Importance: Use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis is growing rapidly. However, to our knowledge, the durability of these prostheses is incompletely defined. Objective: To determine the midterm hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this study, we analyzed core laboratory-generated data from echocardiograms of all patients enrolled in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 1 Trial with successful TAVR or surgical AVR (SAVR) obtained preimplantation and at 7 days, 1 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postimplantation. Patients from continued access observational studies were included for comparison. Interventions: Successful implantation after randomization to TAVR vs SAVR (PARTNER 1A; TAVR, n = 321; SAVR, n = 313), TAVR vs medical treatment (PARTNER 1B; TAVR, n = 165), and continued access (TAVR, n = 1996). Five-year echocardiogram data were available for 424 patients after TAVR and 49 after SAVR. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death or reintervention for aortic valve structural indications, measured using aortic valvemean gradient, effective orifice area, Doppler velocity index, and evidence of hemodynamic deterioration by reintervention, adverse hemodynamics, or transvalvular regurgitation. Results: Of 2795 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 84.5 (7.1) years, and 1313 (47.0%) were female. Population hemodynamic trends derived from nonlinear mixed-effects models showed small early favorable changes in the first few months post-TAVR, with a decrease of -2.9 mm Hg in aortic valve mean gradient, an increase of 0.028 in Doppler velocity index, and an increase of 0.09 cm2 in effective orifice area. There was relative stability at a median follow-up of 3.1 (maximum, 5) years. Moderate/severe transvalvular regurgitation was noted in 89 patients (3.7%) after TAVR and increased over time. Patients with SAVR showed no significant changes. In TAVR, death/reintervention was associated with lower ejection fraction, stroke volume index, and aortic valve mean gradient up to 3 years, with no association with Doppler velocity index or valve area. Reintervention occurred in 20 patients (0.8%) after TAVR and in 1 (0.3%) after SAVR and became less frequent over time. Reintervention was caused by structural deterioration of transcatheter heart valves in only 5 patients. Severely abnormal hemodynamics on echocardiograms were also infrequent and not associated with excess death or reintervention for either TAVR or SAVR. Conclusions and Relevance: This large, core laboratory-based study of transcatheter heart valves revealed excellent durability of the transcatheter heart valves and SAVR. Abnormal findings in individual patients, suggestive of valve thrombosis or structural deterioration, were rare in this protocol-driven database and require further investigation. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00530894.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis is growing rapidly. However, to our knowledge, the durability of these prostheses is incompletely defined. Objective: To determine the midterm hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this study, we analyzed core laboratory-generated data from echocardiograms of all patients enrolled in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 1 Trial with successful TAVR or surgical AVR (SAVR) obtained preimplantation and at 7 days, 1 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postimplantation. Patients from continued access observational studies were included for comparison. Interventions: Successful implantation after randomization to TAVR vs SAVR (PARTNER 1A; TAVR, n = 321; SAVR, n = 313), TAVR vs medical treatment (PARTNER 1B; TAVR, n = 165), and continued access (TAVR, n = 1996). Five-year echocardiogram data were available for 424 patients after TAVR and 49 after SAVR. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death or reintervention for aortic valve structural indications, measured using aortic valve mean gradient, effective orifice area, Doppler velocity index, and evidence of hemodynamic deterioration by reintervention, adverse hemodynamics, or transvalvular regurgitation. Results: Of 2795 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 84.5 (7.1) years, and 1313 (47.0%) were female. Population hemodynamic trends derived from nonlinear mixed-effects models showed small early favorable changes in the first few months post-TAVR, with a decrease of -2.9 mm Hg in aortic valve mean gradient, an increase of 0.028 in Doppler velocity index, and an increase of 0.09 cm2 in effective orifice area. There was relative stability at a median follow-up of 3.1 (maximum, 5) years. Moderate/severe transvalvular regurgitation was noted in 89 patients (3.7%) after TAVR and increased over time. Patients with SAVR showed no significant changes. In TAVR, death/reintervention was associated with lower ejection fraction, stroke volume index, and aortic valve mean gradient up to 3 years, with no association with Doppler velocity index or valve area. Reintervention occurred in 20 patients (0.8%) after TAVR and in 1 (0.3%) after SAVR and became less frequent over time. Reintervention was caused by structural deterioration of transcatheter heart valves in only 5 patients. Severely abnormal hemodynamics on echocardiograms were also infrequent and not associated with excess death or reintervention for either TAVR or SAVR. Conclusions and Relevance: This large, core laboratory-based study of transcatheter heart valves revealed excellent durability of the transcatheter heart valves and SAVR. Abnormal findings in individual patients, suggestive of valve thrombosis or structural deterioration, were rare in this protocol-driven database and require further investigation. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00530894.
