| Literature DB >> 28972662 |
Marco Schiavon1, Giulio Faggi2, Guido Di Gregorio3, Francesca Calabrese1, Francesca Lunardi1, Giuseppe Marulli1, Paolo Feltracco3, Monica Loy1, Marco Damin1, Emanuele Cozzi4, Dario Gregori5, Fiorella Calabrese1, Federico Rea1.
Abstract
In rapidly deteriorating patients awaiting lung transplantation (LT), supportive strategies are only temporary and urgent lung transplant (ULT) remains the last option. The few publications on this topic report conflicting results. According to the Italian national program, patients on mechanical ventilation and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be included in urgent list. We reviewed our experience from January 2012 to December 2014 with ULT and elective lung transplantation (ELT), focusing on outcomes. In the study period, 16 patients received ULT, while 51 received ELT. Among ULT, 1 patient (5.8%) died in waiting list (WL) while 16 patients underwent LT with a median WL time of 6 days. ELT WL mortality was 13.5%, and median WL time 368 days. In-hospital mortality was lower in ELT group (5.8% vs 37.5%, P < .01), while the other postoperative outcomes were not significantly different. For ULT patients, the highest impact risk factors for in-hospital mortality were pretransplant plasma transfusion, recipient Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization, and high level of reactive C-protein and lactic acid. A ULT program with an accurate recipient selection allows earlier transplantation, reducing WL mortality, with acceptable outcomes, although with a higher in-hospital mortality. Larger studies are needed to validate our results.Entities:
Keywords: blood transfusion; lung transplantation; mortality; urgent recipient
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28972662 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13129
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transplant ISSN: 0902-0063 Impact factor: 2.863