James E Voss1, Raiees Andrabi1, Laura E McCoy2, Natalia de Val3, Roberta P Fuller1, Terrence Messmer1, Ching-Yao Su1, Devin Sok1, Salar N Khan4, Fernando Garces3, Laura K Pritchard5, Richard T Wyatt1, Andrew B Ward3, Max Crispin6, Ian A Wilson7, Dennis R Burton8. 1. Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Scripps Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology & Immunogen Discovery, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. 2. Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Scripps Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology & Immunogen Discovery, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Division of Infection and Immunity, Faculty of Medical Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. 3. Scripps Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology & Immunogen Discovery, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. 4. Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. 5. Oxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK. 6. Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Oxford Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK. 7. Scripps Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology & Immunogen Discovery, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. 8. Department of Immunology and Microbiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Scripps Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology & Immunogen Discovery, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; International AIDS Vaccine Initiative Neutralizing Antibody Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: burton@scripps.edu.
Abstract
Recent efforts toward HIV vaccine development include the design of immunogens that can engage B cell receptors with the potential to affinity mature into broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs). V2-apex bnAbs, which bind a protein-glycan region on HIV envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimer, are among the most broad and potent described. We show here that a rare "glycan hole" at the V2 apex is enriched in HIV isolates neutralized by inferred precursors of prototype V2-apex bnAbs. To investigate whether this feature could focus neutralizing responses onto the apex bnAb region, we immunized wild-type rabbits with soluble trimers adapted from these Envs. Potent autologous tier 2 neutralizing responses targeting basic residues in strand C of the V2 region, which forms the core epitope for V2-apex bnAbs, were observed. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) derived from these animals display features promising for subsequent broadening of the response.
Recent efforts toward HIV vaccine development include the design of immunogens that can engage B cell receptors with the potential to affinity mature into broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs). V2-apexbnAbs, which bind a protein-glycan region on HIV envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimer, are among the most broad and potent described. We show here that a rare "glycan hole" at the V2 apex is enriched in HIV isolates neutralized by inferred precursors of prototype V2-apexbnAbs. To investigate whether this feature could focus neutralizing responses onto the apexbnAb region, we immunized wild-type rabbits with soluble trimers adapted from these Envs. Potent autologous tier 2 neutralizing responses targeting basic residues in strand C of the V2 region, which forms the core epitope for V2-apexbnAbs, were observed. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) derived from these animals display features promising for subsequent broadening of the response.
Neutralizing antibodies to HIV can protect against immunodeficiency viruses in animal models (Moldt et al., 2012, Pegu et al., 2014, Shingai et al., 2014), and their induction is seen as important for the generation of a successful HIV vaccine (Burton and Hangartner, 2016, Haynes and Mascola, 2017). The HIV envelope glycoprotein (Env) controls virus entry into target cells and is the sole target for neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) that block this process. Env is a membrane-anchored trimer of heterodimers (gp120-gp41)3 that conceals much of its surface from antibody recognition using a shield of N-linked glycans (Behrens et al., 2016, Bonomelli et al., 2011, Lee et al., 2016, Stewart-Jones et al., 2016, Ward and Wilson, 2017). The antibody-accessible protein surfaces are highly variable in sequence and dynamic due to shifting N-linked glycan sequons, resulting in neutralizing responses that are mostly isolate specific (Moore et al., 2012, Sok et al., 2014). Despite these viral evasion strategies, broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) can emerge after years of affinity maturation during natural HIV infection in some individuals. These bnAbs, their affinity maturation from naive precursors, and their binding to HIV Env are being intensively studied in the hope that the information gathered can be used to design immunogens to elicit bnAbs, a process that has been termed “reverse vaccinology 2.0” (Burton, 2002, Burton, 2017, Rappuoli et al., 2016).Several epitope regions on Env have been identified as targets for bnAbs (McCoy and Burton, 2017, Ward and Wilson, 2017, West et al., 2014). One such region is the trimer apex, comprising overlapping quaternary epitopes formed by the variable loop (V2) and N160glycan from all three gp120 protomers (V2 apex) (Julien et al., 2013, McLellan et al., 2011, Pancera et al., 2013, Walker et al., 2009). In studies involving large cohorts of infected donors, bnAbs directed to the V2 apex emerge relatively frequently (21%–42% of all bnAbs) and early in infection, making the V2 apex region an attractive target for immunogen design (Georgiev et al., 2013, Landais et al., 2016, Walker et al., 2010). There are currently four prototype V2-apexbnAbs, and each was derived from different HIV-infected donors (PG9, CH01, PGT145, and CAP256.09) (Bonsignori et al., 2011, Doria-Rose et al., 2014, Walker et al., 2009, Walker et al., 2011). All four prototypes bind to a core epitope involving a lysine-rich β strand “C” (basic patch) in the V2 domain (HXB2 168–171) and N-linked glycans, particularly at residue 160 (N160) and, to a somewhat lesser extent, residue 156 (N156) (Andrabi et al., 2015, Gorman et al., 2016, McLellan et al., 2011, Pancera et al., 2013). The structural feature that allows antibody penetration through the glycan shield to contact the V2 basic patch is an unusually long heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (CDRH3) loop, which for PG9 and CAP256.09 makes contact with strand-C lysines through a conserved germline-encoded tripeptide YYD motif originating from the same D-gene (Andrabi et al., 2015, McLellan et al., 2011, Pancera et al., 2013).We and others have previously described viruses that are neutralized by inferred precursors (iPs) of prototype apexbnAbs (Andrabi et al., 2015, Gorman et al., 2016). It is logical that the Env immunogens derived from these viruses might effectively expand V2-apexbnAb precursor lineages in humans. We showed that one of these Env sequences could be adapted to produce recombinant soluble near-native SOSIP.664 trimers (referred to hereafter as SOSIPs). Here, we describe the identification of a larger panel of four SOSIPs derived from V2-apexbnAb iP-sensitive viruses, which have antibody-binding profiles representative of functional Env spikes. Sequence analysis revealed that three of these Envs lack predicted N-linked glycosylation (PNG) sites at position 130 (HXB2 numbering) and within the V2 hypervariable region (designated the V2′, HXB2 position 183–191) that constitute a rare “glycan hole” at the V2 apex, as has been described at other Env locations (Crooks et al., 2015, Klasse et al., 2016, McCoy et al., 2016). Incorporation of PNG sites to fill this hole disrupted neutralization by iP antibodies, suggesting this glycan hole may aid the elicitation of bnAbs to this general region.To assess the ability of our immunogens to focus responses to the V2 apex region, we immunized rabbits using all four V2-apexbnAb iP-binding SOSIPs given individually, as a mixture, or sequentially. Marked differences were found among the trimers in their ability to elicit autologous nAbs. The dominant target of these responses was the same glycan hole at the V2 apex that was required for neutralization by the iP versions of prototype V2-apexbnAbs. One trimer immunogen consistently elicited responses involving strand-C basic patch residues, which are also key contacts for prototype bnAbs. Therefore, it appears that this hole in the glycan shield may indeed improve exposure of the V2-apexbnAb region to neutralizing responses. Encouragingly, we also report the elicitation of neutralizing responses targeting several heterologous tier 2 viruses in one animal that was immunized with a SOSIP trimer cocktail.
