Literature DB >> 28973688

From Classical Toxicology to Tox21: Some Critical Conceptual and Technological Advances in the Molecular Understanding of the Toxic Response Beginning From the Last Quarter of the 20th Century.

Supratim Choudhuri1, Geoffrey W Patton2, Ronald F Chanderbhan1, Antonia Mattia1, Curtis D Klaassen2.   

Abstract

Toxicology has made steady advances over the last 60+ years in understanding the mechanisms of toxicity at an increasingly finer level of cellular organization. Traditionally, toxicological studies have used animal models. However, the general adoption of the principles of 3R (Replace, Reduce, Refine) provided the impetus for the development of in vitro models in toxicity testing. The present commentary is an attempt to briefly discuss the transformation in toxicology that began around 1980. Many genes important in cellular protection and metabolism of toxicants were cloned and characterized in the 80s, and gene expression studies became feasible, too. The development of transgenic and knockout mice provided valuable animal models to investigate the role of specific genes in producing toxic effects of chemicals or protecting the organism from the toxic effects of chemicals. Further developments in toxicology came from the incorporation of the tools of "omics" (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, interactomics), epigenetics, systems biology, computational biology, and in vitro biology. Collectively, the advances in toxicology made during the last 30-40 years are expected to provide more innovative and efficient approaches to risk assessment. A goal of experimental toxicology going forward is to reduce animal use and yet be able to conduct appropriate risk assessments and make sound regulatory decisions using alternative methods of toxicity testing. In that respect, Tox21 has provided a big picture framework for the future. Currently, regulatory decisions involving drugs, biologics, food additives, and similar compounds still utilize data from animal testing and human clinical trials. In contrast, the prioritization of environmental chemicals for further study can be made using in vitro screening and computational tools. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology 2017. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tox21; adverse outcome pathway; in vitro; nuclear receptors; toxicology; transcription factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28973688      PMCID: PMC5837539          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  119 in total

Review 1.  Translation of pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics: a regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence J Lesko; Janet Woodcock
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Predicting drug metabolism: experiment and/or computation?

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Andreas H Göller; Dieter Lang; Jens Kunze; Bernard Testa; Ian D Wilson; Robert C Glen; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Acetaminophen-induced hepatic necrosis. V. Correlation of hepatic necrosis, covalent binding and glutathione depletion in hamsters.

Authors:  W Z Potter; S S Thorgeirsson; D J Jollow; J R Mitchell
Journal:  Pharmacology       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 2.547

6.  Aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction by polycyclic hydrocarbons: simple autosomal dominant trait in the mouse.

Authors:  D W Nebert; F M Goujon; J E Gielen
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1972-03-29

Review 7.  The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: A Key Bridging Molecule of External and Internal Chemical Signals.

Authors:  Jijing Tian; Yu Feng; Hualing Fu; Heidi Qunhui Xie; Joy Xiaosong Jiang; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 8.  An overview of transcriptional regulation in response to toxicological insult.

Authors:  Paul Jennings; Alice Limonciel; Luca Felice; Martin O Leonard
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Adverse Outcome Pathways can drive non-animal approaches for safety assessment.

Authors:  Natalie Burden; Fiona Sewell; Melvin E Andersen; Alan Boobis; J Kevin Chipman; Mark T D Cronin; Thomas H Hutchinson; Ian Kimber; Maurice Whelan
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 10.  Three-dimensional cell culture: a breakthrough in vivo.

Authors:  Delphine Antoni; Hélène Burckel; Elodie Josset; Georges Noel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Drug-Induced Rhabdomyolysis Atlas (DIRA) for idiosyncratic adverse drug reaction management.

Authors:  Zhining Wen; Yu Liang; Yingyi Hao; Brian Delavan; Ruili Huang; Mike Mikailov; Weida Tong; Menglong Li; Zhichao Liu
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  Historical exposure to chemicals reduces tolerance to novel chemical stress in Daphnia (waterflea).

Authors:  Muhammad Abdullahi; Jiarui Zhou; Vignesh Dandhapani; Anurag Chaturvedi; Luisa Orsini
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.622

3.  Integrated Genotoxicity Testing of three anti-infective drugs using the TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker and high-throughput CometChip® assay in TK6 cells.

Authors:  Julie K Buick; Andrea Rowan-Carroll; Rémi Gagné; Andrew Williams; Renxiang Chen; Heng-Hong Li; Albert J Fornace; Christy Chao; Bevin P Engelward; Roland Frötschl; Heidrun Ellinger-Ziegelbauer; Syril D Pettit; Jiri Aubrecht; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-23

Review 4.  Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Foods: Biological Effects, Legislation, Occurrence, Analytical Methods, and Strategies to Reduce Their Formation.

Authors:  Geni Rodrigues Sampaio; Glória Maria Guizellini; Simone Alves da Silva; Adriana Palma de Almeida; Ana Clara C Pinaffi-Langley; Marcelo Macedo Rogero; Adriano Costa de Camargo; Elizabeth A F S Torres
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Flow cytometric micronucleus assay and TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker analysis of ten genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals in human HepaRG™ cells.

Authors:  Julie K Buick; Andrew Williams; Rémi Gagné; Carol D Swartz; Leslie Recio; Stephen S Ferguson; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2020-02-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.