| Literature DB >> 28970772 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several factors, such as cost, branding, packaging and family influence, had been implicated as influencing the choice of toothpastes and toothbrushes by individuals. Media advertisement is also considered a very strong factor influencing consumer's choice. AIM: To assess the extent to which some factors influenced the choice of toothpastes and toothbrushes among dental patients in a Nigerian teaching hospital.Entities:
Keywords: Choice; Dental; Out-patients; Toothbrush; Toothpaste
Year: 2017 PMID: 28970772 PMCID: PMC5598444
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Ib Postgrad Med
Distribution of respondents according to their age groups and academic status
| Frequency (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| < 21 | 24 (11.9) |
| 21 - 30 | 66 (32.7) | |
| 31 - 40 | 33 (16.3) | |
| 41 - 50 | 25 (12.4) | |
| > 50 | 54 (26.7) | |
| 202 (100) | ||
| = Secondary school | 48 (23.7) | |
| Post-secondary school diploma | 26 (12.9) | |
| University degree | 128 (63.4) | |
| 202 (100) | ||
Figure 1:Distribution of Respondents according to their concern for specific brands in their choice of toothpaste and toothbrush
Factors that influence the choice of toothpaste by respondents
| Factors that affect choice of toothpaste | Rate at which factors influenced respondents' choice (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Influenced | Indifferent | No influence | |
| Colour of toothpaste | 71 (35.1) | 46 (22.8) | 85 (42.1) |
| Cost of toothpaste | 77 (38.1) | 35 (17.3) | 90 (44.6) |
| Flavour/taste of toothpaste | 102 (50.5) | 35 (17.3) | 65 (32.2) |
| Packaging (beauty of pack) | 70 (34.7) | 51 (25.2) | 81 (40.1) |
| Media advertisement (T.V/Radio) | 59 (29.2) | 56 (27.7) | 87 (43.1) |
| Family influence (parents/children) | 82 (40.6) | 37 (18.3) | 83 (41.1) |
| Herbal content | 86 (42.6) | 33 (16.3) | 83 (41.1) |
| Fluoride content | 126 (62.4) | 30 (14.8) | 46 (22.8) |
| Previous experience | 140 (69.3) | 24 (11.9) | 38 (18.8) |
| Advice by a dentist | 111 (55.0) | 21 (10.4) | 70 (34.6) |
Factors that influence choice of toothbrush by respondents
| Factors that affect choice of toothbrush | Rate at which factors influenced respondents' choice (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Influenced | Indifferent | No influence | |
| Texture of bristle | 181 (89.6) | 7 (3.5) | 14(6.9) |
| Cost of toothbrush | 85 (42.1) | 41(20.3) | 76(37.6) |
| Brand (maker) | 127 (62.9) | 34(16.8) | 41(20.3) |
| Packaging (beauty of brush) | 89 (44.1) | 49(24.2) | 64(31.7) |
| Media advertisement (T.V/Radio) | 49 (24.2) | 47(23.3) | 106 (52.5) |
| Family influence (Parents/children) | 61 (30.2) | 49(24.3) | 92(45.5) |
| Previous experience | 130 (64.4) | 33(16.3) | 39(19.3) |
| Size of head of toothbrush | 105 (52.0) | 44(21.8) | 53(26.2) |
| Advice by a dentist | 102 (50.5) | 20(9.9) | 80(39.6) |
Comparison of the highest academic qualification of respondents with some factors that influenced their choice of toothbrush and toothpaste
| Influencing factors | Highest academic achievement (%) | Total (%) | P – value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary school | Diploma | University degree | ||||
| Influence | 29(14.4) | 10 (5.0) | 91(45.0) | 130 (64.4) | ||
| Indifferent | 11 (5.4) | 1(0.5) | 21(10.4) | 33(16.3) | <0.001 | |
| No Influence | 8(4.0) | 15 (7.4) | 16(7.9) | 39(19.3) | ||
| Influence | 29(14.4) | 17 (8.4) | 94(46.5) | 140 (69.3) | ||
| Indifferent | 7(3.5) | 2(1.0) | 15(7.4) | 24 (11.9) | 0.34 | |
| No Influence | 12 (5.9) | 7(3.5) | 19(9.4) | 38 (18.8) | ||
| 48(23.8) | 26(12.9) | 128(63.3) | 202(100) | |||
Comparison of the respondents’ preference for either the fluoride or herbal contents in their choice of toothpaste
| Fluoride content (%) | Total (%) | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | ||||
| Herbal | Yes | 67 (33.2) | 19 (9.4) | 86 (42.6) | <0.001 |
| content | No | 60 (29.7) | 56 (27.7) | 116 (57.4) | |
| Total | 127 (62.9) | 75 (37.1) | 202 (100) | ||