Results
Glycan Holes Are a Major Determinant for V2-Apex bnAb iP Binding on Select Env-Based Trimers
HIV isolates screened for sensitivity to neutralization by iP versions of PG9, CH01, and PGT145 antibodies (Andrabi et al., 2015, Gorman et al., 2016) and the CAP256 unmutated common ancestor sequence (UCA) (Doria-Rose et al., 2014) are shown in Figure 1A. We compared Env sequences from eight iP-sensitive isolates to identify critical features that might facilitate neutralization. Strikingly, four of these Envs lacked PNG sites at locations in close proximity to key bnAb contacts, the strand-C lysines, suggesting the presence of a glycan hole at the V2 apex. These Envs are derived from C108.c03 (hereafter referred to as C108, clade AE), CRF-T250 (hereafter CRF250, clade AG), WITO4160.33 (hereafter WITO, clade B), and Q23.env17 (clade A), all neutralized by both PG9 and CH01 iP antibodies (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Sensitivity of Select Envs to iP Versions of V2-Apex Prototype bnAbs
(A) Env iP neutralization table. HIV isolates neutralized by three prototype V2-apex bnAb iP Abs and the CAP256 UCA. Neutralization IC50 values against each pseudovirus are in micrograms per milliliter. Envelope features, including the strand-C lysine-rich basic patch sequence and V1 V2 regions, are also noted. The presence of PNG sites at specific sequences are marked by a plus (+) sign (two glycans are ++) and the total number of PNG sites in the V1V2 loop are given. NXT/S sequons are indicated by a bold red N in sequence alignments. Envs that were successfully generated as soluble native trimers are in blue font.
(B) Trimer V2-apex model. The BG505 trimer (PDB: 5T3X) highlighting residue 130 (blue spheres) and the base of the V2′ hypervariable region loop. Sequence variation in this region between select Envs is shown in the insert on the right. Residues between the last structured amino acids in the V2′ region loop (185 and 187; HXB2) are highlighted in yellow with NXS/T sequons underlined. 130 and V2′ sites lie close to each other and to the V2-apex bnAb core epitope, including the strand-C basic residues N156 and N160 (pink).
(C) iP antibody neutralization of V2-apex glycan variants. Shown are neutralization IC50 values (in micrograms per milliliter) for mature or iP PG9 and CH01 antibodies against virus variants with V2-apex PNG sites at 130 or within the V2′ region either added or removed.
(D) Biolayer interferometry (BLI) showing the binding and dissociation curves for PG9 and CH01 iPs and for CAP256 UCA to PGT145-purified SOSIPs. Binding was measured by incubation with the indicated concentrations of SOSIP (180–300 s) measured in delta (nanometers) or response units. Dissociation of SOSIP from the IgG in PBS buffer was further recorded.
Sensitivity of Select Envs to iP Versions of V2-Apex Prototype bnAbs(A) Env iP neutralization table. HIV isolates neutralized by three prototype V2-apexbnAb iP Abs and the CAP256UCA. Neutralization IC50 values against each pseudovirus are in micrograms per milliliter. Envelope features, including the strand-C lysine-rich basic patch sequence and V1 V2 regions, are also noted. The presence of PNG sites at specific sequences are marked by a plus (+) sign (two glycans are ++) and the total number of PNG sites in the V1V2 loop are given. NXT/S sequons are indicated by a bold red N in sequence alignments. Envs that were successfully generated as soluble native trimers are in blue font.(B) Trimer V2-apex model. The BG505 trimer (PDB: 5T3X) highlighting residue 130 (blue spheres) and the base of the V2′ hypervariable region loop. Sequence variation in this region between select Envs is shown in the insert on the right. Residues between the last structured amino acids in the V2′ region loop (185 and 187; HXB2) are highlighted in yellow with NXS/T sequons underlined. 130 and V2′ sites lie close to each other and to the V2-apexbnAb core epitope, including the strand-C basic residues N156 and N160 (pink).(C) iP antibody neutralization of V2-apexglycan variants. Shown are neutralization IC50 values (in micrograms per milliliter) for mature or iP PG9 and CH01 antibodies against virus variants with V2-apexPNG sites at 130 or within the V2′ region either added or removed.(D) Biolayer interferometry (BLI) showing the binding and dissociation curves for PG9 and CH01iPs and for CAP256UCA to PGT145-purified SOSIPs. Binding was measured by incubation with the indicated concentrations of SOSIP (180–300 s) measured in delta (nanometers) or response units. Dissociation of SOSIP from the IgG in PBS buffer was further recorded.The V2-apexglycan hole is modeled onto the BG505SOSIP structure (Gristick et al., 2016), in Figure 1B to reveal absent PNG sites at position 130 (HXB2 numbering) and within a loop projecting apically from the V2 hypervariable region designated V2′ (HXB2 183–191). This loop is unstructured in the BG505 model (HXB2 185–187). The glycan at 130 (N130) is conserved in 56% of viruses from a 120-virus panel (Seaman et al., 2010) representing the global diversity of HIV. However, at least one PNG site is highly conserved in the V2′ loop (94% of viruses in the panel), so that viruses lacking glycans at both sites represent only ∼4% of these isolates. To directly investigate the role of these glycans on V2-apex iP antibody binding, we incorporated PNG sites at N130 and/or within the V2′ region in three of these Envs and assessed their neutralizing sensitivity to the iPs. PNG sites added to at least one of these two positions either reduced or eliminated neutralizing activity of the iPs, with the effect being more prominent for N130 (Figure 1C). For BG505 (already lacking a PNG site at 130), the removal of two PNG sites within the V2′ region rendered this virus sensitive to neutralization by the CH01 iP (Figure 1C). HIV-001428, the only other virus from the 120-virus global panel lacking glycans at both these positions, was not neutralized by any iP (Figure 1A), suggesting that the absence of glycans at both 130 and within the V2′ is not sufficient for iP reactivity in some Env contexts. HIV-001428 has an especially long V2′ region (Figure 1B). This may obstruct iP access to important strand-C contacts. iP antibodies can tolerate glycans at either or both of these positions in some Env sequence contexts, such as MGRM8, MGRM14, ZM233, and 16055 (Figure 1A). V1 or V2 lengths did not correlate with iP sensitivities (Figure 1A).To investigate whether the iP-sensitive Envs could be used as immunogens to guide a V2-apex-specific neutralizing response, we first incorporated SOSIP.664-trimer-stabilizing modifications as previously described (Pugach et al., 2015, Sanders et al., 2013). Four of these Envs (CRF250, C108, WITO, and MGRM-002-8 [hereafter MGRM8]) (Figure S1A) produced soluble trimer when purified by PGT145 antibody (Ab) affinity chromatography. PGT145 enriches only native-like homogeneous trimer populations that are properly folded (Pugach et al., 2015). All SOSIP trimers eluted as single peaks with sizes consistent with the trimeric form by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) (Figure S1B).Next, we assessed the binding of the PG9, CH01iPs, and CAP256UCA Abs to the soluble SOSIP trimers by biolayer interferometry (BLI). Consistent with the neutralization data, the iP Abs displayed significant binding to the soluble trimers (Figure 1D). Among the four SOSIPs, only the CRF250 trimer showed binding to all three iP Abs. The virus encoding this Env shares V2-apex sequence similarity with CAP256 superinfecting virus (CAP256.SU), a descendant of which likely triggered the CAP256 V2-apexbnAb lineage (Bhiman et al., 2015, Doria-Rose et al., 2014). CRF250 also has a pattern of neutralization sensitivity similar to CAP256.SU by the CAP256bnAbs. While WITO was neutralized by both PG9 and CH01iPs, binding of its SOSIP could only be detected for CH01, possibly reflecting subtle differences between the Env as a membrane-associated functional trimer on the viral surface and the PGT145-enriched SOSIP-stabilized recombinant trimers. In all, we demonstrate that a glycan hole at the V2 apex is associated with binding to iP versions of V2-apexbnAbs in three of four vulnerable HIV-1 isolates that could be successfully produced as soluble trimers. These trimers showed iP-binding properties mostly consistent with iP neutralization data.
