M G Caris1, H A Labuschagne2, M Dekker3, M H H Kramer2, M A van Agtmael2, C M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls3. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Microbiology & Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.caris@vumc.nl. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Medical Microbiology & Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is paramount to prevent healthcare-associated infections, but improving compliance is challenging. When healthcare workers seldom encounter healthcare-associated infections, they will consider the odds of causing infections through poor hand hygiene negligible. Cognitive biases such as these may induce non-compliance. Nudging, 'a friendly push to encourage desired behaviour', could provide an easily implemented, inexpensive measure to address cognitive biases and thus support hand hygiene interventions. AIM: To investigate whether behavioural nudges, displayed as posters, can increase the use of alcohol-based hand rub. METHODS: We developed nudges based on a systematic review of previously described cognitive biases, and tested these through a cross-sectional survey among the target audience. We then conducted a controlled before-after trial on two hospital wards, to assess the effect of these nudges on the use of alcohol-based hand rub, measured with electronic dispensers. FINDINGS: Poisson regression analyses adjusted for workload showed that nudges displayed next to dispensers increased their overall use on one ward [poster 1: relative risk: 1.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.2); poster 2: 1.7 (1.2-2.5)] and during doctor's rounds on both wards [poster 1: ward A: 1.7 (1.1-2.6); ward B: 2.2 (1.3-3.8)]. Use of dispensers without adjacent nudges did not increase. CONCLUSION: Nudges based on cognitive biases that play a role in hand hygiene, and displayed as posters, could provide an easy, inexpensive measure to increase use of alcohol-based hand rub. When applying nudges to change behaviour, it is important to identify the right nudge for the right audience.
BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene is paramount to prevent healthcare-associated infections, but improving compliance is challenging. When healthcare workers seldom encounter healthcare-associated infections, they will consider the odds of causing infections through poor hand hygiene negligible. Cognitive biases such as these may induce non-compliance. Nudging, 'a friendly push to encourage desired behaviour', could provide an easily implemented, inexpensive measure to address cognitive biases and thus support hand hygiene interventions. AIM: To investigate whether behavioural nudges, displayed as posters, can increase the use of alcohol-based hand rub. METHODS: We developed nudges based on a systematic review of previously described cognitive biases, and tested these through a cross-sectional survey among the target audience. We then conducted a controlled before-after trial on two hospital wards, to assess the effect of these nudges on the use of alcohol-based hand rub, measured with electronic dispensers. FINDINGS: Poisson regression analyses adjusted for workload showed that nudges displayed next to dispensers increased their overall use on one ward [poster 1: relative risk: 1.6 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-2.2); poster 2: 1.7 (1.2-2.5)] and during doctor's rounds on both wards [poster 1: ward A: 1.7 (1.1-2.6); ward B: 2.2 (1.3-3.8)]. Use of dispensers without adjacent nudges did not increase. CONCLUSION: Nudges based on cognitive biases that play a role in hand hygiene, and displayed as posters, could provide an easy, inexpensive measure to increase use of alcohol-based hand rub. When applying nudges to change behaviour, it is important to identify the right nudge for the right audience.
Authors: Jessica R Howard-Anderson; Mary Elizabeth Sexton; Chad Robichaux; Zanthia Wiley; Jay B Varkey; Sujit Suchindran; Benjamin Albrecht; K Ashley Jones; Scott K Fridkin; Jesse T Jacob Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Mark W Vander Weg; Eli N Perencevich; Amy M J O'Shea; Michael P Jones; Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin; Carrie L Franciscus; Cassie Cunningham Goedken; Gio J Baracco; Suzanne F Bradley; Jose Cadena; Graeme N Forrest; Kalpana Gupta; Daniel J Morgan; Michael A Rubin; Joseph Thurn; Marvin J Bittner; Heather Schacht Reisinger Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-10-02
Authors: Anne-Mette Iversen; Marie Stangerup; Michelle From-Hansen; Rosa Hansen; Louise Palasin Sode; Krassimir Kostadinov; Marco Bo Hansen; Henrik Calum; Svend Ellermann-Eriksen; Jenny Dahl Knudsen Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Briana S Last; Simone H Schriger; Carter E Timon; Hannah E Frank; Alison M Buttenheim; Brittany N Rudd; Sara Fernandez-Marcote; Carrie Comeau; Sosunmolu Shoyinka; Rinad S Beidas Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2021-01-11