Madelon B Bronner1, Minh Hao Nguyen1, Ellen M A Smets2, Anthony W H van de Ven3, Julia C M van Weert1. 1. Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Gastrointestinal Oncological Center Amsterdam (GIOCA), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Studies on anxiety within oncology show a high prevalence of anxiety both during and after the course of the disease. However, little is known about factors that influence the level of anxiety in the diagnostic phase. This study examines the presence of anxiety during diagnosis and treatment planning and explores how a monitoring (ie, information seeking) coping style and the suggested treatment plan (ie, with or without chemotherapy) interact with anxiety. METHODS: Anxiety scores (6-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) were collected from 81 colorectal cancer patients before and after their visit to the outpatient Gastrointestinal Oncological Center Amsterdam. A cut-off score (>44) was used to indicate highly anxious patients. RESULTS: More than half (59%) of the patients were classified as highly anxious before consultation. Although anxiety scores significantly decreased after consultation (t = 3.149, P = .002), 37% of the patients remained highly anxious. Reductions in anxiety were specifically observed for patients with a higher monitoring coping style and patients for whom a treatment plan without chemotherapy was proposed. Interestingly, high monitors for whom treatment without chemotherapy was proposed showed a major decrease in anxiety, whereas low monitors for whom treatment starting with chemotherapy was proposed showed a great increase in anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic phase is associated with high levels of anxiety. Distinct patterns of anxiety were identified, depending on patients' coping style and the suggested treatment plan. Remarkably, patients with a lower monitoring coping style became particularly anxious when they were advised to start treatment with chemotherapy.
OBJECTIVE: Studies on anxiety within oncology show a high prevalence of anxiety both during and after the course of the disease. However, little is known about factors that influence the level of anxiety in the diagnostic phase. This study examines the presence of anxiety during diagnosis and treatment planning and explores how a monitoring (ie, information seeking) coping style and the suggested treatment plan (ie, with or without chemotherapy) interact with anxiety. METHODS:Anxiety scores (6-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) were collected from 81 colorectal cancerpatients before and after their visit to the outpatient Gastrointestinal Oncological Center Amsterdam. A cut-off score (>44) was used to indicate highly anxious patients. RESULTS: More than half (59%) of the patients were classified as highly anxious before consultation. Although anxiety scores significantly decreased after consultation (t = 3.149, P = .002), 37% of the patients remained highly anxious. Reductions in anxiety were specifically observed for patients with a higher monitoring coping style and patients for whom a treatment plan without chemotherapy was proposed. Interestingly, high monitors for whom treatment without chemotherapy was proposed showed a major decrease in anxiety, whereas low monitors for whom treatment starting with chemotherapy was proposed showed a great increase in anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic phase is associated with high levels of anxiety. Distinct patterns of anxiety were identified, depending on patients' coping style and the suggested treatment plan. Remarkably, patients with a lower monitoring coping style became particularly anxious when they were advised to start treatment with chemotherapy.
Authors: Han Zhang; Michael Xie; Stuart D Archibald; B Stanley Jackson; Michael K Gupta Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Lisa Beatty; Emma Kemp; Jane Turner; Phyllis Butow; Donna Milne; Patsy Yates; Sylvie Lambert; Addie Wootten; Bogda Koczwara Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Minh Hao Nguyen; Ellen Ma Smets; Nadine Bol; Eugène F Loos; Hanneke Wm van Laarhoven; Debby Geijsen; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kristien Maj Tytgat; Julia Cm van Weert Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Loai Abu Sharour; Omar Al Omari; Malakeh Z Malak; Ayman Bani Salameh; Dalal Yehia; Maha Subih; Mohammad Alrshoud Journal: Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Date: 2019-06-24
Authors: Melanie de Looper; Julia C M van Weert; Barbara C Schouten; Sifra Bolle; Eric H J Belgers; Eric H Eddes; Ellen M A Smets Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Minh Hao Nguyen; Nadine Bol; Julia C M van Weert; Eugène F Loos; Kristien M A J Tytgat; Debby Geijsen; Ellen Drenth; Meriam Janse; Ellen M A Smets Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 2.520