Cynthia Yu-Wai-Man1, Aristides D Tagalakis2, Jinhong Meng2, Yann Bouremel1,3, Richard M H Lee1, Alex Virasami4, Stephen L Hart2, Peng T Khaw1. 1. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust and University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, England. 2. Experimental and Personalised Medicine Section, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, England. 3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, England. 4. Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, England.
Abstract
Importance: Postsurgical fibrosis is a critical determinant of the long-term success of glaucoma surgery, but no reliable biomarkers are currently available to stratify the risk of scarring. Objective: To compare the clinical phenotype of patients with conjunctival fibrosis after glaucoma surgery with candidate gene expression tissue biomarkers of fibrosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, 42 patients were recruited at the time of glaucoma surgery at the Moorfields Eye Hospital from September 1, 2014, to September 1, 2016. The participants were divided into those with fibrosis and those without fibrosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Genotype-phenotype correlations of the IL6 or PRG4 gene and detailed clinical phenotype. The IL6 and PRG4 protein expression in conjunctival tissues was also assessed using in situ immunohistochemical analysis. Central bleb area, maximal bleb area, and bleb height were graded on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 indicating 0%; 2, 25%; 3, 50%; 4, 75%; and 5, 100%). Bleb vascularity was graded on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 indicating avascularity; 2, normal; 3, mild; 4, moderate; and 5, severe hyperemia). Results: A total of 42 patients were recruited during the study period; 28 participants (67%) had previously undergone glaucoma surgery (fibrotic group) (mean [SD] age, 43.8 [3.6 years]; 16 [57%] female; 22 [79%] white), and 14 participants (33%) had not previously undergone glaucoma surgery (nonfibrotic group) (mean [SD] age, 47.7 [6.9] years; 4 [29%] female; 9 [64%] white). The fibrotic group had marked bleb scarring and vascularization and worse logMAR visual acuity. The mean (SD) grades were 1.4 (0.1) for central bleb area, 1.4 (0.1) for bleb height, and 3.4 (0.2) for bleb vascularity. The IL6 gene was upregulated in fibrotic cell lines (mean, 0.040) compared with nonfibrotic cell lines (mean, 0.011) (difference, 0.029; 95% CI, 0.015-0.043; P = .003). The PRG4 gene was also downregulated in fibrotic cell lines (0.002) compared with nonfibrotic cell lines (mean, 0.109; difference, 0.107; 95% CI, 0.104-0.110; P = .03). The study found a strong correlation between the IL6 gene and the number of glaucoma operations (r = 0.94, P < .001) and logMAR visual acuity (r = 0.64, P = .03). A moderate correlation was found between the PRG4 gene and the number of glaucoma operations (r = -0.72, P = .005) and logMAR visual acuity (r = -0.62, P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: IL6 and PRG4 represent potential novel tissue biomarkers of disease severity and prognosis in conjunctival fibrosis after glaucoma surgery. Future longitudinal studies with multiple postoperative measures are needed to validate the effect of these potential biomarkers of fibrosis.
Importance: Postsurgical fibrosis is a critical determinant of the long-term success of glaucoma surgery, but no reliable biomarkers are currently available to stratify the risk of scarring. Objective: To compare the clinical phenotype of patients with conjunctival fibrosis after glaucoma surgery with candidate gene expression tissue biomarkers of fibrosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, 42 patients were recruited at the time of glaucoma surgery at the Moorfields Eye Hospital from September 1, 2014, to September 1, 2016. The participants were divided into those with fibrosis and those without fibrosis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Genotype-phenotype correlations of the IL6 or PRG4 gene and detailed clinical phenotype. The IL6 and PRG4 protein expression in conjunctival tissues was also assessed using in situ immunohistochemical analysis. Central bleb area, maximal bleb area, and bleb height were graded on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 indicating 0%; 2, 25%; 3, 50%; 4, 75%; and 5, 100%). Bleb vascularity was graded on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 indicating avascularity; 2, normal; 3, mild; 4, moderate; and 5, severe hyperemia). Results: A total of 42 patients were recruited during the study period; 28 participants (67%) had previously undergone glaucoma surgery (fibrotic group) (mean [SD] age, 43.8 [3.6 years]; 16 [57%] female; 22 [79%] white), and 14 participants (33%) had not previously undergone glaucoma surgery (nonfibrotic group) (mean [SD] age, 47.7 [6.9] years; 4 [29%] female; 9 [64%] white). The fibrotic group had marked bleb scarring and vascularization and worse logMAR visual acuity. The mean (SD) grades were 1.4 (0.1) for central bleb area, 1.4 (0.1) for bleb height, and 3.4 (0.2) for bleb vascularity. The IL6 gene was upregulated in fibrotic cell lines (mean, 0.040) compared with nonfibrotic cell lines (mean, 0.011) (difference, 0.029; 95% CI, 0.015-0.043; P = .003). The PRG4 gene was also downregulated in fibrotic cell lines (0.002) compared with nonfibrotic cell lines (mean, 0.109; difference, 0.107; 95% CI, 0.104-0.110; P = .03). The study found a strong correlation between the IL6 gene and the number of glaucoma operations (r = 0.94, P < .001) and logMAR visual acuity (r = 0.64, P = .03). A moderate correlation was found between the PRG4 gene and the number of glaucoma operations (r = -0.72, P = .005) and logMAR visual acuity (r = -0.62, P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: IL6 and PRG4 represent potential novel tissue biomarkers of disease severity and prognosis in conjunctival fibrosis after glaucoma surgery. Future longitudinal studies with multiple postoperative measures are needed to validate the effect of these potential biomarkers of fibrosis.
Authors: Talmadge E King; Williamson Z Bradford; Socorro Castro-Bernardini; Elizabeth A Fagan; Ian Glaspole; Marilyn K Glassberg; Eduard Gorina; Peter M Hopkins; David Kardatzke; Lisa Lancaster; David J Lederer; Steven D Nathan; Carlos A Pereira; Steven A Sahn; Robert Sussman; Jeffrey J Swigris; Paul W Noble Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cynthia Yu-Wai-Man; Bradley Spencer-Dene; Richard M H Lee; Kim Hutchings; Erika M Lisabeth; Richard Treisman; Maryse Bailly; Scott D Larsen; Richard R Neubig; Peng T Khaw Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Latha Satish; William A LaFramboise; David B O'Gorman; Sandra Johnson; Benjamin Janto; Bing Siang Gan; Mark E Baratz; Fen Z Hu; J Christopher Post; Garth D Ehrlich; Sandeep Kathju Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Cyril Esnault; Aengus Stewart; Francesco Gualdrini; Phil East; Stuart Horswell; Nik Matthews; Richard Treisman Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Chrissy h Roberts; Christopher S Franklin; Pateh Makalo; Hassan Joof; Isatou Sarr; Olaimatu S Mahdi; Ansumana Sillah; Momodou Bah; Felicity Payne; Anna E Jeffreys; William Bottomley; Angels Natividad; Sandra Molina-Gonzalez; Sarah E Burr; Mark Preston; Dominic Kwiatkowski; Kirk A Rockett; Taane G Clark; Matthew J Burton; David C W Mabey; Robin Bailey; Inês Barroso; Martin J Holland Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Aristides D Tagalakis; Shivam Madaan; Scott D Larsen; Richard R Neubig; Peng T Khaw; Ian Rodrigues; Saurabh Goyal; Kin Sheng Lim; Cynthia Yu-Wai-Man Journal: J Nanobiotechnology Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 10.435