Literature DB >> 28974567

Relative and Combined Prognostic Importance of On-Treatment Mean and Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability in ONTARGET and TRANSCEND Patients.

Giuseppe Mancia1, Helmut Schumacher2, Michael Böhm2, Josep Redon2, Roland E Schmieder2, Paolo Verdecchia2, Peter Sleight2, Koon Teo2, Salim Yusuf2.   

Abstract

In 28 790 patients recruited for the ONTARGET (Ongoing Treatment Alone and in Combination With Ramipril Global End Point Trials) and TRANSCEND (Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects With Cardiovascular Disease) trials, we investigated the prognostic value for cardiovascular events (primary outcome) of (1)on-treatment visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure (SBP) variability versus mean SBP and (2) the 2 measures together. SBP variability was measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) of mean SBP to which it was unrelated. Confounders such as variable time and number of visits from which to calculate SBP-CV were avoided by using the same number of visits at identical times in all patients. The covariate-adjusted risk of the primary outcome (Cox models) increased as SBP-CV or mean on-treatment quintile SBP increased, but only for mean on-treatment SBP, the relationship achieved statistical significance: global test for trend, P=0.12 versus P<0.0001. SBP-CV showed a relationship with fatal events, but it was unrelated to the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, which were predicted by on-treatment mean SBP. Prediction of the primary outcome improved by the combined use of both measures: global test for trend, P<0.0001; hazard ratio for combined fifth versus first quintile, 1.42 (1.20-1.68) compared with 1.13 (1.01-1.27) for SBP-CV and 1.24 (1.11-1.40) for mean SBP. Thus, in the present study, on-treatment mean SBP provided an overall better prediction of cardiovascular risk than visit-to-visit SBP-CV. Prediction improved by their combined use, which may thus offer a more precise estimate of the protective effect of treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http//www.clinicaltrial.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00153101
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antihypertensive treatment; blood pressure variability; cardiovascular disease; cardiovascular prevention; hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28974567     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  3 in total

1.  Prognostic importance of long-term SBP variability in high-risk hypertension.

Authors:  Rita Del Pinto; Davide Pietropaoli; Mirela Dobre; Claudio Ferri
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.776

2.  A Molecular Docking Approach to Evaluate the Pharmacological Properties of Natural and Synthetic Treatment Candidates for Use against Hypertension.

Authors:  Syed Awais Attique; Muhammad Hassan; Muhammad Usman; Rana Muhammad Atif; Shahid Mahboob; Khalid A Al-Ghanim; Muhammad Bilal; Muhammad Zohaib Nawaz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Midlife Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events During Extended Follow-up.

Authors:  Adam de Havenon; Alen Delic; Shadi Yaghi; Ka-Ho Wong; Jennifer J Majersik; Eric Stulberg; David Tirschwell; Mohammad Anadani
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.080

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.