The V2-Apex iP-Binding SOSIPs Form Homogeneously Folded Trimers and Display Native-like Properties
Next, we characterized the SOSIP trimers that bound V2-apexiPs, biophysically and antigenically, to determine their suitability as immunogens. PGT145-purified SOSIPs formed well-ordered, 3-fold symmetric trimers by negative-stain electron microscopy (EM) (Figure 2A), which were efficiently cleaved into gp120 and gp41 as assessed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (Figure S1B). Enzymatically released and fluorescently labeled N-glycans were analyzed by hydrophilic interaction ultraperformance liquid chromatography (HILIC-UPLC) (Behrens et al., 2016, Pritchard et al., 2015) to determine the glycan composition for each trimer. The profiles were comparable to BG505SOSIP expressed in 293T cells, with a large proportion of high-mannoseglycansMan8–9GlcNAc2 (Man8–9) and a smaller fraction of mannose Man5–7GlcNAc2 (Man5–7) and complex glycans (Figure 2B).
Figure 2
Biophysical and Antigenic Properties of iP-Binding Soluble Trimers
(A) Negative-stain EM. Class average, negative-stain EM images of CRF250, C108, WITO, and MGRM8 native trimers in descending order.
(B) SOSIP glycan composition. Elution time of enzymatically released N-glycans from SOSIP immunogens in HILIC-UPLC. Area of eluted peaks represents the quantity of a particular glycoform (indicated above the peak). Pie diagrams indicate glycoform ratios for each of the immunogens.
(C) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showing the thermal stability of the SOSIP immunogens and their sequence-matched gp120s. Protein denaturation is measured in kilocal/mol/°C. Melting peak temperature (Tm) is indicated above the peak.
(D) mAb binding to SOSIPs. Maximal binding in response units (RUs) of 500 nM CRF250 (red), C108 (blue), WITO (orange), and MGRM8 (purple) SOSIPs (colored circles) as well as their sequence-matched gp120s (black circles) to a panel of 85 mAbs measured by BLI. The Abs are divided by epitope as indicated on the far left y axis. RU values are given in Figure S1C.
(E) Neutralization activities. Pseudovirus neutralization IC50 values plotted against SOSIP-binding response units show a strong correlation (two-tailed Spearman R).
Biophysical and Antigenic Properties of iP-Binding Soluble Trimers(A) Negative-stain EM. Class average, negative-stain EM images of CRF250, C108, WITO, and MGRM8 native trimers in descending order.(B) SOSIPglycan composition. Elution time of enzymatically released N-glycans from SOSIP immunogens in HILIC-UPLC. Area of eluted peaks represents the quantity of a particular glycoform (indicated above the peak). Pie diagrams indicate glycoform ratios for each of the immunogens.(C) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showing the thermal stability of the SOSIP immunogens and their sequence-matched gp120s. Protein denaturation is measured in kilocal/mol/°C. Melting peak temperature (Tm) is indicated above the peak.(D) mAb binding to SOSIPs. Maximal binding in response units (RUs) of 500 nM CRF250 (red), C108 (blue), WITO (orange), and MGRM8 (purple) SOSIPs (colored circles) as well as their sequence-matched gp120s (black circles) to a panel of 85 mAbs measured by BLI. The Abs are divided by epitope as indicated on the far left y axis. RU values are given in Figure S1C.(E) Neutralization activities. Pseudovirus neutralization IC50 values plotted against SOSIP-binding response units show a strong correlation (two-tailed Spearman R).Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to assess the thermal stability of the trimers and showed single unfolding peaks for CRF250, C108, and MGRM8 trimers with thermal denaturation midpoints (Tm) of 68.1°, 70.8°, and 65.1°, respectively. These thermostabilities are similar to that of BG505SOSIP, which has a Tm of 68.1°C (Sanders et al., 2013). The WITO SOSIP trimer showed two melting peaks (Tm) at 57.7° and 66.9°, indicating the presence of an uncharacterized heterogeneous mixture of trimer populations (Figure 2C).To evaluate the overall antigenic profile of the SOSIP trimers generated here, we used BLI to characterize the binding of trimers and their sequence-matched gp120 proteins to a panel of 85 Env-specific neutralizing and non-neutralizing Abs directed to a range of epitopes. These include antibodies targeting the V2 apex (n = 30), V3-glycan (n = 16), CD4-binding site (CD4bs) (n = 14), gp120-gp41 interface (n = 10), non-neutralizing V3 (n = 11), and CD4-induced (CD4i) (n = 3) and gp41 cluster-1 (n = 1) (Figures 2D and S1C). The trimers generally displayed strong reactivity with bnAbs. All four trimers showed robust binding to the V2-apex-directed and gp120-gp41 interface bnAb epitopes. Weak or no antibody binding to the corresponding sequence-matched gp120s was observed, consistent with the trimer-specific/preferring nature of bnAbs to these sites. V3-glycanbnAbs were also trimer preferring, with the exception of reactivity with MGRM8 Env, where they bound to trimer and gp120 equally. The trimer preference of V3-glycanbnAb PGT121 lineage intermediates has been described previously (Sok et al., 2013). CD4-binding-site bnAbs did not show a preference for trimers, and CRF250 showed unusually low antibody binding to this site. We included four non-neutralizing V2-apex-directed Abs (2909, C108G, 830A, and 697) to examine whether the glycan hole exposed non-neutralizing V2 epitopes. Only WITO and MGRM8 SOSIP trimers weakly bound 830A (Figure S1C). Non-neutralizing V3 reactivity was seen with all trimers. WITO showed V3 reactivity similar to that observed for its gp120 monomer. CRF250 and MGRM8 trimers showed reduced V3 reactivities compared with their respective gp120s. C108 trimer showed the lowest reactivity, with only three V3-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) showing binding over 0.2 response units (RUs) (Figure 2D). However, binding to C108gp120 was also lower than for other strains. Trimer V3 reactivities are consistent with some unfolding or breathing and exposure of V3 in a fraction of SOSIP molecules, as described for other HIV strains (Sanders et al., 2013). Additionally, the MGRM8 trimer showed reactivity with two CD4i mAbs, suggesting that it may be somewhat prone to partial unfolding or opening to the CD4-bound form (Figure 2D). We further tested the ability of these mAbs to neutralize viruses pseudotyped with Envs corresponding to the four SOSIP timers and observed a strong correlation between binding and neutralizing activity (Figure 2E). These data suggest that the four recombinant immunogens are in conformations representative of their native functional states on viral surfaces.
Immunization of Rabbits with V2-Apex iP-bnAb-Binding Soluble Trimers Elicits Autologous Neutralizing Responses to Varying Extents
To evaluate the immunogenicity of the iP-binding trimers and determine whether they could guide a V2-apex-focused neutralizing response, we chose New Zealand white rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) as an animal model. This is because rabbits have previously induced well-characterized high-titer tier 2 neutralization in response to other SOSIP immunogens (Klasse et al., 2016, Sanders et al., 2015). Further, rabbit and human repertoires share similar CDRH3 length frequencies and amino acid compositions (Lavinder et al., 2014), and this region is thought to be critical for V2-apexbnAb function.Groups of four, 3-month-old, female rabbits were immunized with the individual SOSIP trimers, a cocktail of all four trimers, or with each trimer sequentially as depicted in Figure 3A. Each immunization contained 50 μg trimer given with 100 U Iscomatrix adjuvant injected intra-muscularly (IM). Animals were immunized at 0, 4, and 12 weeks. A final boost, unique to each group, was administered at 24 weeks post-prime. For this final boost, groups immunized with individual SOSIP trimers were given a cocktail of the three other heterologous trimers used in the study (total protein in the cocktail remained at 50 μg/dose); the cocktail-immunized group received a final injection of all four SOSIPs, and the sequentially immunized group received its final SOSIP trimer (Figure 3A). The sequential immunization protocol relied on the conserved gp41 sequence to provide adequate helper T cell epitopes, and SOSIP-binding titers from this group show prime-boost responses, suggesting that adequate T cell help was available for B cells responding to the variant immunogens (Figure S2A). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and sera were collected at the time points indicated in Figure 3A. Neutralization against the autologous virus was first assessed using rabbit immune sera (Figure S2B), but to allow quantification of the response (in micrograms per milliliter) of immunoglobulin G (IgG), all analyses were subsequently carried out using polyclonal-protein-A/G-purified IgG from serum.