Authors: Pamela S Douglas; Jeanne M DeCara; Richard B Devereux; Shelly Duckworth; Julius M Gardin; Wael A Jaber; Annitta J Morehead; Jae K Oh; Michael H Picard; Scott D Solomon; Kevin Wei; Neil J Weissman Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: G Michael Deeb; Michael J Reardon; Stan Chetcuti; Himanshu J Patel; P Michael Grossman; Steven J Yakubov; Neal S Kleiman; Joseph S Coselli; Thomas G Gleason; Joon Sup Lee; James B Hermiller; John Heiser; William Merhi; George L Zorn; Peter Tadros; Newell Robinson; George Petrossian; G Chad Hughes; J Kevin Harrison; Brijeshwar Maini; Mubashir Mumtaz; John Conte; Jon Resar; Vicken Aharonian; Thomas Pfeffer; Jae K Oh; Hongyan Qiao; David H Adams; Jeffrey J Popma Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-04-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samir R Kapadia; Martin B Leon; Raj R Makkar; E Murat Tuzcu; Lars G Svensson; Susheel Kodali; John G Webb; Michael J Mack; Pamela S Douglas; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Howard C Herrmann; Wilson Y Szeto; Augusto D Pichard; Mathew R Williams; Gregory P Fontana; D Craig Miller; William N Anderson; Jodi J Akin; Michael J Davidson; Craig R Smith Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: William F Fearon; Susheel Kodali; Darshan Doshi; Michael P Fischbein; Alan C Yeung; E Murat Tuzcu; Charanjit S Rihal; Vasilis Babaliaros; Alan Zajarias; Howard C Herrmann; David L Brown; Michael Mack; Paul S Teirstein; Brian K Whisenant; Raj Makkar; Samir Kapadia; Martin B Leon Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Alexander C Egbe; Sorin V Pislaru; Patricia A Pellikka; Joseph T Poterucha; Hartzell V Schaff; Joseph J Maleszewski; Heidi M Connolly Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Dong Fang Zhao; Michael Seco; James J Wu; James B Edelman; Michael K Wilson; Michael P Vallely; Michael J Byrom; Paul G Bannon Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Danny Dvir; John G Webb; Sabine Bleiziffer; Miralem Pasic; Ron Waksman; Susheel Kodali; Marco Barbanti; Azeem Latib; Ulrich Schaefer; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Hendrik Treede; Nicolo Piazza; David Hildick-Smith; Dominique Himbert; Thomas Walther; Christian Hengstenberg; Henrik Nissen; Raffi Bekeredjian; Patrizia Presbitero; Enrico Ferrari; Amit Segev; Arend de Weger; Stephan Windecker; Neil E Moat; Massimo Napodano; Manuel Wilbring; Alfredo G Cerillo; Stephen Brecker; Didier Tchetche; Thierry Lefèvre; Federico De Marco; Claudia Fiorina; Anna Sonia Petronio; Rui C Teles; Luca Testa; Jean-Claude Laborde; Martin B Leon; Ran Kornowski Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Oren M Rotman; Brandon Kovarovic; Chander Sadasivan; Luis Gruberg; Baruch B Lieber; Danny Bluestein Journal: Cardiovasc Eng Technol Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 2.495
Authors: Marko P O Virtanen; Markku Eskola; Mikko Savontaus; Tatu Juvonen; Matti Niemelä; Teemu Laakso; Annastiina Husso; Maina P Jalava; Tuomas Tauriainen; Tuomas Ahvenvaara; Pasi Maaranen; Eeva-Maija Kinnunen; Sebastian Dahlbacka; Mika Laine; Timo Mäkikallio; Antti Valtola; Peter Raivio; Stefano Rosato; Paola D'Errigo; Antti Vento; Juhani Airaksinen; Fausto Biancari Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 1.637
Authors: Alexander E Kostyunin; Arseniy E Yuzhalin; Maria A Rezvova; Evgeniy A Ovcharenko; Tatiana V Glushkova; Anton G Kutikhin Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 5.501