| Literature DB >> 28975923 |
Collin Anderson1, Mark MacKay2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Determine the stability of fentanyl 10 mcg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride, fentanyl 10 mcg/mL in 5% dextrose, fentanyl 50 mcg/mL, hydromorphone 100 mcg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride, ketamine 10 mg/mL, midazolam 0.4 mg/mL in 5% dextrose, midazolam 5 mg/mL, morphine 1 mg/mL in 0.9% sodium chloride, morphine 1 mg/mL in 5% dextrose, and pentobarbital 50 mg/mL when stored as single drug entities at room temperature in polypropylene syringes.Entities:
Keywords: fentanyl; hydromorphone; ketamine; midazolam; morphine; pentobarbital; pharmacy; stability
Year: 2015 PMID: 28975923 PMCID: PMC5597115 DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy3040379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmacy (Basel) ISSN: 2226-4787
Batch Compounded Controlled Substance Drips.
| Concentration | Volume (mL) | |
|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl | 10 mcg/mL | 10, 30 |
| Fentanyl | 50 mcg/mL | 10, 30 |
| Midazolam | 0.4 mg/mL | 10, 30 |
| Midazolam | 5 mg/mL | 10, 30 |
| Morphine | 1 mg/mL | 10, 30 |
Stability of Batch Compounded Controlled Substances.
| Conditions/Results | Fentanyl | Fentanyl | Fentanyl | Hydro-morphone | Ketamine | Midazolam | Midazolam | Morphine | Morphine | Pento-barbital |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| concentration | 10 mcg/mL in NS | 10 mcg/mL in D5W | 50 mcg/mL | 100 mcg/mL in NS | 10 mg/mL | 5 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL in D5W | 1 mg/mL in NS | 1 mg/mL in D5W | 50 mg/mL |
| mobile phase(buffer: ACN) | 75:25 | 75:25 | 65:35 | 65:35 | 85:15 | 70:30 | 70:30 | 97.5:2.5 | 97.5:2.5 | 65:35 |
| detection wavelength (nm) | 210 | 210 | 210 | 254 | 210 | 254 | 254 | 210 | 210 | 210 |
| injection volume (µL) | 12.5 | 12.5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| retention time (min) | 5.46 | 5.46 | 1.89 | 2.62 | 3.55 | 2.58 | 2.58 | 3.88 | 3.88 | 4.17 |
| Degradants a (min) | 0.9 (a,b) | 0.9 (a,b) | 0.8 (a,b) | 1.3 (a,b) | 1.9 (a), 2.3 (a) | 1.0 (b) | 1.0 (b) | 3.1 (a, b, p) | 3.1 (a, b, p) | ppt (a) |
| initial (concentration)b | 10.6 ± 0.1 | 10.0 ± 0.1 | 48.3 ± 0.4 | 98.6 ± 0.3 | 10.1 ± 0.02 | 5.06 ± 0.06 | 0.397 ± 0.001 | 1.05 ± 0.004 | 1.02 ± 0.01 | 48.8 ± 0.8 |
| week 7–8 | 104.0 ± 1.9 | 101.7 ± 3.9 | 102.7 ± 3.2 | 94.2 ± 1.6 | 102.2 ± 0.4 | 97.2 ± 1.9 | 98.5 ± 0.5 | 100.9 ± 0.2 | 100.8 ± 0.6 | 99.6 ± 2.0 |
| day 100 | 101.7 ± 3.0 | 104.0 ± 3.3 | 98.3 ± 4.4 | 90.3 ± 0.7 | 100.5 ± 1.5 | 96.5 ± 2.6 | 96.4 ± 1.7 | 101.1 ± 0.3 | 100.9 ± 1.0 | 102.2 ± 2.2 |
| Linearity | 0.9992 | 0.9992 | 0.9999 | 0.9999 | > 0.9999 | 0.9996 | 0.9996 | 0.9998 | 0.9998 | 0.9994 |
| precision | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.87 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.97 |
| intraday coefficient of variation | 0.45 | 0.45 | 1.35 | 1.07 | 0.29 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.28 | 0.28 | 1.35 |
| interday coefficient of variation | 1.74 | 1.74 | 2.82 | 1.11 | 1.48 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.52 |
Notes: a a = acid, b = base, p = peroxide; b mean ± SD; Triplicate determinations of four samples.