Figure 3
Rabbit Trimer Immunizations and Elicited Neutralizing Responses
(A) Immunization schedule. Six groups of 4 female New Zealand white rabbits were immunized with mixtures or individual SOSIPs as indicated by the colored circles. 50 μg total protein and 100 U Iscomatrix were given intramuscularly (IM) at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months. Serum or plasma was collected at times indicated by red arrows.
(B) Autologous and tier 1 neutralization responses in immunized rabbits. Serum IgG from rabbit pre-bleeds or at 14 days post-immunization (B1, B2, B3C, and B4C) was assessed for neutralizing ability against the sequence-matched pseudovirus for the SOSIP immunogens used in this study (colored boxes) or tier 1 pseudoviruses (gray boxes) on the left side of the table. Data are arranged by immunization group from left to right, and the immunogen most recently given for the time point in each group is indicated across the top of the table by a colored circle. Pseudovirus neutralization by rabbit immune serum IgG is given as the IC50 (in micrograms per milliliter) of IgG purified from rabbit serum. Samples are indicated by rabbit identification numbers to the left of IC50 values. Higher neutralizing responses are colored.
(C) Neutralization of heterologous viruses by SOSIP mixture immunized rabbit, P5672. Virus neutralization as a function of rabbit immune serum IgG concentration is shown for five tier 2 clade AE viruses (92TH is an unconfirmed tier 2 virus), neutralized by the cocktail immunized rabbit P5672. The average percent neutralization and SDs from triplicate experiments are given. Orange, blue, and red curves show neutralization of these same viruses after absorption of the P5672 IgG with WITO (orange), C108 (blue), or CRF250 SOSIPs, respectively.
Rabbit Trimer Immunizations and Elicited Neutralizing Responses(A) Immunization schedule. Six groups of 4 female New Zealand white rabbits were immunized with mixtures or individual SOSIPs as indicated by the colored circles. 50 μg total protein and 100 U Iscomatrix were given intramuscularly (IM) at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months. Serum or plasma was collected at times indicated by red arrows.(B) Autologous and tier 1 neutralization responses in immunized rabbits. Serum IgG from rabbit pre-bleeds or at 14 days post-immunization (B1, B2, B3C, and B4C) was assessed for neutralizing ability against the sequence-matched pseudovirus for the SOSIP immunogens used in this study (colored boxes) or tier 1 pseudoviruses (gray boxes) on the left side of the table. Data are arranged by immunization group from left to right, and the immunogen most recently given for the time point in each group is indicated across the top of the table by a colored circle. Pseudovirus neutralization by rabbit immune serum IgG is given as the IC50 (in micrograms per milliliter) of IgG purified from rabbit serum. Samples are indicated by rabbit identification numbers to the left of IC50 values. Higher neutralizing responses are colored.(C) Neutralization of heterologous viruses by SOSIP mixture immunized rabbit, P5672. Virus neutralization as a function of rabbit immune serum IgG concentration is shown for five tier 2 clade AE viruses (92TH is an unconfirmed tier 2 virus), neutralized by the cocktail immunized rabbit P5672. The average percent neutralization and SDs from triplicate experiments are given. Orange, blue, and red curves show neutralization of these same viruses after absorption of the P5672 IgG with WITO (orange), C108 (blue), or CRF250 SOSIPs, respectively.Autologous neutralization peaked after the second boost as reported for BG505SOSIP trimers in rabbits (Figure 3B) (Klasse et al., 2016, McCoy et al., 2016, Sanders et al., 2015). The individual SOSIP trimers appear to differ in their ability to raise autologous nAbs, although group sizes were small. For instance, C108 trimer reproducibly elicited strong autologous neutralization titers in 4 out of 4 animals, while CRF250, WITO, and MGRM8 trimers elicited autologous neutralization titers in 3 out of 4, 1 out of 4, and 0 out of 4 animals, respectively (Figure 3B).In the SOSIP-mixture-immunized group, two animals developed autologous neutralizing titers against the C108 virus, and one of these rabbits (P5672) also developed neutralizing activity against two other immunogen-matched autologous viruses (CRF250 and MGRM8) (Figure 3B). Interestingly, this was the only animal in the study to develop high titers of nAbs to MGRM8 virus, and animals immunized with MGRM8 alone did not. In the sequential immunization group, no animal developed significant neutralizing responses to any of the four immunogens (Figure 3B).Tier 1 viruses expose a number of epitopes that are hidden on tier 2 viruses and can be neutralized by antibodies that target relatively conserved regions and are therefore cross-reactive but not broadly neutralizing against primary isolates (Seaman et al., 2010). Animals in all the immunogen groups developed robust neutralization titers to tier 1a viruses from clades B and C, except for the C108-only group (Figure 3B), but there was no correlation between autologous neutralization and heterologous tier 1 neutralization (Figure S2C).
Eight Tier 2 Viruses Can Be Neutralized by Responses in One Animal Immunized with the Trimer Mix
All animals that showed autologous neutralizing activity after the second boost were screened for neutralizing breadth using a number of tier 2 pseudoviruses selected based on similarity with component immunogen Envs (either gp120 or V1 V2 sequence; Figure S3A). Animal P5672 from the cocktail-immunization group showed neutralizing activity against five heterologous, tier 2 viruses. These included AC10 (subtype-B), R2184.c03, BJOX028000, BJOX25000, and 92TH01 (subtype-AE) viruses (Figure 3C). P5672 neutralization activity against these isolates could be adsorbed by C108 and CRF250, but not WITO, SOSIP trimers (Figures 3C and S3A). These isolates did not lack a common glycan compared with the immunogens (Figure S3B). To investigate the effect of preexisting immunological memory on the elicitation of nAbs, animals originally exposed to only one of the four immunogens were boosted with a mix of all three heterologous trimers used in the study. No high-titer neutralizing responses were elicited to any SOSIPs in the final boost, suggesting these immunogens do not strongly recall preexisting potentially cross-reactive neutralizing responses (Figures 3A and 3B).
Serum-Binding Titers to Env Do Not Predict the Elicitation of Autologous Neutralizing Responses
Serum-antibody-binding titers to Env preparations were determined by ELISA. Rabbit IgG purified from serum was used to generate half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values given in micrograms per milliliter of polyclonal purified IgG. We assessed binding to SOSIP trimers, monomeric gp120s, and V3 peptides (Figure S2A). Similar autologous-binding titers were elicited by all immunogens used in this study. Titers appeared after the first boost and improved only slightly after the second boost. This trend was observed in both SOSIP trimer and gp120 monomer ELISAs. Autologous-binding EC50 values are outlined by immunogen colored boxes in Figure S2A. There was no correlation between autologous gp120 or SOSIP trimer binding titer and autologous nAb responses (Figure S2C). There was a difference in the cross-reactivity of antibody responses generated by the different SOSIP immunogens in gp120 ELISA (Figure S2A). C108SOSIP trimer elicited the lowest levels of antibodies cross-reactive with CRF250, MGRM8 and WITO gp120s. All immunogens elicited SOSIP cross-reactive antibodies. The immunogens also elicited different levels of autologous V3 reactivity when assessed for by ELISA using sequence-matched V3 loop peptides (Figure S2A). C108 elicited relatively low V3 titers, consistent with its inability to elicit good tier 1 neutralizing responses or cross-reactive gp120 antibodies, which suggests that its V3 epitope remains fairly well concealed during immunization. V3 titers, like tier 1 neutralization, did not correlate with autologous neutralizing responses overall (Figure S2C).
