Literature DB >> 28977386

Lower limit of normality and clinical relevance of left ventricular early diastolic strain rate for the detection of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

Daniel A Morris1, Masaaki Takeuchi2, Satoshi Nakatani3, Yutaka Otsuji2, Evgeny Belyavskiy1, Radhakrishnan Aravind Kumar1, Athanasios Frydas1, Martin Kropf1, Robin Kraft1, Esteban Marquez4, Engin Osmanoglou5, Maximilian Krisper1, Clemens Köhncke1, Leif-Hendrik Boldt1, Wilhelm Haverkamp1, Carsten Tschöpe1,6, Frank Edelmann1,6,7, Burkert Pieske1,6,7,8, Elisabeth Pieske-Kraigher1.   

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the present study was to determine the lower limit of normality and the clinical relevance of left ventricular (LV) early diastolic strain rate (LVSRe) for the detection of LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD). Methods and results: Using 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography, we analysed 377 healthy subjects and 475 patients with risk for LVDD with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF). The normal range of LVSRe analysing the healthy subjects was 1.56 ± 0.28 s-1, with a lower limit of normality at 1.00 s-1. Using this cut-off, LVSRe was able to detect high rates of LV diastolic alterations (rate 71.1%), which was significantly better than using indirect diastolic parameters such as left atrial volume index (LAVI) and tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TR) (rates 22.9% and 9.1%) and similar to annular mitral parameters such as lateral and septal e' velocity (rates 70.9% and 72.4%). In line, adding LVSRe to the current evaluation of LVDD increased significantly the rate of detection of LVDD (absolute rate of increase 18.9%; rate of detection of LVDD: from 14.3% to 33.2%, P < 0.01). Regarding the clinical relevance of LVSRe, patients with abnormal LVSRe (i.e. <1.00 s-1) had significantly worse New York Heart Association functional class and symptomatic status than those with normal LVSRe. In addition, in a retrospective post hoc analysis, we found that an abnormal LVSRe had a significant association with the risk of heart failure hospitalization at 2 years (odds ratio 5.0, 95% confidence interval 1.3-18.4), which was better than using conventional diastolic parameters such as septal and lateral e' velocity, LAVI and TR velocity.
Conclusion: The findings from this multicentre study provide important data regarding the normal range of LVSRe and highlight the potential clinical relevance of using this new diastolic parameter in the detection of LVDD in patients with preserved LVEF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28977386     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jex185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure in patients with preserved ejection fraction using cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Chengjie Gao; Yijing Tao; Jingwei Pan; Chengxing Shen; Jiayin Zhang; Zhili Xia; Qing Wan; Hao Wu; Yajie Gao; Hong Shen; Zhigang Lu; Meng Wei
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Cardiovascular disease in young People with Type 1 Diabetes: Search for Cardiovascular Biomarkers.

Authors:  Michal Schäfer; Kristen J Nadeau; Jane E B Reusch
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.852

3.  Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and exercise intolerance in obese heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  T Jake Samuel; Dalane W Kitzman; Mark J Haykowsky; Bharathi Upadhya; Peter Brubaker; M Benjamin Nelson; W Gregory Hundley; Michael D Nelson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in bicupsid aortic valve patients: head-to-head comparison between computed tomography, 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and speckle-tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Allard T van den Hoven; Sultan Yilmazer; Raluca G Chelu; Roderick W J van Grootel; Savine C S Minderhoud; Lidia R Bons; An M van Berendoncks; Anthonie L Duijnhouwer; Hans-Marc J Siebelink; Annemien E van den Bosch; Ricardo P J Budde; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Alexander Hirsch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  3-Year Follow-Up of Radiation-Associated Changes in Diastolic Function by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography.

Authors:  Suvi Sirkku Tuohinen; Tanja Skyttä; Heini Huhtala; Tuija Poutanen; Vesa Virtanen; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Pekka Raatikainen
Journal:  JACC CardioOncol       Date:  2021-06-15

Review 6.  Advances in Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging in the Diagnosis of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Alberico Del Torto; Andrea Igoren Guaricci; Francesca Pomarico; Marco Guglielmo; Laura Fusini; Francesco Monitillo; Daniela Santoro; Monica Vannini; Alexia Rossi; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Andrea Baggiano; Gianluca Pontone
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-09

7.  Longitudinal Assessment of Cardiac Outcomes of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children Associated With COVID-19 Infections.

Authors:  Daisuke Matsubara; Joyce Chang; Hunter L Kauffman; Yan Wang; Sumekala Nadaraj; Chandni Patel; Stephen M Paridon; Mark A Fogel; Michael D Quartermain; Anirban Banerjee
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.106

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.