Literature DB >> 28977417

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for improving diagnosis of infection in patients on CF-LVAD: longing for more 'insights'.

Angelo M Dell'Aquila1, Nemanja Avramovic2, Stefano Mastrobuoni3, Arash Motekallemi1, Konrad Wisniewski1, Mirela Scherer1, Jürgen R Sindermann1, Christian Wenning2,4.   

Abstract

Aim: Presence and consequent extent of infection in patients on continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) can be challenging with the current diagnostic tools. The present study sought to demonstrate the diagnostic power of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron-Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in detecting infection in patients supported with CF-LVAD. Background: The present study sought to demonstrate the diagnostic power of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in detecting infection in patients supported with CF-LVAD. Methods and results: Between July 2009 and April 2016, 61 PET/CT examinations were performed in 47 patients (median age 64.13 years, IQR 18.77) supported with a CF-LVAD. PET/CT assessments were performed qualitatively and quantitatively at three different levels: at the piercing site of driveline (first level), along the intracorporeal course of driveline (second level), and around the device (third level). Final diagnosis of LVAD infection was prospectively performed and was based upon microbiological samples taken at hospital admission, during the surgical revision/transplantation and recurrence of symptoms on long-term follow-up. At last follow-up a total of 40 (65.57%) final diagnoses of LVAD-infection could be ascertained. Matching the final diagnosis with the PET/CT assessments the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were 90.0, 71.4, 85.71, and 78.94%, respectively. Level sub-analyses of SUV max showed an optimal discriminator power for levels 1 and 2 (AUC of level 1-0.824, P < 0.001; AUC of level 2-0.849, P < 0.001, respectively). At the third level semi-quantitative analysis showed poor discriminator power (AUC 0.589, P = 0.33). Qualitative visual analysis instead indicated a trend toward significance (P = 0.07). Conclusions: Quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT is an optimal diagnostic tool in detecting superficial and deep driveline infections. However, diagnostic accuracy with regard to the diagnosis of pump housing infection is limited. Here, clinical and qualitative PET/CT analyses must be better considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28977417     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  12 in total

1.  Diagnosis of infection in patients with left ventricular assist device: PET or SPECT?

Authors:  Damien Legallois; Alain Manrique
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  FDG-PET for the detection of infection in left ventricle assist device: Is there light at the end of the tunnel?

Authors:  Fabien Hyafil; François Rouzet; Khadija Benali
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Positron emission tomography objective parameters for assessment of left ventricular assist device infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Saul N Friedman; Maryam Mahmood; Jennifer R Geske; Muhammad Rizwan Sohail; Geoffrey B Johnson; John M Stulak; Ayse Tuba Kendi
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of FDG PET/CT in Suspected LVAD Infections: A Case Series, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Marty C Tam; Vaiibhav N Patel; Richard L Weinberg; Edward A Hulten; Keith D Aaronson; Francis D Pagani; James R Corbett; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-17

5.  18F-FDG PET/CT in Left-Ventricular Assist Device Infection: Initial Results Supporting the Usefulness of Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Jan M Sommerlath Sohns; Hannah Kröhn; Alexandra Schöde; Thorsten Derlin; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 11.082

6.  Contributory Role of Positron Emission Tomography in a Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipient at the Time of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Antonio Loforte; Gregorio Gliozzi; Sofia Martin Suarez; Davide Pacini
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 7.  In Full Flow: Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Radoslav Zinoviev; Christopher K Lippincott; Sara C Keller; Nisha A Gilotra
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 8.  The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of device-related infections in patients with a left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D Ten Hove; G Treglia; R H J A Slart; K Damman; M Wouthuyzen-Bakker; D F Postma; O Gheysens; R J H Borra; G Mecozzi; P P van Geel; B Sinha; A W J M Glaudemans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Procedural recommendations of cardiac PET/CT imaging: standardization in inflammatory-, infective-, infiltrative-, and innervation- (4Is) related cardiovascular diseases: a joint collaboration of the EACVI and the EANM: summary.

Authors:  Riemer H J A Slart; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Olivier Gheysens; Mark Lubberink; Tanja Kero; Marc R Dweck; Gilbert Habib; Oliver Gaemperli; Antti Saraste; Alessia Gimelli; Panagiotis Georgoulias; Hein J Verberne; Jan Bucerius; Christoph Rischpler; Fabien Hyafil; Paola A Erba
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the infection of heart.

Authors:  Eunjung Kong
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2020-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.