Trimer Specificity of nAb Responses
To determine whether the neutralizing responses generated were SOSIP trimer specific, we carried out IgG adsorption assays by pre-incubating IgG purified at the B3C time point with excess sequence-matched D368R trimer or gp120 protein (Figure 4A). As expected, sequence-matched SOSIP trimers adsorbed neutralization activity from all samples (Figure 4A). With respect to sequence-matched monomeric gp120 adsorption, we found that the neutralizing activity was completely adsorbed from the CRF250-immunized group in all three neutralizing rabbits, indicating no trimer-specific neutralizing IgG responses were elicited. The neutralizing samples from WITO, and 3 of 4 C108 immunized rabbits, showed only partial adsorption by sequence-matched gp120, suggesting some preference for a trimeric quaternary epitope. Only one C108-immunized animal (P3902) showed no adsorption by gp120 and presumed full dependence on a trimeric quaternary structure for neutralizing activity (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
Specificities of Neutralizing Responses
(A and B) Trimer dependence of neutralizing abs for the 10 rabbits with high titer neutralizing responses in this experiment are shown. D368R autologous SOSIP or gp120 protein was used to adsorb IgG from bleed “3C” samples before neutralization in the TZMB-l assay. The plots in (A) are neutralization data for 9 rabbits that raised responses to the autologous virus only so the sequence-matched SOSIP or gp120 was used to adsorb IgG in each sample. The plots in (B) are neutralization data for the three viruses that were neutralized by SOSIP mixture immunized rabbit, P5672, after the second boost. Absorption of neutralization by WITO, C108, and CRF250-gp120 or SOSIP was assessed for each virus. Error bars represent SD between replicate data points.
(C) Envelope mutants of the viruses neutralized by rabbit immune IgG were generated as indicated in the left-hand column (HXB2 numbering). These include N160/N156 glycan knockouts, addition of PNG sites at predicted glycan holes, and mutation of the strand-C V2-apex bnAb core epitope of basic residues (169 and 171). In addition, wild-type viruses grown in the presence of kifunensine (Kif) were included. Neutralization IC50s for these different pseudoviruses are given in μg/ml of rabbit IgG (identification number is given across the top). The limit of detection is 100 μg/mL. Titration curves are shown in Figure S4.
(D) BG505 trimer side view (PDB: 5XT3) showing the glycan hole targeted at 234/276 in some immunized rabbits (compare with C). Glycans are absent at positions 234 (blue) and 276 (purple) in CRF250 trimer and 234 in MGRM8. resulting in glycan holes.
Specificities of Neutralizing Responses(A and B) Trimer dependence of neutralizing abs for the 10 rabbits with high titer neutralizing responses in this experiment are shown. D368R autologous SOSIP or gp120 protein was used to adsorb IgG from bleed “3C” samples before neutralization in the TZMB-l assay. The plots in (A) are neutralization data for 9 rabbits that raised responses to the autologous virus only so the sequence-matched SOSIP or gp120 was used to adsorb IgG in each sample. The plots in (B) are neutralization data for the three viruses that were neutralized by SOSIP mixture immunized rabbit, P5672, after the second boost. Absorption of neutralization by WITO, C108, and CRF250-gp120 or SOSIP was assessed for each virus. Error bars represent SD between replicate data points.(C) Envelope mutants of the viruses neutralized by rabbit immune IgG were generated as indicated in the left-hand column (HXB2 numbering). These include N160/N156 glycan knockouts, addition of PNG sites at predicted glycan holes, and mutation of the strand-C V2-apexbnAb core epitope of basic residues (169 and 171). In addition, wild-type viruses grown in the presence of kifunensine (Kif) were included. Neutralization IC50s for these different pseudoviruses are given in μg/ml of rabbit IgG (identification number is given across the top). The limit of detection is 100 μg/mL. Titration curves are shown in Figure S4.(D) BG505 trimer side view (PDB: 5XT3) showing the glycan hole targeted at 234/276 in some immunized rabbits (compare with C). Glycans are absent at positions 234 (blue) and 276 (purple) in CRF250 trimer and 234 in MGRM8. resulting in glycan holes.We performed SOSIP/gp120 adsorption assays on the serum IgG from rabbit P5672. Sequence-matched SOSIP trimers adsorbed the C108, CRF250, and MGRM8 neutralizing activities in this sample as expected, but there was also some cross-strain adsorption of neutralizing activity. CRF250 completely adsorbed the neutralizing activity against MGRM8 virus, suggesting the presence of MGRM8/CRF250 cross-nAbs in this rabbit. None of the immunogen-matched gp120s adsorbed autologous neutralization against any virus, suggesting a dependence of all neutralizing activities on trimeric Env in this rabbit (Figure 4B).
Autologous Neutralizing Responses Predominantly Focus on the Lysine-Rich Region that Forms the Core Epitope for V2-Apex bnAbs
We hypothesized that neutralizing responses were targeting glycan holes on the neutralizing surfaces of the closed trimer immunogens, similar to observations with other SOSIP immunogens (Klasse et al., 2016, McCoy et al., 2016). Therefore, we generated a panel of virus variants in which PNG sites were added at the positions of the putative glycan holes (Figure S3B). We then assayed the effects on the neutralizing activity of IgG samples (Figures 4C and S4A). PNG sites introduced at the V2 apex at residue 130 or within the V2′ region (183–191) reduced the neutralizing activity in seven of the ten neutralizing rabbit IgG samples. These included the only animal that developed neutralizing activity against WITO (P4354), four of the six C108 neutralizing responses (P3901, 3902, 3903, and 5670), and two of the four CRF250 neutralizing responses (3907 and P3898). A similar sensitivity to filling in the glycan holes is seen for the iP versions of prototype V2-apexbnAbs (Figure 1A). This result demonstrates that SOSIP trimers lacking glycans at 130 and within the V2′ region can immunofocus autologous neutralizing responses onto epitopes overlapping those bound by prototype bnAbiPs. To further explore the specificity of the predominant rabbit responses, viruses were made with substitutions in the strand-C basic lysine patch (K169/K171) and with substitutions to remove the N160/N156 glycans, all critical for prototype V2-apexbnAb neutralization (Andrabi et al., 2015). Remarkably, all four C108-elicited neutralization responses, which mapped to the V2 apex, also relied on the strand-C basic patch residues for activity (Figures 4C and S4A). In general, neutralizing responses were unaffected or improved in virus variants lacking the N160 or N156 glycans or against viruses grown in the presence of kifunensine (kif) (Figures 4C and S4A).A minority of neutralizing responses elicited in this study targeted a second glycan hole common to only the CRF250 (HXB2 234/276) and MGRM8 (HXB2 234) immunogens (Figure S3B). These include the CRF250 activity elicited in animal P3906 and both the CRF250 and MGRM8 responses elicited in rabbit P5672 immunized using the SOSIP mixture (Figures 4C and S4A). Overall, the neutralizing responses induced in this study were directed to both trimer-specific epitopes and those found on monomeric gp120. The responses predominantly targeted glycan holes around the apex and the lysine residues that form the core epitope for V2-apexbnAbs.
