Literature DB >> 28976428

Acetabular Reconstructions with Impaction Bone-Grafting and a Cemented Cup in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age: A Concise Follow-up, at 27 to 35 Years, of a Previous Report.

Marloes W J L Schmitz1, Gerjon Hannink, Jean W M Gardeniers, Nico Verdonschot, Tom J J H Slooff, B Willem Schreurs.   

Abstract

We present an update of 19 acetabular reconstructions, performed with a cemented total hip arthroplasty and impaction bone-grafting, in situ at the time of our previous report. At a mean follow-up of 30 years (range, 27 to 35 years), no additional patients were lost to follow-up. Two patients (3 reconstructions) died for reasons unrelated to the hip surgery. Five reconstructions (5 patients) were revised, 4 for aseptic loosening and 1 for septic loosening, after a mean of 24 years (range, 22 to 27 years), leaving 11 surviving hips (11 patients) that were clinically and radiographically evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival at 30 years was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.56) for revision for any reason, 0.56 (95% CI, 0.35 to 0.73) for aseptic loosening, and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.69) for radiographic loosening. Competing risk analysis showed that Kaplan-Meier analysis overestimates the revision risk by 18% for revision for any reason and 22% for aseptic loosening. Cemented impaction bone-grafting is a reasonable long-term solution for demanding primary and revision acetabular reconstructions in young patients with acetabular bone defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28976428     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  4 in total

Review 1.  Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco D'Apolito; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Qiang Xiao; Haoyang Wang; Kai Zhou; Duan Wang; Tingxian Ling; Fuxing Pei; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Impaction Bone Grafting with Low Dose Irradiated Freeze-Dried Allograft Bone for Acetabular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hongxing Li; Kelvin Guoping Tan; Zhiling Li; Xiaoxin Wu; Guangping Cai; Weihong Zhu; Tianlong Huang; Wanchun Wang; Ross Crawford; Xinzhan Mao
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?

Authors:  Jason Verspeek; Thijs A Nijenhuis; Martijn F L Kuijpers; Wim H C Rijnen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.