Literature DB >> 28971088

Influence of proximal femur fractures in the autonomy and mortality of elderly patients submitted to osteosynthesis with cephalomedullary nail.

Rodrigo Souto Borges Petros1, Paula Emília Valente Ferreira1, Rafael Souto Borges Petros1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the autonomy and mortality of elderly patients submitted to proximal femoral osteosynthesis with cephalomedullary nail after hip fracture.
METHODS: Retrospective study with 61 patients with proximal femoral fractures submitted to cephalomedullary nail osteosynthesis. The authors analyzed the medical records and collected information from the preoperative period. Patients were questioned regarding pain, postoperative autonomy, and degree of satisfaction. The total number of deaths was verified. The results were then correlated.
RESULTS: The mean age was 84 years, predominantly female (82%). In the postoperative evaluation, 45% of the patients presented worsened levels of autonomy. The majority of patients presented mild pain (61%) on the VAS scale. The mortality rate was 24.6%, and the mean time of preoperative hospitalization was three days. The factors that presented statistical significance regarding postoperative autonomy were the time elapsed from the trauma until the moment of surgery, ASA score, fracture stability, and previous functional status of the patients. The mortality rate was associated with three main factors: advanced age, ASA score, and preoperative hospitalization time.
CONCLUSION: The patient's previous autonomy positively influenced the functional outcome and postoperative recovery. Unstable fractures presented worse results for pain and ambulation in a follow-up of 27 months. Hip fracture is a risk factor associated with mortality and decreased independence in patients over 65 years of age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulation; Elderly; Femoral fractures; Hip fractures; Independent living

Year:  2017        PMID: 28971088      PMCID: PMC5620015          DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop        ISSN: 2255-4971


Introduction

The incidence of proximal femoral fractures has increased significantly in the last decades and is expected to double within the next 25 years, due to increasing life expectancy. Older age and associated comorbidities are responsible for high morbidity and mortality, as well as higher costs of treatment and hospitalization. Among proximal femoral fractures, the transtrochanteric fracture is an important group, since they are common and usually affect debilitated and elderly patients.2, 3 These fractures are defined as those occurring in the area extending from the extracapsular region of the base of the femoral neck to a proximal region along the minor trochanter. This type of fracture is common in the elderly population due to osteoporosis, and is mainly associated with low-energy trauma, such as fall from their own height. It is estimated that nine out of ten trochanteric fractures occur in individuals older than 65 years.5, 6 Hip fracture is a devastating injury in elderly patients, affecting their physical, mental, functional, and social function. It reflects the aging process of the population, and has permanent consequences on patient survival and independence. Surgical stabilization is the option of choice to manage trochanteric fractures, regardless of deviation type or pattern. The goal of surgical treatment is to achieve stable reduction and fixation, allowing early active and passive mobilization. Since elderly individuals are not always able to walk without placing some load on the fractured limb, due to the pre-existing conditions, fracture stabilization must be sufficient to allow a certain load tolerated by the patient. Studies demonstrate that up to 50% of patients with proximal femoral fractures die within the first six months after trauma, and that many patients submitted to surgical treatment do not regain their baseline function and independence. This study aimed to determine the autonomy and mortality of elderly patients who underwent proximal femoral osteosynthesis with cephalomedullary nail after hip fracture.