Neutralizing mAbs Isolated from C108- and CRF250-Trimer-Immunized Rabbits Partially Recapitulate the Corresponding Serum Specificity
To further identify and characterize the fine specificities of the trimer-induced neutralizing responses, we sorted antigen-specific B cells from PBMCs using immunogen-matched trimer probes. The heavy-chain (VH) and light-chain (VL) transcripts from antigen-specific B cells were recovered by single-cell PCR amplification as previously described (McCoy et al., 2016). Only six nAbs were identified from hundreds of antigen-specific B cells derived from all ten neutralizing rabbit PBMC samples, showing that the overwhelming majority of specific antibodies are directed to non-neutralizing epitopes. The neutralizing mAbs include three from one C108-immunized rabbit (P3903; mAbs 3903-1, 3903-2, and 3903-3) and three from two CRF250-immunized rabbits (one from P3907 [mAb 3907-1] and two from P3898 [mAbs 3898-1 and 3898-2]). Antibody germline V, D, and J genes were assigned using the international immunogenetics information system (IMGT) database (Lefranc et al., 1999) and are shown in Figure 5A. The antibodies had CDRH3s between 10 and 17 residues in length, while complementarity-determining region 3 of the light chains (CDRL3s) were between 10 and 15 residues, which is longer than those typically seen in human antibodies. Most mAbs possessed a YD motif at the center of their CDRL3s (at the V-J gene junction), reminiscent of the YYD motif in CAP256.09 and PG9 CDRH3s that are associated with binding to the strand-C basic residues (Figures 5A and S5A). One mAb (3907-1) had a YDDY motif centered on the middle of its 16-amino-acid CDRH3. Two of the three C108 mAbs from animal P3903 (1 and 2) appear to be members of the same lineage despite differing assignments of their light chain (LC) germline V-genes (Figure S5A).
Figure 5
Neutralizing Monoclonal Rabbit Antibodies Derived from Three Different Immunized Animals
(A) Heavy and light (kappa) chains including genetic identity to their most similar O. cuniculus germline genes (from the IMGT database), CDR lengths, and CDR3 sequences. YD motifs in the heavy CDRH3 or kappa CDRL3 loops are highlighted.
(B) Neutralization IC50 values of three C108-specific mAbs (in micrograms per milliliter) are given to the right of values for the parent rabbit immune serum IgG IC50 values for a variety of C108 variants (left column). 3903-1 and 3903-2 are members of a clonal lineage (Figure S5A).
(C) Neutralization IC50 values of CRF250-specific mAbs derived from two different animals. As in (B), parent immune serum IgG IC50 values are given to the left of the values for the mAbs against the virus variants indicated in the left column.
Neutralizing Monoclonal Rabbit Antibodies Derived from Three Different Immunized Animals(A) Heavy and light (kappa) chains including genetic identity to their most similar O. cuniculus germline genes (from the IMGT database), CDR lengths, and CDR3 sequences. YD motifs in the heavy CDRH3 or kappa CDRL3 loops are highlighted.(B) Neutralization IC50 values of three C108-specific mAbs (in micrograms per milliliter) are given to the right of values for the parent rabbit immune serum IgG IC50 values for a variety of C108 variants (left column). 3903-1 and 3903-2 are members of a clonal lineage (Figure S5A).(C) Neutralization IC50 values of CRF250-specific mAbs derived from two different animals. As in (B), parent immune serum IgG IC50 values are given to the left of the values for the mAbs against the virus variants indicated in the left column.Epitope specificities of the mAbs were mapped in the same way as the polyclonal rabbit serum responses shown in Figure 4C. Mostly, mAbs recapitulated the properties of the sera from the source rabbit, with some variations with regards to the effect of the Envglycan variants. Activities of all three C108-specific neutralizing mAbs relied on the strand-C basic residues K169 and K171, as seen for all V2-apexbnAb prototypes. PNG sites introduced to fill glycan holes at 130 or within the V2′ region could reduce their activity, and the effect was strongest for N130, as was observed for iP versions of prototype humanbnAbs (Figures 5B and S4B). The activity of the CRF250-elicited mAbs also showed sensitivity to the strand-C lysines but were variably tolerant of glycans at N130 and within the V2′ (Figures 5B and S4B). No mAb could neutralize the heterologous isolates assayed.Individual mAbs did not necessarily reflect sera in terms of the effects of kif on virus neutralization. Three mAbs showed enhanced or unaltered neutralization of virus grown in kif-treated cells. In contrast, a complete loss of the neutralizing activity was observed for three other mAbs, a property typical of most V2-apexbnAb prototypes (Andrabi et al., 2015, Doores and Burton, 2010).Elimination of N160 and N156 sites had varying effects on autologous neutralization by mAbs. N160 elimination improved neutralization activity for all C108-specific mAbs, while eliminating the N156 glycan site rendered C108 virus non-functional, precluding investigation of neutralization. Elimination of N160 had a minimal effect on CRF250 mAb activity. One CRF250 V2-apex-specific mAb required a glycan at N156 for activity, and the two others showed reduced neutralization without this glycan (Figures 5C and S4B), in contrast to the polyclonal neutralizing response of the source rabbit, which was minimally affected.In all, the six V2-apex-reactive neutralizing mAbs isolated in this study only partially reproduced neutralizing activities present in the source animals. However, they illustrate that a diversity of autologous responses to the V2 apex can be elicited, and some of these recapitulate properties of iP versions of prototype V2-apexbnAbs, including a requirement for basic residues at 169/171 and a sensitivity to glycans at 130 and within the V2′ region. Some mAbs also require N160 and/or N156 glycans for neutralization.
Discussion
HIV vaccine strategies that target specific naive B cells followed by boosts designed to shepherd primed responses toward bnAbs have recently attracted much attention (Burton, 2017, Haynes and Mascola, 2017, Klein et al., 2013, Xiao et al., 2009). For the quaternary V2-apex epitope targets, native Env trimers are likely to be the most appropriate immunogens, and thus, it is key to identify trimers that bind to naive B cell receptors (BCRs) that possess the potential to evolve into bnAb lineages. In vitro binding to iP versions of bnAbs is encouraging, but the true test of value comes in whether the trimers can elicit the appropriate antibodies in vivo. Here, we investigated a range of V2-apexbnAb-iP-binding trimers as immunogens in a rabbit model.First, we showed that a glycan hole (Crooks et al., 2015, Klasse et al., 2016, McCoy et al., 2016) at the trimer apex, resulting from the absence of PNG sites at positions 130 and within the V2′, was strongly associated with binding of iP versions of V2-apexbnAbs. Subsequently, we showed that SOSIP trimers with this glycan hole successfully elicited apex-focused neutralizing responses in rabbits. While induction of V1V2-specific responses has been reported previously in several species (Liao et al., 2013, Zolla-Pazner et al., 2016), none described vaccine elicitation of V2-focused neutralizing responses.The SOSIP immunogens described here differed in their ability to reproducibly elicit apex-neutralizing responses. Trimers C108, CRF250, WITO, and MGRM8 elicited neutralization that could be mapped to the apex in 3 out of 4, 2 out of 4, 1 out of 4, and 0 out of 4 animals, respectively. With a caveat that the group sizes are small, there are several possible reasons these immunogens might elicit neutralizing responses to this epitope with differing consistency: (1) The presence of a glycan hole may be important, as the only immunogen that failed to elicit V2-apex-directed neutralizing responses was MGRM8 SOSIP trimer, which has the least extensive glycan hole. This trimer lacks N130 but it does possess a PNG site within the V2′ region. The V2-apexglycan hole in C108, CRF250, and WITO immunogens should be similar in size, as these isolates possess identical PNG sites in this region of the trimer. Other factors may therefore contribute to differences in immunogenicity here. (2) Differing immunogen stability. The most successful trimer, C108, showed the highest proportion of trimers in a tightly closed native conformation by negative-stain EM and was the most thermostable. In addition, this immunogen had the lowest reactivity to non-neutralizing human mAbs and elicited the lowest levels of tier 1 