to MDV lymphomagenesis.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; Marek's disease virus; VP22; cell cycle; herpesvirus; oncogenesis; viral replication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28978699      PMCID: PMC5709610          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01658-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  73 in total

1.  Characterization of reticuloendotheliosis virus-transformed avian T-lymphoblastoid cell lines infected with Marek's disease virus.

Authors:  W D Pratt; R W Morgan; K A Schat
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Fluorescently tagged pUL47 of Marek's disease virus reveals differential tissue expression of the tegument protein in vivo.

Authors:  Keith W Jarosinski; Sina Arndt; Benedikt B Kaufer; Nikolaus Osterrieder
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  ATM activation in the presence of oxidative stress.

Authors:  Zhi Guo; Rajashree Deshpande; Tanya T Paull
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Inhibitory effects of nitric oxide and gamma interferon on in vitro and in vivo replication of Marek's disease virus.

Authors:  Z Xing; K A Schat
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Conserved gammaherpesvirus kinase and histone variant H2AX facilitate gammaherpesvirus latency in vivo.

Authors:  Vera L Tarakanova; Eleni Stanitsa; Steven M Leonardo; Tarin M Bigley; Stephen B Gauld
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Influence of nitric oxide on the generation and repair of oxidative DNA damage in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Nicole Phoa; Bernd Epe
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Three Epstein-Barr virus latency proteins independently promote genomic instability by inducing DNA damage, inhibiting DNA repair and inactivating cell cycle checkpoints.

Authors:  B Gruhne; R Sompallae; M G Masucci
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  HSV-I and the cellular DNA damage response.

Authors:  Samantha Smith; Sandra K Weller
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.831

9.  A virus-encoded telomerase RNA promotes malignant T cell lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  Sascha Trapp; Mark S Parcells; Jeremy P Kamil; Daniel Schumacher; B Karsten Tischer; Pankaj M Kumar; Venugopal K Nair; Nikolaus Osterrieder
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Activation of DNA Damage Response Pathways during Lytic Replication of KSHV.

Authors:  Robert Hollingworth; George L Skalka; Grant S Stewart; Andrew D Hislop; David J Blackbourn; Roger J Grand
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.048

View more
  5 in total

1.  TOP2β-Dependent Nuclear DNA Damage Shapes Extracellular Growth Factor Responses via Dynamic AKT Phosphorylation to Control Virus Latency.

Authors:  Hui-Lan Hu; Lora A Shiflett; Mariko Kobayashi; Moses V Chao; Angus C Wilson; Ian Mohr; Tony T Huang
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Marek's Disease Virus Disables the ATR-Chk1 Pathway by Activating STAT3.

Authors:  Xue Lian; Chenyi Bao; Xueqi Li; Xunhai Zhang; Hongjun Chen; Yong-Sam Jung; Yingjuan Qian
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Hypoxia and HIF-1 Trigger Marek's Disease Virus Reactivation in Lymphoma-Derived Latently Infected T Lymphocytes.

Authors:  Corentin Mallet; Jade Cochard; Sébastien Leclercq; Laetitia Trapp-Fragnet; Philippe Chouteau; Caroline Denesvre
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 6.549

4.  The sulphated polysaccharides extract ulvans from Ulva armoricana limits Marek's disease virus dissemination in vitro and promotes viral reactivation in lymphoid cells.

Authors:  Frédérick Bussy; Sylvie Rémy; Matthieu Le Goff; Pi Nyvall Collén; Laëtitia Trapp-Fragnet
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  A Cell Culture System to Investigate Marek's Disease Virus Integration into Host Chromosomes.

Authors:  Yu You; Tereza Vychodil; Giulia Aimola; Renato L Previdelli; Thomas W Göbel; Luca D Bertzbach; Benedikt B Kaufer
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.