Mitra Shokri1, Reza Moradpour2, Majid Malekzade Shafaroudi1, Nourollah Rezaei1, Shervin Ziabakhsh Tabary3. 1. Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Cell and Molecoular Research Center (CMRC), Medical Faculty, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran. 2. Rouzbahan Institute of Higher Education, Sari, Iran. 3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Mazandaran Heart Center, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Integrity of the great saphenous vein (GSV) endothelium is the most important key element for long-term patency rate of grafts in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Storage solutions play an important role in maintaining viability of vein endothelium. Diminished nitric oxide (NO) because of endothelial dysfunction may facilitate vascular inflammation and formation of atherosclerotic plaque. AIM: So, we decided to find a reasonable alternative preservative solution instead of heparinized blood (HB) by measuring NO concentration with Griess assay. MATERIAL AND METHOD: SVG samples were obtained from 54 patients undergoing elective CABG. 3 mm rings were stored in solutions: heparinized blood (HB), Krebs (K), Krebs + Propranolol (K+P) 6.66 g/l, Krebs + Adrenaline (K+A) 200 µl/l, and Krebs + Verapamil (K+V) 200 µl/l for 30, 45, 60 and 90 min. Nitrite concentration was measured by Griess assay at 540 nm. H&E staining was performed for histologic test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (V16). Results were expressed as (Means ± SE) followed by One-Way ANOVA for finding best preservative solution. Repeated measurement test was used to investigate best time. In all analysis, (P<0.05) was considered significant. RESULTS: Average concentration of NO in (K+V) compare with HB (1st control), K (2nd control), (K+A) and (K+P) showed higher rate in all times from 30 to 90 min (16.55±1.85:) and in (K+A, K+P) compare with (HB) and (K) there was no statistically significant difference in the same times. Comparing the average concentration of (NO) between (HB) and (K) showed no significant difference (K+V>HB=K=K+A=K+P). Also, our investigations showed that NO concentration in (K+V) has the highest rate in time 90 min (10.07±0.56, p=0.002):. More than 50 percent of endothelial cells stay normal in (K+V) compare with other solutions. CONCLUSION: It seems that (K+V) is the best solution for the maintenance of normal physiology of SVGs endothelial cells. The most appropriate SVGs endothelial function is within 90 minutes after harvesting.
INTRODUCTION: Integrity of the great saphenous vein (GSV) endothelium is the most important key element for long-term patency rate of grafts in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Storage solutions play an important role in maintaining viability of vein endothelium. Diminished nitric oxide (NO) because of endothelial dysfunction may facilitate vascular inflammation and formation of atherosclerotic plaque. AIM: So, we decided to find a reasonable alternative preservative solution instead of heparinized blood (HB) by measuring NO concentration with Griess assay. MATERIAL AND METHOD:SVG samples were obtained from 54 patients undergoing elective CABG. 3 mm rings were stored in solutions: heparinized blood (HB), Krebs (K), Krebs + Propranolol (K+P) 6.66 g/l, Krebs + Adrenaline (K+A) 200 µl/l, and Krebs + Verapamil (K+V) 200 µl/l for 30, 45, 60 and 90 min. Nitrite concentration was measured by Griess assay at 540 nm. H&E staining was performed for histologic test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (V16). Results were expressed as (Means ± SE) followed by One-Way ANOVA for finding best preservative solution. Repeated measurement test was used to investigate best time. In all analysis, (P<0.05) was considered significant. RESULTS: Average concentration of NO in (K+V) compare with HB (1st control), K (2nd control), (K+A) and (K+P) showed higher rate in all times from 30 to 90 min (16.55±1.85:) and in (K+A, K+P) compare with (HB) and (K) there was no statistically significant difference in the same times. Comparing the average concentration of (NO) between (HB) and (K) showed no significant difference (K+V>HB=K=K+A=K+P). Also, our investigations showed that NO concentration in (K+V) has the highest rate in time 90 min (10.07±0.56, p=0.002):. More than 50 percent of endothelial cells stay normal in (K+V) compare with other solutions. CONCLUSION: It seems that (K+V) is the best solution for the maintenance of normal physiology of SVGs endothelial cells. The most appropriate SVGs endothelial function is within 90 minutes after harvesting.