Methods

A longitudinal, retrospective, and descriptive study was performed with 61 patients with proximal femoral fracture who underwent osteosynthesis with cephalomedullary nail from March 2012 to March 2014, at the Hospital de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Rio de Janeiro, Tijutrauma. Patients’ medical records were analyzed and information from the pre-operative clinical records (clinical evolution and surgical risk) was collected. The following data were collected: age; sex; preoperative time; fracture severity (according to the Tronzo I to V classification); preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score; and pre-trauma autonomy, divided into five walking patterns: (1) Walks outside home community distances without help; (2) Walks outside home community distances with help; (3) Walks household distances without help; (4) Walks household distances with help; (5) Non-ambulatory or wheelchair user. Patients with incomplete medical charts were excluded from the sample. After collection of complete preoperative data, patients were interviewed and underwent clinical evaluation to assess pain through a visual analog scale (VAS), postoperative walking status, and degree of satisfaction. At follow-up, the total number of deaths after surgical treatment was used to determine the mortality rate. Patients who did not attend the interview or who were lost follow-up were excluded. Data collected in the pre- and postoperative periods were then correlated with mortality and with influence on the patients’ autonomy. For statistical analysis of the results, tables with absolute and relative frequency distribution were used. The associations were tested by Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Normality was assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test, and continuous variables were assessed by Student's t-test or ANOVA.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 84 years (±7.2), ranging from 67 to 97. The male group presented a slightly higher mean age than the female group (86 [±8.0] years vs. 83 [±7.0], respectively, without statistical significance [p = 0.260]). Laterality of the affected hip was similar (50.8% and 49.2%, respectively). A significant difference was observed in the prevalence between sex (p < 0.001); as most cases (82.0%) were female, that is, on average, surgical procedures for proximal femoral fracture were performed 4.5 times more often in women than in men (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Frequency by sex of the elderly submitted to surgical treatment with transtrochanteric fracture.

Frequency by sex of the elderly submitted to surgical treatment with transtrochanteric fracture. Regarding fracture classification, 24 patients (39.3%) presented Tronzo type III, while type II was observed in 24.6% (Table 1).
Table 1

Correlation between operated patients and the Tronzo classification.

Tronzon%
I58.2
II1524.6
III2439.3
IV1219.7
V58.2



Total61100
Correlation between operated patients and the Tronzo classification. Mean hospitalization time was 9 days, ranging from 2 to 27. Mean hospitalization time before surgery was 3 days, ranging from 1 to 14. Patients classified as Tronzo type V had the highest mean pre-operative hospitalization: 7 days (p = 0.0047) (Table 2 and Fig. 2).
Table 2

Comparison between the Tronzo classification and mean time of hospital stay.

TronzoMean pre-operative hospitalizationpMean total time of hospital stayp
I1.80.00476.60.0020
II3.610.3
III2.07.0
IV3.39.3
V7.018.0



Total3.19.1
Fig. 2

Comparison between the Tronzo classification and hospitalization time.

Comparison between the Tronzo classification and hospitalization time. Comparison between the Tronzo classification and mean time of hospital stay. In the preoperative assessment, 21 patients were able to walk outside home for community distances without help. After surgery, 15 patients (71.4%) maintained this condition and 33.3% worsened their walking status. Of the patients who were able to walk outside their home for community distances with help, six (50%) maintained their condition and 50% worsened. Of the 10 patients who were able to walk for household distances without help, 44.4% maintained their condition and 55.6% worsened. Of the patients who were able to walk for household distances with help, 60.0% maintained their condition and 40.0% worsened. Therefore, when comparing the pre- and post-operative general ambulation status, 45% of the patients presented a decrease in their level of functional independence (Table 3). The VAS scale was applied after surgery and most patients (60.9%) presented mild pain while 37.0% presented moderate pain. Only one patient (2.2%) reported severe pain. When asked about the degree of satisfaction, 90% of the patients were satisfied with the result of the surgery; the remaining 10% were dissatisfied with not being able to walk or with living in nursing homes, as they did not regain their previous independence.
Table 3

Comparison between pre- and post-operative walking status.

Walking statusEvaluation
Pre-operative
Post-operative
n%n%
Walks outside home for community distances without help2145.71532.6
Walks outside home for community distances with help613817.4
Walks for household distances without help919.636.5
Walks for household distances with help1021.71328.3
Non-ambulatory, wheelchair user00715.2
Total4610046100
Comparison between pre- and post-operative walking status. Patients with a more severe Tronzo score had a higher mean VAS, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.057). Comparing pain (VAS) with preoperative hospitalization time and total hospitalization time, a significant correlation was observed in both situations: longer preoperative hospital stay was associated with greater pain reported on the VAS scale (p = 0.016), as was total hospitalization time (p = 0.026; Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Comparison between level of pain (VAS) and hospitalization time.

