Literature DB >> 28973520

Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.

Pamela S Douglas1, Martin B Leon2, Michael J Mack3, Lars G Svensson4, John G Webb5, Rebecca T Hahn2, Philippe Pibarot6, Neil J Weissman7, D Craig Miller8, Samir Kapadia4, Howard C Herrmann9, Susheel K Kodali2, Raj R Makkar10, Vinod H Thourani11, Stamatios Lerakis11, Ashley M Lowry4, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran4, Matthew T Finn2, Maria C Alu2, Craig R Smith2, Eugene H Blackstone4.   

Abstract

Importance: Use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis is growing rapidly. However, to our knowledge, the durability of these prostheses is incompletely defined. Objective: To determine the midterm hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this study, we analyzed core laboratory-generated data from echocardiograms of all patients enrolled in the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) 1 Trial with successful TAVR or surgical AVR (SAVR) obtained preimplantation and at 7 days, 1 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years postimplantation. Patients from continued access observational studies were included for comparison. Interventions: Successful implantation after randomization to TAVR vs SAVR (PARTNER 1A; TAVR, n = 321; SAVR, n = 313), TAVR vs medical treatment (PARTNER 1B; TAVR, n = 165), and continued access (TAVR, n = 1996). Five-year echocardiogram data were available for 424 patients after TAVR and 49 after SAVR. Main Outcomes and Measures: Death or reintervention for aortic valve structural indications, measured using aortic valve mean gradient, effective orifice area, Doppler velocity index, and evidence of hemodynamic deterioration by reintervention, adverse hemodynamics, or transvalvular regurgitation.
Results: Of 2795 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 84.5 (7.1) years, and 1313 (47.0%) were female. Population hemodynamic trends derived from nonlinear mixed-effects models showed small early favorable changes in the first few months post-TAVR, with a decrease of -2.9 mm Hg in aortic valve mean gradient, an increase of 0.028 in Doppler velocity index, and an increase of 0.09 cm2 in effective orifice area. There was relative stability at a median follow-up of 3.1 (maximum, 5) years. Moderate/severe transvalvular regurgitation was noted in 89 patients (3.7%) after TAVR and increased over time. Patients with SAVR showed no significant changes. In TAVR, death/reintervention was associated with lower ejection fraction, stroke volume index, and aortic valve mean gradient up to 3 years, with no association with Doppler velocity index or valve area. Reintervention occurred in 20 patients (0.8%) after TAVR and in 1 (0.3%) after SAVR and became less frequent over time. Reintervention was caused by structural deterioration of transcatheter heart valves in only 5 patients. Severely abnormal hemodynamics on echocardiograms were also infrequent and not associated with excess death or reintervention for either TAVR or SAVR. Conclusions and Relevance: This large, core laboratory-based study of transcatheter heart valves revealed excellent durability of the transcatheter heart valves and SAVR. Abnormal findings in individual patients, suggestive of valve thrombosis or structural deterioration, were rare in this protocol-driven database and require further investigation. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00530894.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28973520      PMCID: PMC5710363          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  25 in total

1.  Echocardiographic imaging in clinical trials: American Society of Echocardiography Standards for echocardiography core laboratories: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Jeanne M DeCara; Richard B Devereux; Shelly Duckworth; Julius M Gardin; Wael A Jaber; Annitta J Morehead; Jae K Oh; Michael H Picard; Scott D Solomon; Kevin Wei; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.251

2.  3-Year Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  G Michael Deeb; Michael J Reardon; Stan Chetcuti; Himanshu J Patel; P Michael Grossman; Steven J Yakubov; Neal S Kleiman; Joseph S Coselli; Thomas G Gleason; Joon Sup Lee; James B Hermiller; John Heiser; William Merhi; George L Zorn; Peter Tadros; Newell Robinson; George Petrossian; G Chad Hughes; J Kevin Harrison; Brijeshwar Maini; Mubashir Mumtaz; John Conte; Jon Resar; Vicken Aharonian; Thomas Pfeffer; Jae K Oh; Hongyan Qiao; David H Adams; Jeffrey J Popma
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-03       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis.