Atherosclerosis is the main cause of coronary artery disease (CAD) (1). This disease affects millions of people around the world (2) and causes thousands of deaths yearly because obstructed vessels cannot supply blood flow to the myocardial tissue (3, 4). more than 30% of deaths annually allocated to Cardiovascular diseases (5). Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) that was developed in the 1960s and 1970s, is the most common procedure in cardiovascular operations and is used for the revascularization of obstructed coronary arteries to relieve ischemia resistant to medical treatment, prevent myocardial infarction and also to increase a productive life span (6). Autologous saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) are routinely used in this surgery and other vascular reconstructive procedures (7). Patency rates of these grafts are low, because of surgical manipulation, uncontrolled hydrostatic distension during SVG harvesting and inappropriate preservation solutions that are used for preserving them during surgery in order to maintain their viability prior to anastomosis (8). These cause considerable damage not only to the endothelium, but also to the media and adventitia. Ten year patency rate for them is reported to be 61% to 65% (9). 20 years after CABG, only 25% of SVGs provide sufficient blood flow (10, 11). Intact vascular endothelium plays an essential role in the regulation of vascular tone and contributing to maintain the balance between vasodilatation – vasoconstriction (12) by endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF) production, that is identified as nitric oxide (NO) (13) and is important for inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation (14), adhesion of platelets (15) and leukocytes to the endothelium (16). Intact endothelium serves as an electrical, mechanical and physiological barrier between flowing blood and the sub-endothelium (17). Disruption of endothelial cells results in oxidation of lipoproteins, extracellular matrix deposition, accumulation of lipid-rich material, platelet activation, medial smooth muscle cell proliferation (18, 19). All of these consequences of endothelial dysfunction may contribute to thrombus formation, developing the expression of atherosclerosis and early SVG occlusion (20). The consequence is a non-patent SVG that is the major cause of recurrent angina after CABG (21). Decreased NO production is closely associated with endothelial dysfunction (22). Measurement of (NO) in biological fluids is hard because of its low physiological concentration (1nM) and its short half-life of 2–30 s (22). So, it’s stable metabolites nitrite and nitrate will be used for measuring(1) because it reacts rapidly with molecular oxygen and form nitrite (22, 23).Aim of this study was to compare the protective effects of different storing solutions (Krebs, Krebs plus Adrenaline, Krebs plus Propranolol, Krebs plus Verapamil) on the endothelium of saphenous vein grafts with heparinized blood (HB) that is typically used for preserving grafts during CABG in heart surgery operation rooms by measuring NO concentration that was released from the endothelium in these solutions.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
Total amount of 54 patients who underwent elective CABG surgery in Mazandaran Heart Center, Sari, Iran from January 2014 to September 2016 were included in the study. Greater saphenous veins were obtained from classic incision in their legs then vessels cut into 3 mm rings and stored in preserving solutions (23). There were 4 different solutions: Heparinized blood (HB: first control group), Krebs (K: second control group), Krebs plus Propranolol (K+P), Krebs plus Adrenaline (K+A), and Krebs plus Verapamil (K+V) at a rate of 5 ml (volume: 5 ml) for 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes after harvesting. All solutions continuously perfused with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 at a constant rate of 5 mL/min and maintained at (37 ° C). The composition of Krebs’ solution was :NaCl (6.95 g), KCl (0.19 g), NaH2PO4 (0.14 g), CaCl2·2H2O (0.37 g), MgCl2·6H2O (0.26 g), D-glucose (1.98 g) in one ml distilled water. plus Adrenalin, 200 µl/l Krebs solution (26). Krebs plus Propranolol (6.66 g) in 1 litter Krebs solution (27). KrebsKrebs plus Verapamil 200 µl/l Krebs solution (23).Turbidity caused by interference of protein with NO, deproteinization of plasma samples should be performed (23, 24). Plasma samples were diluted fourfold with distilled water and then 1/20th volume of zinc sulfate (300 g/l) should be added. This solution should be centrifuged at 10000 g for 5 min (24). nitrite concentration is typically measured by colorimetric Griess assay in biologic samples Because of its simplicity (24). In this method, nitrite is first treated with sulfanilamide (SA), so in acidic media a transient diazonium salt will form. This intermediate is then reacts with N-naphthylethylenediamine dehydrochloride (NED), to form a stable azo compound. The intense purple color of the product allows nitrite assay with high sensitivity and can be used to measure nitrite concentration as low as ~0.5 mM level. The absorbance of this adduct at 540 nm is linearly proportional to the nitrite concentration in the sample. This approach is adopted in most commercial kits.Histology and staining: All samples should be stored 24 hours in formalin 10% immediately after exiting out of solutions of 30 to 90. One 3 mm ring of vessel was stored in formalin 10% immediately after harvesting as control group. Then paraffin embedded samples were sectioned at 5 µ by a microtome (Leica/ USA). H&E staining was performed. Histologically endothelial viability was classified into three categories: normal endothelium (Grade1), normal endothelium more than 50% (Grade2) and normal endothelium less than 50% (Grade3).Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 16. Results were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean followed by One-Way ANOVA. Post hoc analysis was performed by the Tukey test for finding best solution for preserving vessels. Repeated measurement test was used to investigate best time. In all analysis, (P<0.05) was considered significant.