Comparison between level of pain (VAS) and hospitalization time. Fifty-eight patients (95.1%) had at least one preoperative comorbidity. Only three patients (4.9%) had no pre-existing disease. The five most common co-morbidities were: SAH (39 patients; 63.9%), dyslipidemia (14 patients, 22.9%), diabetes (10 patients, 16.4%), cardiopathy (seven patients, 11.5%), and hypothyroidism (seven patients, 11.5%). The mortality rate found in the study was 24.6% (15 deaths). Three factors were significantly associated with higher mortality in these patients: advanced age, ASA score, and preoperative hospitalization time (Table 4). Mean age of the patients who died was 87.6 years, versus 82.5 of those patients who were alive (p = 0.016). Patients classified as ASA III or IV presented a higher mortality rate than those classified as ASA I or II: 35.5% versus 13.3%, respectively. Regarding the preoperative hospitalization time, the mortality rate of patients who were operated on within 48 h of the fracture was 14.3%. In patients who were operated on after over 48 h of the fracture, the mortality rate increased to 38.5%.
Table 4

Factors associated with higher mortality rate.

VariableAliven = 46Deathn = 15p
Age–mean (±SD)82.5 (±6.7)87.6 (±7.5)0.16
Gender – n (%)
 Male7 (63.3%)4 (36.4%)0.810
 Female39 (78.0%)11 (22.0%)



Tronzo – n (%)
 Stable16 (80.0%)4 (20.0%)0.561
 Unstable30 (73.2%)11 (26.8%)



ASA – n (%)
 I and II26 (86.7%)4 (13.3%)0.45
 III and IV20 (64.5%)11 (35.5%)



Preoperative hospitalization – n (%)
 Up to 48 h30 (85.7%)5 (14.3%)0.30
 Over 48 h16 (61.5%)10 (38.5%)



Associated lesion, n (%)
 Zero to 335 (81.4%)8 (18.6%)0.093
 Over 3 h11 (61.1%)7 (38.8%)



Total time of hospital stay – n (%)
 Up to 7 days25 (78.1%)7 (21.9%)0.605
 Over 7 days21 (72.4%)8 (27.6%)
Factors associated with higher mortality rate. Factors such as Tronzo classification, gender, number of associated diseases, and total hospitalization time were not associated with mortality.

Discussion

Transtrochanteric femoral fractures are the most frequently operated fracture type, and present the highest postoperative mortality rate; they have become a public healthcare issue, due to the high cost of treatment and the difficulty of recovering postoperative functional independence. The epidemiological profile of the individuals in the present sample was not much different from those observed in Brazilian and international studies. In the present study, a predominance of females was observed, at a 4.5:1 ratio; their mean age was 84 years. Comparing with Brazilian studies, Hungria Neto et al. found a predominance of women in the proportion of 2:1 and a mean age of 78.2 years; Ramalho et al. observed a ratio of 3.3:1 and a mean age of 78.5 years. In the present study, we observed that the degree of autonomy decreased after surgical treatment. Nonetheless, 55% of the patients recovered their functional level. A similar finding was observed by Herrera et al. in their work with 250 patients treated with cephalomedullary nail, in which approximately 50% recovered their previous walking status after one year. Patients’ previous autonomy positively influenced the functional outcome and the postoperative recovery. We observed that 71.4% of patients who were able to walk outside home for community distances without help maintained their level after surgery. This demonstrates that more physically independent patients present better results. Zuckerman et al.11, 12 observed that the group of patients with the best pre-fracture score recovered almost 100% of their functional capacity. Regarding pain intensity after surgical treatment of transtrochanteric fractures, most operated patients (60%) had mild pain; similar data were retrieved in the Brazilian literature. The mortality rate in the present study was 24.6%, at a mean follow-up of 27 months. In a study with 1448 patients, Rosso et al. found a mortality rate of 18.8% in one year of follow-up, while Dousa et al., in a study with 4280 patients, observed a 30% death rate. Cooper et al. stated that the consequences of a hip fracture include premature death (around 20% in one year), loss of function (in 30%), inability to walk independently (40%), and loss of at least one independent daily activity (in 80% of the patients treated). Some factors were statistically significant for mortality, such as time elapsed from trauma to surgery, ASA score, fracture stability, and age at the time of trauma. In the present study, patients with preoperative hospitalization time greater than 48 h had a 38.5% mortality rate, while patients who underwent surgical treatment in up to 48 h had a lower rate, 14.3%. Regarding the time of surgical delay, Hamlet et al. demonstrated that patients operated within the first 24 h of admission had lower mortality than those operated after 24 h, regardless of the preoperative ASA score. The higher mortality rate associated with surgical delay demonstrates the importance of the early treatment of these fractures, which are now treated as orthopedic emergencies. Some factors undermine the improvement of this treatment, such as overcrowding of public hospitals, bureaucracy for surgical authorization, availability of the necessary materials, and availability of medical staff. Another factor that was statistically significant for mortality was the ASA score. Only four deaths (6.5%) were observed in patients classified as ASA I and II, versus 11 (18%) in patients classified as ASA III and IV. Michel et al. demonstrated that patients classified as ASA III or IV had a nearly nine-fold greater risk of death in the first postoperative year than those classified as ASA I or II (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Patient's previous autonomy positively influenced functional outcome and postoperative recovery. In a follow-up of 27 months, unstable fractures presented worse results for pain and walking status. Hip fracture is a risk factor associated with mortality and decreased autonomy in patients aged over 65 years. These fractures are devastating injuries that should be treated as orthopedic emergencies.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
  14 in total