Authors:  George D Dangas; Jeffrey I Weitz; Gennaro Giustino; Raj Makkar; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  5-year outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with standard treatment for patients with inoperable aortic stenosis (PARTNER 1): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Samir R Kapadia; Martin B Leon; Raj R Makkar; E Murat Tuzcu; Lars G Svensson; Susheel Kodali; John G Webb; Michael J Mack; Pamela S Douglas; Vinod H Thourani; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Howard C Herrmann; Wilson Y Szeto; Augusto D Pichard; Mathew R Williams; Gregory P Fontana; D Craig Miller; William N Anderson; Jodi J Akin; Michael J Davidson; Craig R Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comparison of the randomized PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valves) trial with the NRCA (Nonrandomized Continued Access) registry.

Authors:  William F Fearon; Susheel Kodali; Darshan Doshi; Michael P Fischbein; Alan C Yeung; E Murat Tuzcu; Charanjit S Rihal; Vasilis Babaliaros; Alan Zajarias; Howard C Herrmann; David L Brown; Michael Mack; Paul S Teirstein; Brian K Whisenant; Raj Makkar; Samir Kapadia; Martin B Leon
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 11.195

7.  Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis Versus Structural Failure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors.

Authors:  Alexander C Egbe; Sorin V Pislaru; Patricia A Pellikka; Joseph T Poterucha; Hartzell V Schaff; Joseph J Maleszewski; Heidi M Connolly
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Middle-Aged Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dong Fang Zhao; Michael Seco; James J Wu; James B Edelman; Michael K Wilson; Michael P Vallely; Michael J Byrom; Paul G Bannon
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves.

Authors:  Danny Dvir; John G Webb; Sabine Bleiziffer; Miralem Pasic; Ron Waksman; Susheel Kodali; Marco Barbanti; Azeem Latib; Ulrich Schaefer; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Hendrik Treede; Nicolo Piazza; David Hildick-Smith; Dominique Himbert; Thomas Walther; Christian Hengstenberg; Henrik Nissen; Raffi Bekeredjian; Patrizia Presbitero; Enrico Ferrari; Amit Segev; Arend de Weger; Stephan Windecker; Neil E Moat; Massimo Napodano; Manuel Wilbring; Alfredo G Cerillo; Stephen Brecker; Didier Tchetche; Thierry Lefèvre; Federico De Marco; Claudia Fiorina; Anna Sonia Petronio; Rui C Teles; Luca Testa; Jean-Claude Laborde; Martin B Leon; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A multiphase non-linear mixed effects model: An application to spirometry after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.021

View more
  8 in total

1.  Realistic Vascular Replicator for TAVR Procedures.

Authors:  Oren M Rotman; Brandon Kovarovic; Chander Sadasivan; Luis Gruberg; Baruch B Lieber; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.495

Review 2.  The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Mid-term outcomes of Sapien 3 versus Perimount Magna Ease for treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marko P O Virtanen; Markku Eskola; Mikko Savontaus; Tatu Juvonen; Matti Niemelä; Teemu Laakso; Annastiina Husso; Maina P Jalava; Tuomas Tauriainen; Tuomas Ahvenvaara; Pasi Maaranen; Eeva-Maija Kinnunen; Sebastian Dahlbacka; Mika Laine; Timo Mäkikallio; Antti Valtola; Peter Raivio; Stefano Rosato; Paola D'Errigo; Antti Vento; Juhani Airaksinen; Fausto Biancari
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Possible predictive role of electrical risk score on transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in older patients: preliminary data.

Authors:  Gianfranco Piccirillo; Federica Moscucci; Fabiola Mastropietri; Claudia Di Iorio; Marco Valerio Mariani; Marcella Fabietti; Gaetana M Stricchiola; Ilaria Parrotta; Gennaro Sardella; Massimo Mancone; Damiano Magrì
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 5.  Expanding TAVI to Low and Intermediate Risk Patients.

Authors:  Lisa Voigtländer; Moritz Seiffert
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-12

Review 6.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Current Indications and Future Directions.

Authors:  Mirjam Gauri Winkel; Stefan Stortecky; Peter Wenaweser
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-12-18

7.  Impact of leaflet thrombosis on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zixin Tian; Tiejun Li; Shumei Ma
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Degeneration of Bioprosthetic Heart Valves: Update 2020.

Authors:  Alexander E Kostyunin; Arseniy E Yuzhalin; Maria A Rezvova; Evgeniy A Ovcharenko; Tatiana V Glushkova; Anton G Kutikhin
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.501

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.