Literature DB >> 28974291

Pain During Venous Cannulation.

Dirk Rüsch1, Tilo Koch, Markus Spies, Leopold Hj Eberhart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pain of venous puncture for the cannulation of peripheral veins is disturbing to many patients. This is the first clinical trial of the efficacy of local anesthesia in comparison to placebo (no pretreatment) in a control group, as a function of the size of the cannula.
METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial of fully factorial design was performed to study pain during venipuncture after local anesthesia either with intra - dermally injected lidocaine or with a vapocoolant spray, in comparison to placebo. A standardized protocol was used for structured communication with the patient to provide the greatest feasible degree of patient blinding (trial registration number DRKS00010155). The primary endpoints were the subjective discomfort of the patient during preparation and puncture of a vein of the dorsum of the hand, assessed on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (unbearable discomfort), and the rate of unsuccessful puncture.
RESULTS: The intention-to-treat analysis of all 450 patients revealed that the reported degree of pain during venipuncture depended to a large extent on the caliber of the chosen venous cannula. For a 17-gauge (17G) cannula, both the vapocoolant spray (NRS = 2.6 ± 1.3) and lidocaine (NRS = 3.5 ± 2.2) lessened the discomfort due to venipuncture compared to control treatment (5.0 ± 1.5). The effect of vapocoolant spray compared to the control was both clinically relevant and statistically significant (p < 0.0001). When a smaller 20G cannula was used, however, vapocoolant spray improved discomfort by only 0.8 NRS points, which, though still statistically significant (p = 0.0056), was no longer clinically relevant. The rate of unsuccessful puncture was higher after lidocaine pretreatment (12.7%) than after either vapocoolant spray (4.7%; p = 0.0066) or no pretreatment (4.0%; p = 0.0014).
CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia can be recommended before venipuncture only if a large cannula is used (e.g., ≥ 17G). Vapocoolant spray may be at least as useful as lidocaine injection; it prevents pain to a similar extent and is associated with a lower rate of unsuccessful puncture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28974291      PMCID: PMC5629277          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  26 in total

1.  Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale.

Authors:  E J Gallagher; M Liebman; P E Bijur
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  The use of pre-cannulation local anaesthetic and factors affecting pain perception in the emergency department setting.

Authors:  T Harris; P A Cameron; A Ugoni
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative study of topical skin analgesics and the anxiety and discomfort associated with venous cannulation.

Authors:  A F Speirs; K H Taylor; D N Joanes; N M Girdler
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2001-04-28       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Local anaesthetic: does it really reduce the pain of insertion of all sizes of venous cannula?

Authors:  B T Langham; D A Harrison
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Comparison of topical anaesthesia methods for venous cannulation in adults.

Authors:  P Biro; T Meier; A S Cummins
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 6.  Preoperative risk assessment--from routine tests to individualized investigation.

Authors:  Andreas B Böhmer; Frank Wappler; Bernd Zwissler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Vapocoolant spray vs subcutaneous lidocaine injection for reducing the pain of intravenous cannulation: a randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Authors:  D E Page; D McD Taylor
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Ethyl vinyl chloride vapocoolant spray fails to decrease pain associated with intravenous cannulation in children.

Authors:  Mary Costello; Maria Ramundo; Norman C Christopher; Keith R Powell
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.168

9.  The effect of vapocoolant spray on pain due to intravenous cannulation in children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ken J Farion; Karen L Splinter; Kym Newhook; Isabelle Gaboury; William M Splinter
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  The perioperative management of treatment with anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors.

Authors:  Axel Schlitt; Csilla Jámbor; Michael Spannagl; Wiebke Gogarten; Tom Schilling; Bernhard Zwissler
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 5.594

View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of vein-viewing device to assist intravenous cannulation decreases the time and number of attempts for successful cannulation in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Alka Sara Saju; Lilly Prasad; Menaka Reghuraman; Immanuel Karl Sampath
Journal:  Paediatr Neonatal Pain       Date:  2019-10-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.