3. RESULTS
Best preserving solution: Average concentration of NO in (K+V) compare with HB (1st control) and K (2nd control) showed higher rate in all times from 30 to 90 min (16.55±1.85). Comparing the average concentration of nitric oxide between the first and second control group showed no significant difference. Also, our investigations showed that NO concentration in Krebs plus Verapamil has the highest rate in time 90 min (Figure 1 and Table 1). Average concentration of NO in (K+A) and (K+P) compare with HB (1st control) and K (2nd control) did not show a statistically significant difference in all times from 30 to 90 min. Comparing the average concentration of nitric oxide between (K+A) and (K+P) with (K+V) showed significant difference in all times from 30 to 90 min (16.55±1.85). Again (K+V) had the highest rate of NO concentration compare with (K+A) and (K+P) (Figure 2 and Table 2).
Figure 1
NO concentration in (K+V) compare with (a= HB) and (b= K) in 1: 30 min, 2: 45 min, 3: 60 min, 4: 90 min. (P= 0.01 – 0.05 *, P= 0.001-0.009 **, P= 0.0001***).
Table 1
Mean of NO concentration after storing saphenous vein 3 mm rings in time 30, 45, 60 and 90 min. All data mentioned based on (Mean±SE). K+V: Krebs plus Verapamil, HB: Heparinized blood, K: Krebs.
Figure 2
NO concentration in (K+V) compare with (a= K+A) and (b= K+P) in 1: 30 min, 2: 45 min, 3: 60 min, 4: 90 min. (P= 0.01 – 0.05 *, P= 0.001-0.009 **, P= 0.0001***).
Table 2
Mean of NO concentration after storing saphenous vein 3 mm rings in time 30, 45, 60 and 90 min. All data mentioned based on (Mean±SE).. K+V: Krebs plus Verapamil, K+A: Krebs plus Adrenaline, K+P: Krebs plus propranolol.
NO concentration in (K+V) compare with (a= HB) and (b= K) in 1: 30 min, 2: 45 min, 3: 60 min, 4: 90 min. (P= 0.01 – 0.05 *, P= 0.001-0.009 **, P= 0.0001***).Mean of NO concentration after storing saphenous vein 3 mm rings in time 30, 45, 60 and 90 min. All data mentioned based on (Mean±SE). K+V: Krebs plus Verapamil, HB: Heparinized blood, K: Krebs.NO concentration in (K+V) compare with (a= K+A) and (b= K+P) in 1: 30 min, 2: 45 min, 3: 60 min, 4: 90 min. (P= 0.01 – 0.05 *, P= 0.001-0.009 **, P= 0.0001***).Mean of NO concentration after storing saphenous vein 3 mm rings in time 30, 45, 60 and 90 min. All data mentioned based on (Mean±SE).. K+V: Krebs plus Verapamil, K+A: Krebs plus Adrenaline, K+P: Krebs plus propranolol.(K+V>HB=K=K+A=K+P).Best time: Our investigations showed that the best time for storing human saphenous veins in (K+V) preserving solution is for 90 minutes because mean of this time has higher rate compare with other 30, 45 and 60 min (10.07±0.56, p=0.002) (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Comparing the average duration of human saphenous veins stored in solution
Comparing the average duration of human saphenous veins stored in solutionHistologic study: Based on histologic study using light microscopy to count and determinate percentage of normal endothelial cells in different groups of storing solutions we obtained that more than 50 percent of endothelial cells stay normal in Krebs plus Verapamil compare with other solutions (Figure 4). Normal endothelial cells have Squamous, polygonal and stretched shape that we observed these cells in (CO) and (K+V) group. In (HB), (K), (K+A) and (K+P) groups we observed endothelial cells that were separated in some places and in some other areas were completely detached (photomicrograph 1).
