| Literature DB >> 28978101 |
Xin Wang1, Ming-Ming Cui1, Yangyang Xu2,3, Li Liu3, Ye Niu4, Tiemin Liu1,5, Zhi-Ping Liu6, Rui-Tao Wang1,3, Kai-Jiang Yu7,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Altered mean platelet volume (MPV) is implicated in a wide range of cancers. However, the prognostic role of MPV in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the predictive significance of MPV in MIBC.Entities:
Keywords: bladder cancer; mean platelet volume; prognosis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28978101 PMCID: PMC5620241 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Optimized cut-off value was determined for MPV using standard ROC curve analysis
Baseline characteristics of the patients according to MPV levels
| Variables | Total | MPV > 9.1 | MPV ≤ 9.1 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | ||
| Age (years) | 0.657 | |||
| ≤ 65 | 123 (56.4) | 45 (58.4) | 78 (55.3) | |
| > 65 | 95 (43.6) | 32 (41.6) | 63 (44.7) | |
| Gender | 0.665 | |||
| Male | 172 (78.9) | 62 (80.5) | 110 (78.0) | |
| Female | 46 (21.1) | 15 (19.5) | 31 (22.0) | |
| T stage | < 0.001 | |||
| T2 | 144 (66.1) | 53 (9.2) | 91 (19.2) | |
| T3 | 26 (11.9) | 11 (50.4) | 15 (50.4) | |
| T4 | 48 (22.0) | 13 (40.4) | 35 (30.4) | |
| Histology grade | 0.028 | |||
| G1+G2 | 114 (52.3) | 48 (62.3) | 66 (46.8) | |
| G3 | 104 (47.7) | 29 (37.7) | 75 (53.2) | |
| Multiplicity | 0.474 | |||
| Solitary | 126 (57.8) | 47 (61.0) | 79 (56.0) | |
| Multifocal | 92 (42.2) | 30 (39.0) | 62 (44.0) | |
| Growth pattern | 0.699 | |||
| Papillary | 84 (38.5) | 31 (40.3) | 53 (37.6) | |
| Non-papillary | 134 (61.5) | 46 (59.7) | 88 (62.4) | |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 0.081 | |||
| Yes | 82 (37.6) | 23 (29.9) | 59 (41.8) | |
| No | 136 (62.4) | 54 (70.1) | 82 (58.2) |
MPV, mean platelet volume.
Baseline characteristics of the patients according to MPV levels
| Variables | MPV > 9.1 | MPV ≤ 9.1 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 62.2 (9.5) | 63.8 (8.7) | 0.189 |
| Gender (male, %) | 62 (80.5) | 110 (78.0) | 0.665 |
| Smoker (n, %) | 15 (19.5) | 23 (16.3) | 0.556 |
| Drinking (n, %) | 8 (10.4) | 16 (11.3) | 0.829 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.4(3.0) | 23.5 (3.1) | 0.781 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 5.10 (4.80-5.55) | 5.00 (4.70-5.30) | 0.040 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 7.25 (2.87) | 7.06 (2.53) | 0.615 |
| Neutrophils (×109/L) | 4.54 (2.49) | 4.60 (2.35) | 0.876 |
| Lymphocytes (×109/L) | 2.03 (0.71) | 1.80 (0.56) | 0.017 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 138.2 (17.0) | 133.5 (18.4) | 0.068 |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 199.2 (51.1) | 223.1 (65.7) | 0.003 |
| PDW (%) | 17.2 (1.2) | 16.7 (0.8) | < 0.001 |
| NLR | 2.80 (2.67) | 2.70 (2.17) | 0.760 |
| PLR | 119.1 (58.3) | 128.3 (52.6) | 0.238 |
Data are expressed as means (SD) or median (IQR). FPG, fasting plasma glucose; WBC, white blood cell; BMI, body mass index; MPV, mean platelet volume; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival in MIBC patients
Result of the univariate analysis of overall survival in patients with bladder cancer
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) (≥ 65 versus < 65) | 2.263 | 1.336-3.831 | 0.002 |
| Gender (male versus female) | 0.569 | 0.270-1.200 | 0.138 |
| Smoker (yes versus no) | 1.019 | 0.515-2.014 | 0.957 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.957 | 0.879-1.042 | 0.311 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 0.879 | 0.564-1.370 | 0.569 |
| WBC (×109/L) | 1.064 | 0.978-1.158 | 0.148 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 1.002 | 0.987-1.018 | 0.778 |
| Platelet count (×109/L) | 1.000 | 0.996-1.004 | 0.945 |
| MPV (fL) (≤ 9.1 versus > 9.1) | 2.274 | 1.226-4.217 | 0.009 |
| PDW (%) | 0.833 | 0.631-1.101 | 0.199 |
| NLR | 1.082 | 0.997-1.175 | 0.060 |
| PLR | 1.004 | 1.000-1.008 | 0.070 |
| Histology Grade | |||
| (G3 versus G1+G2) | 3.482 | 1.995-6.078 | < 0.001 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | |||
| (Yes versus No) | 3.262 | 1.925-5.527 | < 0.001 |
| Multiplicity | |||
| (Multifocal versus Solitary) | 0.696 | 0.405-1.196 | 0.189 |
| Growth Pattern | |||
| (Papillary versus Non-papillary) | 0.374 | 0.198-0.706 | 0.002 |
| T stage | |||
| (T3+T4 versus T2) | 1.648 | 0.982-2.765 | 0.059 |
| Chemotherapy (yes versus no) | 0.802 | 0.380-1.691 | 0.562 |
Abbreviations: see to Tables 1 and 2.
Result of the multivariate analysis of overall survival in patients with bladder cancer
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) (≥ 65 versus < 65) | 1.785 | 1.037-3.074 | 0.031 |
| MPV (fL) (≤ 9.1 versus > 9.1) | 2.023 | 1.050-3.897 | 0.025 |
| NLR | 1.000 | 0.994-1.007 | 0.892 |
| PLR | 1.062 | 0.923-1.223 | 0.402 |
| Histology Grade | |||
| (G3 versus G1+G2) | 3.404 | 1.902-6.090 | < 0.001 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | |||
| (Yes versus No) | 3.272 | 1.805-5.933 | < 0.001 |
| Growth Pattern | |||
| (Papillary versus Non-papillary) | 0.419 | 0.208-0.841 | 0.014 |
| T stage | |||
| (T3+T4 versus T2) | 0.546 | 0.288-1.037 | 0.064 |
CI, confidence interval. Abbreviations: see to Tables 1 and 2.