| Literature DB >> 28974681 |
Jiamiao Yang1,2, Lei Gong2,3, Xiao Xu2, Pengfei Hai1,2, Yuecheng Shen1,2, Yuta Suzuki2, Lihong V Wang4.
Abstract
Photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) is uniquely positioned for biomedical applications because of its ability to visualize optical absorption contrast in vivo in three dimensions. Here we propose motionless volumetric spatially invariant resolution photoacoustic microscopy (SIR-PAM). To realize motionless volumetric imaging,Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28974681 PMCID: PMC5626698 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00856-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Principle of motionless SIR-PAM. a Principle of spatially invariant resolution photoacoustic microscopy (SIR-PAM). To achieve spatially invariant resolution volumetric imaging, SIR-PAM uses PISFs to stimulate PA signals within an object and extract its Fourier spectra, and uses an ultrasonic transducer to resolve the depth of the PA signals. b Principle of conventional PAM. A focused Gaussian beam is utilized in conventional PAM to stimulate PA signals, restricting its DOF. Besides, conventional PAM uses raster scanning to realize volumetric imaging. An object with uniformly distributed microparticles was simulated to compare the image qualities of two methods. c PSFs of SIR-PAM (red curve) and conventional PAM (blue curve), which indicate that SIR-PAM achieves 1.5 times finer lateral resolution than conventional PAM. Scale bars, 100 µm
Fig. 2Experimental set-up and characterization of SIR-PAM system. a Schematic illustration of the SIR-PAM system. DAQ data acquisition system; DMD digital micromirror device; T1 DMD trigger; T2 pulsed laser trigger; T3 DAQ trigger. b Normalized (Norm.) edge spread functions of conventional PAM and SIR-PAM, measured at the focal plane using a sharp edge made of deposited chromium. The corresponding line spread functions were fitted to compute the lateral resolutions defined by the full-width at half-maximum (inset). c Theoretical and experimental lateral resolutions of the two PAM systems versus depth. DOF depth of field; RIAR resolution-invariant axial range
Fig. 3SIR-PAM imaging of a USAF resolution target with spatially invariant resolution and improved lateral resolution. Images of a resolution target (1951 USAF) acquired with SIR-PAM a and conventional PAM b at the focal plane, respectively. c Images of groups 8 and 9 acquired by SIR-PAM at different imaging depths. The focal plane is located at z = 0.0 mm. d Images of groups 6 and 7 acquired by conventional PAM at depths corresponding to c. The results show that SIR-PAM is capable of achieving spatially invariant resolution and improved lateral resolution
Fig. 4Volumetric imaging of spatially distributed carbon fibers. a Volume-rendered image of a 3D object reconstructed by SIR-PAM, showing spatially invariant resolution. b Image of the same region as in a obtained by conventional PAM with decreasing lateral resolution away from the focal plane. Three pairs of en face image slices were taken at imaging depths of –0.7, 0.0, and 0.8 mm. The focal plane is located at z = 0.0 mm. c−e Corresponding line profiles across the carbon fibers shown to compare the imaging quality of the two systems. Scale bars, 150 µm
Fig. 5SIR-PAM imaging of zebrafish embryos in vivo. a, b Depth-encoded whole-body images of a zebrafish larva obtained by SIR-PAM a and conventional PAM b. The focal plane is located at z = 0.0 mm. c−e Normalized PA amplitude profiles along the dashed lines. Finer structures can be resolved by SIR-PAM due to its improved lateral resolution within a large RIAR. Scale bars, 200 µm