neutralizing, V3-binding, and gp120 cross-reactive antibodies in rabbits. These data suggest that in addition to being a tightly packed trimer with minimal exposure of non-neutralizing epitopes, this immunogen is stable enough to maintain conformation throughout the immunization process, potentially contributing to its ability to focus responses onto neutralizing epitopes like the apexglycan hole. In general, trimer thermostability was associated with an improved ability to reproducibly elicit autologous neutralization, as has been demonstrated previously (Feng et al., 2016). (3) Differing V2-apex iP reactivity. The most effective immunogens, C108 and CRF250, bind all of the PG9, CH01, and CAP256 prototype iPs, while WITO and MGRM8 are neutralized by only two of these antibodies. Further, WITO and MGRM8 SOSIPs showed the poorest binding to iP/UCA antibodies by BLI, suggesting there are potentially fewer ways for them to trigger naive BCRs. (4) Differing strand-C basic residue sequences. The V2-apex strand-C patch (HXB2 168–171) makes essential contact with prototype V2-apexbnAbs in the form of strong polar interactions involving basic side chains on Env. Notably, one of the trimers that induced less reproducible neutralization, WITO, has an isoleucine residue at the 169 position instead of the more common lysine, which may negatively impact the ability to induce appropriate V2-targeted Abs. Indeed, the limited neutralization coverage of the CAP256 V2-apexbnAbs against the clade B viruses has been associated with the lack of a positively charged residue at position 169 (Doria-Rose et al., 2014, Doria-Rose et al., 2015). Therefore, the chemical nature of strand-C residues in the V2-apex prime and boost immunogens may need to be tightly regulated to favor responses along bnAb developmental pathways.In addition to comparing four iP targeting SOSIPs as immunogens individually, 2 out of 4 rabbits immunized with the SOSIP mixture developed high-titer nAbs to the C108 virus, and one of these (P5672) neutralized viruses corresponding to two of the other immunogens (CRF250 and MGRM8). The mixture was uniquely able to elicit potent neutralizing responses to MGRM8, while 4 out of 4 animals immunized with MGRM8 alone failed to do the same. CRF250 neutralizing activity in P5672 was trimer dependent, whereas all responses elicited using CRF250 immunogen alone were gp120 specific, suggesting a modulation of the neutralizing response to CRF250 in the context of the SOSIP mixture. Animal P5672 also uniquely elicited nAbs to five heterologous tier 2 viruses, and it is of interest to gain a better understanding of how this was accomplished.The range of trimer dependencies in C108- and WITO-immunized animals is interesting given the dominant epitope targeted was mapped to the V2 apex. This epitope is generally trimer dependent for prototype bnAbs. While rare, some strains of HIV, including C108, can bind to PG9 and PG16bnAbs as monomeric gp120s (Figure S1C). This suggests it may be possible to elicit nAbs to this epitope with a range of trimer dependencies for some strains. Alternatively, neutralizing responses may target a V2-apex epitope that does not completely overlap with prototype bnAbs and may not be trimer dependent.We isolated neutralizing mAbs to evaluate whether they possessed lineage properties that show promise for eventual affinity maturation into bnAbs. Like human V2-apex prototype bnAbs, all neutralizing rabbit mAbs recognize the V2 basic region of strand-C lysines (K169/K171) to some degree. Because CDRL3s lengths are longer in the rabbit antibody repertoire than in the human (Lavinder et al., 2014), contact through this complementarity-determining region (CDR) is a distinct possibility. Encouragingly, we found that three out of six mAbs showed dependence on glycans similar to human V2-apexbnAbs (Andrabi et al., 2015), and some mAbs were able to tolerate glycans introduced to fill the V2-apexglycan hole, even at position 130. These features are promising for further affinity maturation toward broad HIV neutralization.In summary, this study describes reproducible vaccine-elicited tier 2 autologous nAb responses directed toward an epitope that overlaps that of prototype V2-apex-directed bnAbs in an outbred animal model, and it provides a starting point from which to test boosting strategies designed to broaden these responses to generate V2-apexbnAbs capable of protecting against global HIV isolates.
Experimental Procedures
Antibodies and Virus Envelopes
Mature, iP, and UCA antibody sequences used in this study are described in Andrabi et al. (2015) and Doria-Rose et al. (2014). Virus envelopes from reference strains previously described (Seaman et al., 2010) were obtained from NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program (ARRR). The sequence of MGRM_AG_002_8 (subtype AG) was obtained from Monogram Biosciences and cloned in to the pSVIII vector as described elsewhere (Helseth et al., 1990). Amino acid point mutations in HIV envelopes were made using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All mutations were verified by DNA sequence analysis (Eton Bioscience).
Virus Production and Neutralization Assay
Single-round infectious HIV-1Env pseudoviruses were made as described previously (Seaman et al., 2010). Briefly, plasmids encoding Env were co-transfected with an Env-deficient backbone plasmid (pSG3ΔENV) using Fugene 6 (Promega). For kif-grown viruses, 25 μM kif was added to 293T cells on the day of transfection. Cell media were harvested 48 hr post-transfection and stored at −80°C. Neutralization of pseudoviruses by IgG samples was measured on TZM-bl target cells, as described previously (Seaman et al., 2010). Neutralizing rabbit serum IgG or mAbs were reported as the antibody concentration that resulted in 50% virus neutralization (IC50) in micrograms IgG per milliliter after fitting the curve of log[antibody] versus percent neutralization in Prism. For neutralization absorption assays, 0.1 mg/mL D368Rgp120 or SOSIP was incubated with 200 μg/mL IgG for 1 hr at 37°C before adding virus and proceeding as above.
Generation of iP-Binding Soluble Native Trimers
HIV-1Env amino acid sequences (GenBank: JN944660 [C108.c03]; GenBank: EU13189 [CRF-T250-4]; GenBank: AY835451 [WITO.4130]; GenBank: MF510462 [MGRM-002-8]) were used to generate codon-optimized SOSIP.664 gp140 genes (Geneart, Life Technologies) for expression of soluble native trimers as described in Sanders et al. (2013). Tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) leader sequences were used and genes were cloned into phCMV vectors (Genlantis) for transient transfection in 293F cells. Secreted trimers were purified from cell supernatants after 5 days using PGT145bnAb antibody affinity columns as described previously (Pugach et al., 2015). D368R versions of these proteins and sequence-matched gp120s were expressed in the same way and purified using Gallanthus nivalis lectin (GNL) (Vector Labs). Affinity-purified proteins were purified by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 10-300 GL column (GE Healthcare) in PBS.
Trimer Characterization
N-glycan site occupancy of trimers was performed as described in Behrens et al. (2016). Negative-stain EM, DSC, and BLI/Octet were performed as described elsewhere (Guenaga et al., 2015).
Ethics Statement
This study was approved and carried out in accordance with protocols provided to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI; La Jolla, CA) under approval number 14-0002. The rabbits were kept, immunized, and bled at TSRI in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act and other federal statutes and regulations relating to animals and in adherence to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 1996).
Immunization and Sampling
20 female 12-week-old New Zealand white rabbits were primed and boosted with 50 μg protein and 100 U Iscomatrix in 600 μL PBS (300 μL IM injection into each hind leg). Blood was drawn from the marginal ear vein into EDTA or untreated blood collection tubes. All procedures were performed in anesthetized animals. EDTA plasmas were diluted three times with PBS and PBMCs purified on a Lymphoprep (STEMCELL Technology) density gradient. PBMCs were cryopreserved in FBS plus 10% DMSO.
Purification of Polyclonal IgG from Serum
Clotted, filtered serum samples were mixed with protein A/G and incubated overnight at 4°C with agitation. Beads were washed with PBS and eluted using 0.1 M citric acid (pH 3.0) and neutralized with 1 M Tris (pH 9.0). Purified IgG was buffer exchanged into PBS and stored at 200 μg/mL at 4°C for neutralization and ELISAs.
