Literature DB >> 28975663

Architectural patterns of p16 immunohistochemical expression associated with cancer immunity and prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Hyang Joo Ryu1, Eun Kyung Kim1, Su Jin Heo2, Byoung Chul Cho2, Hye Ryun Kim2, Sun Och Yoon1.   

Abstract

We evaluated the expression patterns of p16, which is used as a surrogate marker of HPV infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), in regard to their biological and prognostic implications. p16 expression patterns and infiltrated immune cells were analyzed through immunohistochemistry of p16, CD3, CD8, PD-1, FOXP3, and CD163 on surgically resected HNSCCs (n = 393). Patterns of p16 immunoexpression were defined as STRONG (strong, diffuse expression in cytoplasm, and nucleus in >70% of tumor cells), MARGINAL (expression restricted to tumor margins), MOSAIC (ragged, discontinued expression), NUCLEAR (expression in nuclei only), and ABSENT (no expression). The STRONG pattern was more frequent in the oropharynx, and the MARGINAL pattern was noted only in the oral cavity. MOSAIC and NUCLEAR patterns were noted at variable sites. No two patterns of p16 expression showed the same immune cell composition of CD3+ T cells, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, PD-1+ T cells, FOXP3+ regulatory T cells, and CD163+ macrophages. In overall and disease-free survival analyses, the STRONG pattern showed the most favorable prognosis, while the NUCLEAR pattern had the worst prognosis. HNSCC anatomical sites, tumor-related immune cell components, and patient outcomes were associated with p16 expression patterns. Each architectural pattern of p16 expression may be related to different biological and prognostic phenotypes.
© 2017 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Squamous cell carcinoma; cancer immunity; head and neck; human papilloma virus; p16; prognosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28975663     DOI: 10.1111/apm.12744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  5 in total

1.  Different patterns of p16INK4a immunohistochemical expression and their biological implications in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Camelia Sidonia Lazăr; Alina Simona Şovrea; Carmen Georgiu; Doiniţa Crişan; Ştefan Claudiu Mirescu; Marcel Cosgarea
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Association of p16 as Prognostic Factors for Oropharyngeal Cancer: Evaluation of p16 in 1470 Patients for a 16 Year Study in Northeast China.

Authors:  Hong-Xue Meng; Su-Sheng Miao; Kexin Chen; Hui-Ning Li; Guodong Yao; Jiashi Geng; Hongmei Wang; Qing-Tao Shi; Jing He; Xionghui Mao; Fang-Jia Tong; Lan-Lan Wei; Ji Sun; Dongfeng Tan; Qi You; Xiaomei Li; Jing-Shu Geng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Clinical relevance and significance of programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and p16 status in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Huatao Quan; Li Yan; Shuyi Wang; Shengzi Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  Identification of prognostic immune-related genes in rhabdoid tumor of kidney based on TARGET database analysis.

Authors:  Huimou Chen; Suying Lu; Jinqiu Guan; Xiaoqin Zhu; Feifei Sun; Junting Huang; Jia Zhu; Juan Wang; Zijun Zhen; Yi Que; Xiaofei Sun; Yizhuo Zhang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  NOVA1 induction by inflammation and NOVA1 suppression by epigenetic regulation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Kim; Yoon Ah Cho; Mi-Kyoung Seo; Hyunmi Ryu; Byoung Chul Cho; Yoon Woo Koh; Sun Och Yoon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.