Literature DB >> 28976476

Comparison of Unenhanced T1-Weighted Signal Intensities Within the Dentate Nucleus and the Globus Pallidus After Serial Applications of Gadopentetate Dimeglumine Versus Gadobutrol in a Pediatric Population.

Diane M Renz, Stefanie Kümpel, Joachim Böttcher, Alexander Pfeil, Florian Streitparth, Matthias Waginger, Jürgen R Reichenbach, Ulf K Teichgräber, Hans-Joachim Mentzel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare changes in T1-weighted signal intensity (SI) within the dentate nucleus (DN) and globus pallidus (GP) in a pediatric population after serial applications of the linear gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast medium gadopentetate dimeglumine and the more stable macrocyclic agent gadobutrol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Two similar pediatric patient cohorts who underwent at least 3 serial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations with sole application of gadopentetate dimeglumine or gadobutrol were analyzed. All MRI examinations were performed on a 1.5 T system acquiring unenhanced T1-weighted spin echo sequences, which were evaluated on the baseline MRI and after the contrast medium administrations. For analysis of SI changes in the DN, the ratios of the DN to the pons (P) and to the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) were assessed. The GP was compared with the thalamus (TH) by dividing the SIs between GP and TH (GP-to-TH ratio).
RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (13 boys, 15 girls; mean age, 8.4 ± 6.8 years) who received at least 3 applications of gadopentetate dimeglumine and 25 patients (13 boys, 12 girls; mean age, 9.7 ± 5.4 years) with 3 or more gadobutrol injections were included. After 3 administrations of gadopentetate dimeglumine, the T1-weighted SI ratios significantly increased: mean difference value of 0.036 ± 0.031 (DN-to-P; P < 0.001), 0.034 ± 0.032 (DN-to-MCP; P < 0.001), and 0.025 ± 0.025 (GP-to-TH; P = 0.001). In a subanalysis of 12 patients with more than 3 injections of gadopentetate dimeglumine, the mean differences of the SI ratios were slightly higher: 0.043 ± 0.032 (DN-to-P; P = 0.001), 0.041 ± 0.035 (DN-to-MCP; P = 0.002), and 0.028 ± 0.025 (GP-to-TH; P = 0.003). In contrast, gadobutrol did not show a significant influence on the SI ratios, neither after 3 nor after more than 3 applications.
CONCLUSIONS: The T1-weighted SI increase within the DN and GP after serial administrations of the linear contrast medium gadopentetate dimeglumine, but not after serial applications of the macrocyclic agent gadobutrol, found in a pediatric population, is consistent with results published for adult patients. The clinical impact of the intracranial T1-hyperintensities is currently unclear. However, in accordance with the recent decision of the Pharmacovigilance and Risk Assessment Committee of the European Medicines Agency, intravenous macrocyclic agents should be preferred and MR contrast media should be used with caution and awareness of the pediatric brain development in children and adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28976476     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  13 in total

1.  [Imaging of abdominal tumors in childhood and adolescence : Part I: Background, hepatic, splenic and pancreatic tumors].

Authors:  D M Renz; H-J Mentzel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Post-marketing surveillance of gadobutrol for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshito Tsushima; Kazuo Awai; Gen Shinoda; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Masayuki Chosa; Toshiyuki Sunaya; Jan Endrikat
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Standardized assessment of the signal intensity increase on unenhanced T1-weighted images in the brain: the European Gadolinium Retention Evaluation Consortium (GREC) Task Force position statement.

Authors:  Carlo C Quattrocchi; Joana Ramalho; Aart J van der Molen; Àlex Rovira; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The Effects of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents on the Cerebellum: from Basic Research to Neurological Practice and from Pregnancy to Adulthood.

Authors:  Winda Ariyani; Miski Aghnia Khairinisa; Gaetano Perrotta; Mario Manto; Noriyuki Koibuchi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Gadolinium deposition within the paediatric brain: no increased intrinsic T1-weighted signal intensity within the dentate nucleus following the administration of a minimum of four doses of the macrocyclic agent gadobutrol.

Authors:  Jonathan R Young; Joe Qiao; Iren Orosz; Noriko Salamon; Mark A Franke; Hyun J Kim; Whitney B Pope
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Contrast-Free Detection of Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  Maria Eleni Karakatsani; Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Michael Liu; Sachin R Jambawalikar; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 4.756

7.  Gadolinium Retention, Brain T1 Hyperintensity, and Endogenous Metals: A Comparative Study of Macrocyclic Versus Linear Gadolinium Chelates in Renally Sensitized Rats.

Authors:  Marlène Rasschaert; Andréa Emerit; Nathalie Fretellier; Cécile Factor; Philippe Robert; Jean-Marc Idée; Claire Corot
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  [Imaging of tumor predisposition syndromes].

Authors:  K Glutig; A Pfeil; D M Renz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 9.  Gadolinium Deposition in Brain: Current Scientific Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Bang J Guo; Zhen L Yang; Long J Zhang
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.639

Review 10.  Gadobutrol: A Review in Contrast-Enhanced MRI and MRA.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.