ELISA
SOSIP ELISA reagents were randomly biotinylated using a 2:1 molar ratio of biotin reagent to trimer using the EZ-link-NHS-PEG4-Biotin kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 21324) MaxiSorp plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated overnight at 4°C with 2 μg/mL gp120 protein or 2 μg/mL streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Plates were blocked for 1 hr with 3% BSA and washed three times with 0.05% Tween 20-PBS (PBS-T) (pH 7.4). Streptavidin-coated plates were incubated with randomly biotinylated SOSIPs in 1% BSA plus PBS-T for 2 hr and washed three times with PBS-T. Purified rabbit serum IgG or human mAbs were added at a maximum concentration of 200 μg and 10 μg/mL, respectively, serially diluted 1:6 in 1% BSA plus PBS-T, and incubated at room temperature (RT) for 1 hr. Plates were washed three times with PBS-T. Alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human or anti-rabbit IgG Fc secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was diluted 1:500 in 1% BSA PBS-T and added to plates for 1 hr at RT. Plates were washed three times with PBS-T and incubated with phosphatase (Sigma) for 60 min and the absorbance at 405 nm recorded. The bnAb reactivity with biotinylated SOSIPs proved that these reagents contained native epitopes. Direct coating of gp120 on plates showed similar results but better dynamic range than gp120 capture using an anti-C5 antibody.
Rabbit Monoclonal nAbs
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting of cryopreserved PBMCs was performed as described in McCoy et al. (2016). Briefly, IgM−, IgG+, antigen-specific B cells were sorted using randomly biotinylated (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 20217), PGT145-purified SOSIPs (sequence matched to the autologous neutralizing activity in the animal from which the B cells were obtained) as streptavidin-allophycocyanin-bound tetramers (Thermo Fisher Scientific, SA1005). Single cells were sorted into 96-well plates for PCR amplification of heavy and kappa chains using previously described primers and PCR conditions (McCoy et al., 2016). Rabbit antibody variable regions were cloned into an expression plasmid adapted from the pFUSE-rIgG-Fc and pFUSE2-CLIg-rK2 vectors (InvivoGen) under ampicillin selection.
Statistical Analysis
Correlations in data reported in Figures 2 and S2C were assessed in Prism using a two-tailed Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. p values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Heterologous tier 2 virus neutralization titration curves reported in Figure 3C are the average percent neutralizations from three replicate experiments with SDs reported as bars above and below the data points.
Author Contributions
J.E.V., R.A., and L.E.M. designed the experiments. J.E.V., R.A., L.E.M., N.d.V., R.P.F., T.M., C.-Y.S., D.S., S.N.K., F.G., and L.K.P. performed the experiments. R.T.W., A.B.W., M.C., and I.A.W. contributed critical reagents. J.E.V., R.A., and D.R.B. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Authors: M P Lefranc; V Giudicelli; C Ginestoux; J Bodmer; W Müller; R Bontrop; M Lemaitre; A Malik; V Barbié; D Chaume Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 1999-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Jean-Philippe Julien; Jeong Hyun Lee; Albert Cupo; Charles D Murin; Ronald Derking; Simon Hoffenberg; Michael J Caulfield; C Richter King; Andre J Marozsan; Per Johan Klasse; Rogier W Sanders; John P Moore; Ian A Wilson; Andrew B Ward Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hua-Xin Liao; Mattia Bonsignori; S Munir Alam; Jason S McLellan; Georgia D Tomaras; M Anthony Moody; Daniel M Kozink; Kwan-Ki Hwang; Xi Chen; Chun-Yen Tsao; Pinghuang Liu; Xiaozhi Lu; Robert J Parks; David C Montefiori; Guido Ferrari; Justin Pollara; Mangala Rao; Kristina K Peachman; Sampa Santra; Norman L Letvin; Nicos Karasavvas; Zhi-Yong Yang; Kaifan Dai; Marie Pancera; Jason Gorman; Kevin Wiehe; Nathan I Nicely; Supachai Rerks-Ngarm; Sorachai Nitayaphan; Jaranit Kaewkungwal; Punnee Pitisuttithum; James Tartaglia; Faruk Sinangil; Jerome H Kim; Nelson L Michael; Thomas B Kepler; Peter D Kwong; John R Mascola; Gary J Nabel; Abraham Pinter; Susan Zolla-Pazner; Barton F Haynes Journal: Immunity Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Marie Pancera; Syed Shahzad-Ul-Hussan; Nicole A Doria-Rose; Jason S McLellan; Robert T Bailer; Kaifan Dai; Sandra Loesgen; Mark K Louder; Ryan P Staupe; Yongping Yang; Baoshan Zhang; Robert Parks; Joshua Eudailey; Krissey E Lloyd; Julie Blinn; S Munir Alam; Barton F Haynes; Mohammed N Amin; Lai-Xi Wang; Dennis R Burton; Wayne C Koff; Gary J Nabel; John R Mascola; Carole A Bewley; Peter D Kwong Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2013-05-26 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: Penny L Moore; Elin S Gray; C Kurt Wibmer; Jinal N Bhiman; Molati Nonyane; Daniel J Sheward; Tandile Hermanus; Shringkhala Bajimaya; Nancy L Tumba; Melissa-Rose Abrahams; Bronwen E Lambson; Nthabeleng Ranchobe; Lihua Ping; Nobubelo Ngandu; Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Salim S Abdool Karim; Ronald I Swanstrom; Michael S Seaman; Carolyn Williamson; Lynn Morris Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-10-21 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Rogier W Sanders; Ronald Derking; Albert Cupo; Jean-Philippe Julien; Anila Yasmeen; Natalia de Val; Helen J Kim; Claudia Blattner; Alba Torrents de la Peña; Jacob Korzun; Michael Golabek; Kevin de Los Reyes; Thomas J Ketas; Marit J van Gils; C Richter King; Ian A Wilson; Andrew B Ward; P J Klasse; John P Moore Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Jinal N Bhiman; Colin Anthony; Nicole A Doria-Rose; Owen Karimanzira; Chaim A Schramm; Thandeka Khoza; Dale Kitchin; Gordon Botha; Jason Gorman; Nigel J Garrett; Salim S Abdool Karim; Lawrence Shapiro; Carolyn Williamson; Peter D Kwong; John R Mascola; Lynn Morris; Penny L Moore Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Peng Zhang; Elisabeth Narayanan; Qingbo Liu; Yaroslav Tsybovsky; Kristin Boswell; Shilei Ding; Zonghui Hu; Dean Follmann; Yin Lin; Huiyi Miao; Hana Schmeisser; Denise Rogers; Samantha Falcone; Sayda M Elbashir; Vladimir Presnyak; Kapil Bahl; Madhu Prabhakaran; Xuejun Chen; Edward K Sarfo; David R Ambrozak; Rajeev Gautam; Malcom A Martin; Joanna Swerczek; Richard Herbert; Deborah Weiss; Johnathan Misamore; Giuseppe Ciaramella; Sunny Himansu; Guillaume Stewart-Jones; Adrian McDermott; Richard A Koup; John R Mascola; Andrés Finzi; Andrea Carfi; Anthony S Fauci; Paolo Lusso Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Anna-Janina Behrens; Abhinav Kumar; Max Medina-Ramirez; Albert Cupo; Kevin Marshall; Victor M Cruz Portillo; David J Harvey; Gabriel Ozorowski; Nicole Zitzmann; Ian A Wilson; Andrew B Ward; Weston B Struwe; John P Moore; Rogier W Sanders; Max Crispin Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Hui Li; Shuyi Wang; Fang-Hua Lee; Ryan S Roark; Alex I Murphy; Jessica Smith; Chengyan Zhao; Juliette Rando; Neha Chohan; Yu Ding; Eunlim Kim; Emily Lindemuth; Katharine J Bar; Ivona Pandrea; Cristian Apetrei; Brandon F Keele; Jeffrey D Lifson; Mark G Lewis; Thomas N Denny; Barton F Haynes; Beatrice H Hahn; George M Shaw Journal: J Virol Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Sonu Kumar; Xiaohe Lin; Timothy Ngo; Benjamin Shapero; Cindy Sou; Joel D Allen; Jeffrey Copps; Lei Zhang; Gabriel Ozorowski; Linling He; Max Crispin; Andrew B Ward; Ian A Wilson; Jiang Zhu Journal: mBio Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 7.867