1.  A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: II. Validity and reliability.

Authors:  J D Zuckerman; K J Koval; G B Aharonoff; M L Skovron
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: I. Development.

Authors:  J D Zuckerman; K J Koval; G B Aharonoff; R Hiebert; M L Skovron
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Osteoporotic fractures of proximal femur: clinical and epidemiological features in a population of the city of São Paulo.

Authors:  A C Ramalho; M Lazaretti-Castro; O Hauache; J G Vieira; E Takata; F Cafalli; F Tavares
Journal:  Sao Paulo Med J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.044

4.  A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  A Herrera; L J Domingo; A Calvo; A Martínez; J Cuenca
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-07-31       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Influence of health status and the timing of surgery on mortality in hip fracture patients.

Authors:  W P Hamlet; J R Lieberman; E L Freedman; F J Dorey; A Fletcher; E E Johnson
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1997-09

6.  Hip fracture surgery: is the pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score a predictor of functional outcome?

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Michel; Claude Klopfenstein; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Richard Stern; Bernard Grab
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  [Trochanteric femoral fractures].

Authors:  P Douša; O Čech; M Weissinger; V Džupa
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.531

Review 8.  Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Kevin Kaplan; Ryan Miyamoto; Brett R Levine; Kenneth A Egol; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CAUSES OF PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES AMONG THE ELDERLY.

Authors:  José Soares Hungria Neto; Caio Roncon Dias; José Daniel Bula de Almeida
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16

10.  PROSPECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE CLINICAL, RADIOGRAPHIC AND FUNCTIONAL EVOLUTION OF TREATMENT FOR UNSTABLE TROCHANTERIC FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR USING A CEPHALOMEDULLARY NAIL.

Authors:  Richard Armelin Borger; Frederico Araújo Borger; Rodrigo Pires de Araújo; Thiago Ferreira Nunes Pereira; Roberto Dantas Queiroz
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-17
View more
  4 in total

1.  Long-term functional outcome after a low-energy hip fracture in elderly patients.

Authors:  Stijn G C J de Joode; Pishtiwan H S Kalmet; Audrey A A Fiddelers; Martijn Poeze; Taco J Blokhuis
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-04-11

2.  Long-term Patient-reported Quality of Life and Pain After a Multidisciplinary Clinical Pathway for Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Authors:  Pishtiwan H S Kalmet; Stijn G C J de Joode; Audrey A A Fiddelers; Rene H M Ten Broeke; Martijn Poeze; Taco Blokhuis
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-06-06

3.  Cost Determinants of Continuum-Care Episodes for Hip Fracture.

Authors:  Davide Golinelli; Erik Boetto; Antonio Mazzotti; Simona Rosa; Paola Rucci; Elena Berti; Cristina Ugolini; Maria Pia Fantini
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2021-02-16

4.  DOES PERICAPSULAR ANESTHETIC BLOCK IMPROVE THE POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD IN TRANSTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES?

Authors:  Bruno Silva Tavares; Rafael DE Almeida Machado; Ulisses Tavares DE Arruda; Leandro Alves DE Oliveira
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 0.683

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.