Figure 4
percentage of normal endothelial cells of saphenous vein samples
percentage of normal endothelial cells of saphenous vein samplesPhotomicrograph 1 (X400): yellow arrows show endothelium of saphenous vein samples. (e: endothelium, CO: control, K+V: Krebs plus Verapamil, K+A: Krebs plus Adrenalin, K+P: Krebs plus Propranolol).
4. DISCUSSION
Operative results significantly early re-obstruction of SVGs after CABG closely depend on preserving solutions that are used for storing these grafts. For saphenous vein grafts, protecting endothelium is vitally important. Vascular endothelium derives a number of (EDRFs) that play an important role in vaso-relaxation and in inhibition of platelet aggregation. When endothelium is impaired, the antiplatelet function of EDRFs (such as nitric oxide and prostaglandin I2) is lost and platelets attach to the areas that endothelial cells were denuded. The coagulation cascade is activated by aggregating platelets and by thrombin. Thrombus then forms. This becomes the basis for later growth and development of atherosclerotic plaque and may lead to graft occlusion (24, 25). There are various types of solution used for storing conduits before anastomosis (25). Verapamil is a Ca2+ channel blocker and is highly prescribed as an anti-anginal, antiarrhythmic and antihypertensive drug (25). In our study, 4 different solutions were used for preserving 3 mm rings of saphenous veins compare with autologous heparinized whole blood as normal storage solution in operation rooms. We investigated that endothelial cells are better preserved in non-blood storage solutions. When saphenous veins were stored in oxygenated Krebs plus Verapamil solution at room temperature, we observed highest mean of nitric oxide concentration. So, the surgeon should be alert to this in the intraoperative and perioperative management of patients undergoing bypass surgery. Guo-Wei He showed that using verapamil + nitroglycerin solution for preparing radial artery can maximally preserves endothelial function in contrast to papaverine. verapamil + nitroglycerin solution may be effectively and safely used to prepare the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting(25,26). P. DI. NAPOLI and college evidenced that verapamil treatment may reduce endothelial dysfunction. Verapamil is also effective in protecting the integrity of cellular and membrane structures as evidenced by a reduction of CK release in heart attack (26). These two findings were agreed with our investigations and this may be because of protecting effect of verapamil on the integrity of endothelial cells. Grafts are commonly stored for 45 minutes or more. This can disrupt the integrity of the vascular endothelium in saphenous vein grafts (27). Our study has demonstrated that a storage duration of 30, 45, 60 and 90 minutes in the 4 tested storage solutions has significantly affect the viability of endothelium of vessels, as indicated by (NO) concentration compared with control rings in heparinized blood solution. However, storing rings of vessels for 90 min in (K+V) showed the highest concentration of (NO). It reveals that this time is the best time for preserving saphenous veins.
5. CONCLUSION
Protective effect of (K+V) solution on saphenous vein endothelial cells is more than (HB) solution which is the most common preserving solution that is used in cardiovascular operation rooms, and (K). So, we recommend to use (Krebs plus Verapamil) solution instead of Heparinized blood in order to protect the integrity of cellular and membrane structures of saphenous vein more efficiently. Besides, the most appropriate time for using SVG in CABG is 90 minutes after harvesting.
Authors: Steven Goldman; Gulshan K Sethi; William Holman; Hoang Thai; Edward McFalls; Herbert B Ward; Rosemary F Kelly; Birger Rhenman; Gareth H Tobler; Faisal G Bakaeen; Joseph Huh; Ernesto Soltero; Mohammed Moursi; Miguel Haime; Michael Crittenden; Vigneshwar Kasirajan; Michelle Ratliff; Stewart Pett; Anand Irimpen; William Gunnar; Donald Thomas; Stephen Fremes; Thomas Moritz; Domenic Reda; Lynn Harrison; Todd H Wagner; Yajie Wang; Lori Planting; Meredith Miller; Yvette Rodriguez; Elizabeth Juneman; Douglass Morrison; Mary Kaye Pierce; Sandra Kreamer; Mei-Chiung Shih; Kelvin Lee Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M Moussa; O Banakh; B Wehrle-Haller; P Fontana; S Scherrer; M Cattani; A Wiskott; S Durual Journal: Biomed Mater Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 3.715
Authors: Cloe Luckett Gray; Desiree L Krebs-Kraft; Matia B Solomon; Alisa Norvelle; Marise B Parent; Kim L Huhman Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2015-09-11
Authors: Alanna M Chamberlain; Alvaro Alonso; Bernard J Gersh; Sheila M Manemann; Jill M Killian; Susan A Weston; Margaret Byrne; Véronique L Roger Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 4.749